Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Communication Equipment
MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $21M | $149M | $2.77B | $283M | $364.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $2.10B | $861M | $3.04B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-201M | $96M | $-170M | $11.08B |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 15.5% | 79.2% | 18.1% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 4.3% | 12.8% | 4.2% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 2.5x | 15.9x | — | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $929K | $1.00B | $76M | $789M | $29.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $83M | $457M | $233M | $9.47B |
MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) | 100 | 7.2 | -92.8% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Conduent Incorporat… (CNDT) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 192.7 | +92.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNDO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07 vs TTEC's 1.84, lower leverage
TTEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (2.5x vs 22.2x)
NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +80.5% vs MNDO's -34.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CNDT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 0.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 301.7% 10Y total return vs MNDO's 66.7%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4%
- 18.8% margin vs TTEC's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs TTEC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs TTEC's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield, vs CSCO's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs MNDO's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs TTEC's -14.2%, ROIC 13.0% vs 6.2% |
MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories
TTEC leads 1 • MNDO leads 0 • NTCT leads 0 • CNDT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 3035.1x MNDO's $19M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTEC's -9.6%. On growth, CSCO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $2.1B | $861M | $3.0B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $178M | $171M | $321M | $16.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$201M | $96M | -$170M | $11.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $34M | $275M | -$147M | $12.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +15.5% | +79.2% | +18.1% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +4.3% | +12.8% | +4.2% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -9.6% | +11.1% | -5.6% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +1.6% | +32.0% | -4.8% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -7.1% | -0.5% | -3.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.4% | -6.6% | +11.9% | -146.0% | +29.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TTEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 79% valuation discount to CSCO's 36.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNDT's 2.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSCO's 26.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $149M | $2.8B | $283M | $365.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $839M | $385.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.77x | -0.77x | -7.57x | -1.61x | 36.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.52x | 15.87x | — | 22.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.68x | 5.76x | — | 2.54x | 26.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 0.07x | 3.36x | 0.09x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.31x | 1.78x | 0.35x | 7.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.20x | 1.82x | 13.11x | — | 27.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-100 for TTEC. MNDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEC's 8.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs CNDT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | -99.6% | +6.1% | -20.6% | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.6% | -14.2% | +4.3% | -7.1% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +6.2% | -19.3% | +7.2% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +7.5% | -18.5% | +7.6% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 8.86x | 0.05x | 0.95x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $917M | -$381M | $556M | $20.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $83M | $457M | $233M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $929,000 | $1.0B | $76M | $789M | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -4.22x | 55.89x | -1.85x | 9.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $556 for TTEC. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +80.5% total return vs MNDO's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 27.9% vs TTEC's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | -14.3% | +42.6% | -3.7% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | -21.9% | +80.5% | -7.6% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.2% | -88.9% | +30.3% | -36.2% | +109.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | -94.4% | +42.9% | -75.7% | +87.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | -61.8% | +66.6% | -88.6% | +301.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | -51.9% | +9.2% | -13.9% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNDO and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTEC's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs TTEC's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 1.84x | 1.12x | 1.72x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.64 | $5.60 | $39.24 | $2.98 | $94.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $1.98 | $19.98 | $1.15 | $59.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +54.6% | +97.6% | +61.4% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.4 | 52.9 | 68.6 | 65.6 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 662K | 552K | 1.2M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNDO and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTEC as "Hold", NTCT as "Hold", CNDT as "Hold", CSCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1016.7% upside for TTEC (target: $34) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29). For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs CSCO's 1.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.17 | $29.00 | — | $96.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 21 | 8 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +21.6% | — | — | +3.4% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.22 | — | — | $0.06 | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +10.2% | +2.0% |
CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTEC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MNDO vs TTEC vs NTCT vs CNDT vs CSCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 36. 1x. On forward P/E, TTEC Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +87. 2%, compared to -94. 4% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +301. 7% versus CNDT's -88. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus TTEC Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning TTEC is approximately 2571% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 9% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TTEC Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 8% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSCO leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTCT leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TTEC Holdings, Inc.
(TTEC) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Cisco Systems, Inc. — 19. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEC: 1016. 7% to $34. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield), CNDT (3. 4% yield), CSCO (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TTEC, NTCT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNDO or TTEC or NTCT or CNDT or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, TTEC: -61. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNDO and TTEC and NTCT and CNDT and CSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; TTEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO, CNDT, CSCO pay a dividend while TTEC, NTCT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.