Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MLM vs MDU

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$37.12B
5Y Perf.+220.4%
MDU
MDU Resources Group, Inc.

Conglomerates

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.82B
5Y Perf.+169.8%

MLM vs MDU — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MLM logoMLM
MDU logoMDU
IndustryConstruction MaterialsConglomerates
Market Cap$37.12B$4.82B
Revenue (TTM)$6.55B$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$2.53B$169M
Gross Margin29.6%31.8%
Operating Margin22.7%14.8%
Forward P/E31.5x22.8x
Total Debt$5.32B$2.29B
Cash & Equiv.$67M$50M

MLM vs MDULong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MLM
MDU
StockMay 20May 26Return
Martin Marietta Mat… (MLM)100320.4+220.4%
MDU Resources Group… (MDU)100269.8+169.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MLM vs MDU

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MLM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MDU Resources Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
The Growth Play

MLM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 0.1%, EPS growth -42.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.0%
  • 259.4% 10Y total return vs MDU's 224.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 3.57x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MDU
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

MDU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.3%
  • Beta 0.38, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Lower P/E (22.8x vs 31.5x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMLM logoMLM0.1% revenue growth vs MDU's -2.5%
ValueMDU logoMDULower P/E (22.8x vs 31.5x)
Quality / MarginsMLM logoMLM38.7% margin vs MDU's 9.0%
Stability / SafetyMDU logoMDUBeta 0.38 vs MLM's 0.87
DividendsMLM logoMLM0.5% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs MDU's 2.3%
Momentum (1Y)MDU logoMDU+30.3% vs MLM's +15.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MLM logoMLM13.3% ROA vs MDU's 2.4%, ROIC 7.6% vs 3.9%

MLM vs MDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MLMMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
FY 2025
Building Materials Business
100.0%$5.7B
MDUMDU Resources Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Natural Gas Transportation
63.2%$235M
Other Revenues
30.4%$113M
Natural Gas, Storage
6.4%$24M

MLM vs MDU — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMDULAGGINGMLM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MLM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 3.5x MDU's $1.9B. MLM is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDU's 9.0%. On growth, MDU holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMLM logoMLMMartin Marietta M…MDU logoMDUMDU Resources Gro…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.6B$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.1B$484M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.5B$169M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.0B-$22M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.6%+31.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.7%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+38.7%+9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.8%-1.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.7%+8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.2%-71.9%
MLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MDU leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 16.3x trailing earnings, MDU trades at a 50% valuation discount to MLM's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDU's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLM's 19.6x.

MetricMLM logoMLMMartin Marietta M…MDU logoMDUMDU Resources Gro…
Market CapShares × price$37.1B$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$42.4B$7.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS32.74x16.28x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.51x22.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.63x15.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.67x2.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.71x1.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.96x
MDU leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MLM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MLM delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $6 for MDU. MLM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDU's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLM scores 7/9 vs MDU's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMLM logoMLMMartin Marietta M…MDU logoMDUMDU Resources Gro…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+25.1%+6.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.3%+2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.6%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.7%+4.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x0.85x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.3B$2.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$67M$50M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.3B$2.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.44x3.03x
MLM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MDU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MDU five years ago would be worth $18,772 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,903 for MLM. Over the past 12 months, MDU leads with a +30.3% total return vs MLM's +15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDU at 29.0% vs MLM's 16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMLM logoMLMMartin Marietta M…MDU logoMDUMDU Resources Gro…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.9%+13.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.7%+30.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+57.6%+114.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.0%+87.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+259.4%+224.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.4%+29.0%
MDU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDU currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs MLM's 86.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMLM logoMLMMartin Marietta M…MDU logoMDUMDU Resources Gro…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$710.97$22.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$530.86$15.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.6%+97.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.562.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded492K1.5M
MDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MLM and MDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates MLM as "Buy" and MDU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.0% upside for MLM (target: $695) vs -5.9% for MDU (target: $21). For income investors, MDU offers the higher dividend yield at 2.25% vs MLM's 0.53%.

MetricMLM logoMLMMartin Marietta M…MDU logoMDUMDU Resources Gro…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$695.30$21.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts4017
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.26$0.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — MLM and MDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MDU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MLM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallMDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MLM vs MDU: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MLM or MDU a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

(MLM) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MLM or MDU?

On trailing P/E, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

(MDU) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, MDU Resources Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MLM or MDU?

Over the past 5 years, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

(MDU) delivered a total return of +87. 7%, compared to +69. 0% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLM returned +259. 4% versus MDU's +224. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MLM or MDU?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MDU Resources Group, Inc.

(MDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning MLM is approximately 128% more volatile than MDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 85% for MDU Resources Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MLM or MDU?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

(MLM) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -2. 5% for MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MDU Resources Group, Inc. grew EPS -32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -42. 0% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MLM leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MLM or MDU?

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

(MLM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 16. 0% for MDU Resources Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLM leads at 23. 3% versus 15. 1% for MDU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDU leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MLM or MDU more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

(MDU) trades at 22. 8x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MLM: 13. 0% to $695. 30.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MLM or MDU?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 0. 5% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM).

09

Is MLM or MDU better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

(MDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 2. 3% yield, +224. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDU: +224. 6%, MLM: +259. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MLM and MDU?

These companies operate in different sectors (MLM (Basic Materials) and MDU (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MLM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MDU is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MLM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDU

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MLM and MDU on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MLM: 0.7% · MDU: 8.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(MLM: 38.7% · MDU: 9.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MLM: 32.7x · MDU: 16.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.