Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-46.3%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$364.95B
5Y Perf.+92.7%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$178.49B
5Y Perf.+871.6%
TTEC
TTEC Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$149M
5Y Perf.-92.8%
HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.47B
5Y Perf.+205.9%

MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MNDO logoMNDO
CSCO logoCSCO
ANET logoANET
TTEC logoTTEC
HPE logoHPE
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationCommunication EquipmentComputer HardwareInformation Technology ServicesCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$21M$364.95B$178.49B$149M$39.47B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$59.05B$9.71B$2.10B$35.79B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$11.08B$3.72B$-201M$-156M
Gross Margin51.0%64.4%63.5%15.5%30.7%
Operating Margin10.7%23.0%42.8%4.3%5.8%
Forward P/E7.8x22.2x40.0x2.5x12.3x
Total Debt$929K$29.64B$0.00$1.00B$22.36B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$9.47B$1.96B$83M$5.77B

MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MNDO
CSCO
ANET
TTEC
HPE
StockMay 20May 26Return
MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO)10053.7-46.3%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100192.7+92.7%
Arista Networks, In… (ANET)100971.6+871.6%
TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC)1007.2-92.8%
Hewlett Packard Ent… (HPE)100305.9+205.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ANET leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MIND C.T.I. Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. TTEC and HPE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Income Pick

MNDO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
  • Beta 0.07 vs ANET's 2.15
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, CSCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
The Growth Play

ANET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
  • 33.7% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 301.7%
  • 28.6% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
  • 38.3% margin vs TTEC's -9.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TTEC
TTEC Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

TTEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (2.5x vs 12.3x)
Best for: value
HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
The Momentum Pick

HPE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +82.6% vs MNDO's -34.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthANET logoANET28.6% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
ValueTTEC logoTTECLower P/E (2.5x vs 12.3x)
Quality / MarginsANET logoANET38.3% margin vs TTEC's -9.6%
Stability / SafetyMNDO logoMNDOBeta 0.07 vs ANET's 2.15
DividendsMNDO logoMNDO21.6% yield, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HPE logoHPE+82.6% vs MNDO's -34.8%
Efficiency (ROA)ANET logoANET19.7% ROA vs TTEC's -14.2%, ROIC 32.8% vs 6.2%

MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
FY 2025
Service
96.2%$19M
License
3.8%$733,000
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
44.5%$28.3B
Service
34.5%$22.0B
Security
12.7%$8.1B
Collaboration
6.5%$4.2B
Observability
1.7%$1.1B
ANETArista Networks, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
84.1%$7.6B
Service
15.9%$1.4B
TTECTTEC Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
TTEC Engage
78.0%$1.7B
TTEC Digital
22.0%$469M
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Company
FY 2025
Server Segment
51.4%$17.6B
Networking
19.9%$6.8B
Hybrid Cloud
16.2%$5.5B
Financial Services
10.2%$3.5B
Corporate Investments
2.2%$769M

MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLANETLAGGINGHPE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 3035.1x MNDO's $19M. ANET is the more profitable business, keeping 38.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTEC's -9.6%. On growth, ANET holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdCSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …TTEC logoTTECTTEC Holdings, In…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$59.1B$9.7B$2.1B$35.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M$16.1B$4.2B$178M$4.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M$11.1B$3.7B-$201M-$156M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4M$12.8B$5.3B$34M$4.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.0%+64.4%+63.5%+15.5%+30.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.7%+23.0%+42.8%+4.3%+5.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.4%+18.8%+38.3%-9.6%-0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.9%+21.8%+54.4%+1.6%+12.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.0%+9.7%+35.1%-7.1%+19.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-23.4%+29.5%+25.0%-6.6%-26.2%
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TTEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 85% valuation discount to ANET's 51.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ANET's 44.9x.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdCSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …TTEC logoTTECTTEC Holdings, In…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
Market CapShares × price$21M$365.0B$178.5B$149M$39.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13M$385.1B$176.5B$1.1B$56.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.77x36.14x51.55x-0.77x-665.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.18x40.02x2.52x12.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.68x26.34x44.93x5.76x12.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.06x6.44x19.82x0.07x1.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x7.87x14.62x1.31x1.59x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.20x27.46x41.97x1.82x62.95x
TTEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ANET delivers a 30.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-100 for TTEC. MNDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEC's 8.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs ANET's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdCSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …TTEC logoTTECTTEC Holdings, In…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.9%+23.2%+30.6%-99.6%-0.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.6%+9.0%+19.7%-14.2%-0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.6%+13.0%+32.8%+6.2%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.8%+13.7%+30.4%+7.5%+3.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948455
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.63x8.86x0.90x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M$20.2B-$2.0B$917M$16.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$9.5B$2.0B$83M$5.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$929,000$29.6B$0$1.0B$22.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.64x-4.22x-11.81x
ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ANET five years ago would be worth $69,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $556 for TTEC. Over the past 12 months, HPE leads with a +82.6% total return vs MNDO's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANET at 60.1% vs TTEC's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdCSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …TTEC logoTTECTTEC Holdings, In…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.7%+22.3%+6.1%-14.3%+23.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-34.8%+57.5%+64.0%-21.9%+82.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.2%+109.3%+310.6%-88.9%+120.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.0%+87.2%+590.5%-94.4%+95.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+66.7%+301.7%+3374.3%-61.8%+269.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.8%+27.9%+60.1%-51.9%+30.1%
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MNDO and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANET's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HPE currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs TTEC's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdCSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …TTEC logoTTECTTEC Holdings, In…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.07x0.92x2.15x1.84x1.62x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.64$94.72$179.80$5.60$30.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.98$59.07$82.80$1.98$16.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.6%+97.3%+78.8%+54.6%+97.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10027.463.941.452.974.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded37K18.9M7.3M662K15.0M
Evenly matched — MNDO and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MNDO and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CSCO as "Buy", ANET as "Buy", TTEC as "Hold", HPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1016.7% upside for TTEC (target: $34) vs -3.3% for HPE (target: $29). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs CSCO's 1.75%.

MetricMNDO logoMNDOMIND C.T.I. LtdCSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …TTEC logoTTECTTEC Holdings, In…HPE logoHPEHewlett Packard E…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$96.50$186.25$34.17$28.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts73511437
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+21.6%+1.7%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01503
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.22$1.61$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+2.0%+0.9%0.0%+0.5%
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTEC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallArista Networks, Inc. (ANET)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MNDO vs CSCO vs ANET vs TTEC vs HPE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE?

On trailing P/E, MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Arista Networks, Inc. at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, TTEC Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE?

Over the past 5 years, Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) delivered a total return of +590. 5%, compared to -94. 4% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANET returned +33. 7% versus TTEC's -61. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Arista Networks, Inc. 's 2. 15β — meaning ANET is approximately 3018% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 9% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TTEC Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 8% year-over-year, compared to -102. 3% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANET leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE?

Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus -9. 0% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANET leads at 42. 8% versus 4. 5% for TTEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TTEC Holdings, Inc.

(TTEC) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Arista Networks, Inc. — 37. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEC: 1016. 7% to $34. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE?

In this comparison, MNDO (21.

6% yield), HPE (2. 0% yield), CSCO (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ANET, TTEC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MNDO or CSCO or ANET or TTEC or HPE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.

T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, ANET: +33. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MNDO and CSCO and ANET and TTEC and HPE?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ANET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TTEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO, CSCO, HPE pay a dividend while ANET, TTEC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MNDO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 8.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANET

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTEC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HPE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MNDO and CSCO and ANET and TTEC and HPE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MNDO: -6.0% · CSCO: 9.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(MNDO: 13.4% · CSCO: 18.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MNDO: 7.8x · CSCO: 36.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.