Travel Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $4.52B | $132.72B | $29.58B | $84.21B | $34.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $27.69B | $15.17B | $12.65B | $59.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $6.15B | $1.56B | $2.52B | $31.17B |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 100.0% | 88.8% | 82.9% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 34.3% | 14.7% | 20.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 73.2x | 16.3x | 13.0x | 28.3x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $237M | $19.29B | $6.67B | $2.07B | $40.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $509M | $17.20B | $6.98B | $6.56B | $48.44B |
MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 171.0 | +71.0% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
| Trip.com Group Limi… (TCOM) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MMYT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- 25.0% revenue growth vs EXPE's 7.6%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs MMYT's 190.1%
- PEG 0.10 vs TCOM's 0.11
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
EXPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +52.8% vs MMYT's -54.9%
Among these 5 stocks, ABNB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.6%
- 52.2% margin vs MMYT's 5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs EXPE's 7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 28.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs MMYT's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs EXPE's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs EXPE's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs MMYT's 3.1% |
MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 1 of 6 categories
TCOM leads 1 • EXPE leads 1 • MMYT leads 0 • ABNB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 57.5x MMYT's $1.0B. TCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMYT's 5.5%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $27.7B | $15.2B | $12.6B | $59.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $175M | $10.2B | $3.1B | $2.6B | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $6.2B | $1.6B | $2.5B | $31.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | $9.0B | $4.9B | $4.5B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +100.0% | +88.8% | +82.9% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +34.3% | +14.7% | +20.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +22.2% | +10.3% | +19.9% | +52.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +32.6% | +32.1% | +36.0% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +16.2% | +14.7% | +17.9% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -68.3% | +2.4% | +96.8% | +4.0% | +188.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EXPE and TCOM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, TCOM trades at a 76% valuation discount to MMYT's 60.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BKNG offers better value at 0.16x vs TCOM's 0.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $132.7B | $29.6B | $84.2B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $134.8B | $29.3B | $79.7B | $33.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 60.86x | 25.87x | 25.77x | 34.85x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 73.17x | 16.32x | 13.02x | 28.35x | 1.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | — | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.92x | 13.41x | 10.22x | 31.33x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.62x | 4.93x | 2.01x | 6.88x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.79x | — | 13.10x | 10.67x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.07x | 14.61x | 9.51x | 18.12x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $8 for MMYT. MMYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCOM scores 7/9 vs ABNB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | — | +68.7% | +31.2% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +21.1% | +6.0% | +10.2% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | — | +40.2% | +50.6% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +75.4% | +23.9% | +26.3% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | — | 2.62x | 0.25x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$272M | $2.1B | -$307M | -$4.5B | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $509M | $17.2B | $7.0B | $6.6B | $48.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237M | $19.3B | $6.7B | $2.1B | $40.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.67x | 7.21x | 16.35x | — | 31.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,289 for ABNB. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs ABNB's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.3% | -19.4% | -10.5% | +5.6% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.9% | -16.8% | +52.8% | +14.1% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.5% | +65.4% | +175.6% | +11.8% | +61.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.0% | +87.6% | +46.9% | -7.1% | +36.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.1% | +250.7% | +130.6% | -2.9% | +24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +18.3% | +40.2% | +3.8% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKNG and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXPE's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 1.33x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $113.85 | $5129.83 | $303.80 | $147.25 | $78.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.84 | $150.62 | $148.55 | $110.81 | $48.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.4% | +3.3% | +83.2% | +95.4% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 42.4 | 50.2 | 56.2 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 8.7M | 1.9M | 3.5M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BKNG and TCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MMYT as "Buy", BKNG as "Buy", EXPE as "Hold", ABNB as "Hold", TCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). For income investors, BKNG offers the higher dividend yield at 0.89% vs EXPE's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $91.00 | $231.72 | $272.35 | $145.44 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 71 | 75 | 44 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +0.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.53 | $1.52 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +4.9% | +6.5% | +4.5% | +0.9% |
BKNG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TCOM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MMYT vs BKNG vs EXPE vs ABNB vs TCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM?
On trailing P/E, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Trip. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Booking Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 10x versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -7. 1% for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus ABNB's -2. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Expedia Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning EXPE is approximately 98% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trip. com Group Limited grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM?
Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 0% net margin versus 8. 8% for Expedia Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 12. 3% for MMYT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus Trip. com Group Limited's 0. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 71. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield), EXPE (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. MMYT, ABNB, TCOM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MMYT or BKNG or EXPE or ABNB or TCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, ABNB: -2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MMYT and BKNG and EXPE and ABNB and TCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TCOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BKNG, EXPE pay a dividend while MMYT, ABNB, TCOM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.