Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $21M | $2.29B | $1.44B | $10.57B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1.24B | $951M | $2.52B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $64M | $133M | $519M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 48.3% | 46.4% | 44.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 13.9% | 19.1% | 26.0% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 15.9x | 6.0x | 21.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $929K | $587M | $1.13B | $0.00 | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $180M | $306M | $102M | $599M |
MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| CSG Systems Interna… (CSGS) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNDO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07 vs EVTC's 0.76, lower leverage
CSGS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 114.6% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
- +33.5% vs FIS's -35.3%
EVTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 10.2% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.16
JKHY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 17.0% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs CSGS's 9.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs EVTC's 0.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0% |
MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
MNDO leads 1 • CSGS leads 1 • EVTC leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 560.0x MNDO's $19M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1.2B | $951M | $2.5B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $225M | $316M | $810M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $64M | $133M | $519M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $131M | $145M | $728M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +48.3% | +46.4% | +44.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +13.9% | +19.1% | +26.0% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +5.1% | +13.9% | +20.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +10.6% | +15.2% | +28.9% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +4.8% | +8.4% | +8.7% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.4% | +45.6% | -24.0% | +12.5% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 88% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EVTC offers better value at 1.18x vs CSGS's 23.89x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $2.3B | $1.4B | $10.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $2.7B | $2.3B | $10.5B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.77x | 40.60x | 10.62x | 23.40x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.86x | 5.97x | 21.79x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 23.89x | 1.18x | 2.32x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.68x | 7.26x | 7.34x | 13.53x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 1.87x | 1.54x | 4.45x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 8.00x | 2.11x | 5.01x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.20x | 16.21x | 10.62x | 17.97x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. MNDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSGS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs MNDO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +22.0% | +18.7% | +24.0% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | +4.3% | +6.1% | +17.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +32.5% | +10.2% | +21.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +33.7% | +10.5% | +22.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 2.07x | 1.58x | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $407M | $824M | -$102M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $180M | $306M | $102M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $929,000 | $587M | $1.1B | $0 | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.10x | 3.10x | 122.37x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSGS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSGS five years ago would be worth $18,936 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CSGS leads with a +33.5% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSGS at 19.9% vs EVTC's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | +5.2% | -18.4% | -17.8% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | +33.5% | -31.9% | -13.6% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.2% | +72.4% | -31.7% | -1.0% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +89.4% | -43.3% | +0.3% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | +114.6% | +89.5% | +94.9% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | +19.9% | -11.9% | -0.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSGS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVTC's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSGS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 0.44x | 0.76x | 0.28x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.64 | $80.67 | $38.56 | $193.39 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $60.04 | $22.83 | $141.81 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +99.7% | +60.6% | +75.5% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.4 | 56.6 | 40.6 | 28.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 342K | 431K | 902K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNDO and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSGS as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for EVTC (target: $37) vs 0.4% for CSGS (target: $81). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs EVTC's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $80.70 | $37.00 | $203.75 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 18 | 22 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +21.6% | +1.6% | +0.8% | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.22 | $1.33 | $0.20 | $2.25 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.6% | +4.8% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNDO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MNDO vs CSGS vs EVTC vs JKHY vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CSG Systems International, Inc. (CSGS) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus CSG Systems International, Inc. 's 9. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, CSG Systems International, Inc.
(CSGS) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSGS returned +114. 6% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning EVTC is approximately 1003% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for CSG Systems International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EVERTEC, Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVTC leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSGS leads at 24. 5% versus 10. 7% for MNDO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDO leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus CSG Systems International, Inc. 's 9. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 58. 4% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the highest yield at 21. 6%, versus 0. 8% for EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC).
09Is MNDO or CSGS or EVTC or JKHY or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, FIS: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNDO and CSGS and EVTC and JKHY and FIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.