Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MLGO
MicroAlgo Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-65.0%
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$485M
5Y Perf.-80.1%
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$483M
5Y Perf.-39.7%
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.18B
5Y Perf.-67.8%

MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MLGO logoMLGO
MGNI logoMGNI
PUBM logoPUBM
PERI logoPERI
TTD logoTTD
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureAdvertising AgenciesSoftware - ApplicationInternet Content & InformationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$45M$2.01B$485M$483M$11.18B
Revenue (TTM)$61M$723M$282M$440M$2.97B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$159M$-17M$-8M$433M
Gross Margin26.8%63.4%63.2%33.3%77.8%
Operating Margin5.8%14.8%-7.3%-3.4%20.3%
Forward P/E1.9x13.4x8.9x21.2x
Total Debt$4M$279M$44M$42M$436M
Cash & Equiv.$175M$553M$146M$91M$658M

MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MLGO
MGNI
PUBM
PERI
TTD
StockApr 21May 26Return
MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO)1000.0-100.0%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10035.0-65.0%
PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM)10019.9-80.1%
Perion Network Ltd. (PERI)10060.3-39.7%
The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD)10032.2-67.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PERI and TTD are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Trade Desk, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MLGO and MGNI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MLGO
MicroAlgo Inc.
The Value Play

MLGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (1.9x vs 21.2x)
Best for: value
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
Best for: quality
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PUBM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.
The Income Pick

PERI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
  • 139.6% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
  • Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
The Growth Play

TTD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
  • 18.5% revenue growth vs MLGO's -19.1%
  • 7.3% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 21.3% vs -6.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTTD logoTTD18.5% revenue growth vs MLGO's -19.1%
ValueMLGO logoMLGOLower P/E (1.9x vs 21.2x)
Quality / MarginsMGNI logoMGNI22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
Stability / SafetyPERI logoPERIBeta 0.94 vs MLGO's 2.29
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PERI logoPERI+16.9% vs MLGO's -94.4%
Efficiency (ROA)TTD logoTTD7.3% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 21.3% vs -6.8%

MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MLGOMicroAlgo Inc.
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$422M
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PUBMPubMatic, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$283M
PERIPerion Network Ltd.
FY 2024
Display and Social Advertising
67.3%$336M
Search Advertising and other
32.7%$163M
TTDThe Trade Desk, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTTDLAGGINGPUBM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TTD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 48.5x MLGO's $61M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%. On growth, TTD holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMLGO logoMLGOMicroAlgo Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…TTD logoTTDThe Trade Desk, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$61M$723M$282M$440M$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$145M$11M$3M$693M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$159M-$17M-$8M$433M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$44M$43M$39M$837M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.8%+63.4%+63.2%+33.3%+77.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.8%+14.8%-7.3%-3.4%+20.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.1%+22.0%-6.2%-1.8%+14.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.9%+6.1%+15.1%+8.9%+28.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-34.3%+5.5%-2.0%+5.8%+11.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.2%+142.9%-35.0%+72.7%-20.0%
TTD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MLGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.9x trailing earnings, MLGO trades at a 92% valuation discount to TTD's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.

MetricMLGO logoMLGOMicroAlgo Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…TTD logoTTDThe Trade Desk, I…
Market CapShares × price$45M$2.0B$485M$483M$11.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$126M$1.7B$384M$434M$11.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.94x14.74x-33.03x-56.74x25.81x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.45x8.89x21.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.96x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-133.59x11.43x14.47x106.04x15.54x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.75x2.81x1.72x1.10x3.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.09x2.33x1.83x0.67x4.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.13x12.11x7.28x12.66x14.05x
MLGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TTD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. MLGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLGO scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMLGO logoMLGOMicroAlgo Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…TTD logoTTDThe Trade Desk, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.9%+18.6%-7.0%-1.2%+16.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.7%+5.3%-2.6%-0.9%+7.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%+9.5%-6.8%-1.7%+21.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.3%+7.3%-5.5%-1.8%+19.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966536
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.30x0.17x0.06x0.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$170M-$275M-$102M-$49M-$222M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$175M$553M$146M$91M$658M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$279M$44M$42M$436M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.39x4.03x1591.47x
TTD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — MGNI and PERI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PERI five years ago would be worth $6,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for MLGO. Over the past 12 months, PERI leads with a +16.9% total return vs MLGO's -94.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs MLGO's -92.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMLGO logoMLGOMicroAlgo Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…TTD logoTTDThe Trade Desk, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.7%-12.8%+19.2%+15.3%-37.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-94.4%+12.6%+2.0%+16.9%-58.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+58.7%-18.5%-68.0%-63.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-60.9%-77.1%-37.2%-64.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-4.7%-65.2%+139.6%+680.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-92.8%+16.7%-6.6%-31.6%-28.7%
Evenly matched — MGNI and PERI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PERI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLGO's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs MLGO's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMLGO logoMLGOMicroAlgo Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…TTD logoTTDThe Trade Desk, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.29x1.63x1.51x0.94x1.06x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$117.00$26.65$13.88$11.79$91.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.02$10.82$6.21$8.07$19.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.5%+52.5%+73.8%+91.4%+25.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.155.466.559.152.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded137K2.1M746K321K20.4M
PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy", PERI as "Buy", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).

MetricMLGO logoMLGOMicroAlgo Inc.MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.PUBM logoPUBMPubMatic, Inc.PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…TTD logoTTDThe Trade Desk, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$14.00$14.00$37.12
# AnalystsCovering analysts31161346
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.3%+9.6%+14.7%+12.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MLGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI vs TTD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.

(TTD) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) offers the better valuation at 1. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD?

On trailing P/E, MicroAlgo Inc.

(MLGO) is the cheapest at 1. 9x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD?

Over the past 5 years, Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) delivered a total return of -37. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus MLGO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus MicroAlgo Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning MLGO is approximately 143% more volatile than PERI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Trade Desk, Inc.

(TTD) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus -19. 1% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTD leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD?

MicroAlgo Inc.

(MLGO) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.

(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for The Trade Desk, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.

(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, MLGO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MLGO and MGNI and PUBM and PERI and TTD?

These companies operate in different sectors (MLGO (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MLGO is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MLGO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUBM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PERI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTD

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MLGO and MGNI and PUBM and PERI and TTD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MLGO: -34.3% · MGNI: 5.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(MLGO: 11.1% · MGNI: 22.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MLGO: 1.9x · MGNI: 14.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.