MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$2.31B
5Y Perf.-25.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MNR vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$611.92B
5Y Perf.+36.4%
MNR vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MNR | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $2.31B | $611.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.23B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $235M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 54.6% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.16B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $10.68B |
MNR vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MNR
XOM
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 100 | 74.6 | -25.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNR vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MNR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Exxon Mobil Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
The Income Pick
MNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 13.5%
- Rev growth 21.2%, EPS growth -42.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- Beta 0.20, yield 13.5%, current ratio 1.05x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 102.6% 10Y total return vs MNR's 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.20, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
- Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 58.5%)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNR | 21.2% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% |
| Value | MNR | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 14.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | MNR | 19.0% margin vs XOM's 8.9% |
| Stability / Safety | XOM | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 58.5%) |
| Dividends | MNR | 13.5% yield, vs XOM's 2.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | XOM | +39.9% vs MNR's +16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNR | 6.9% ROA vs XOM's 6.4%, ROIC 10.1% vs 8.6% |
MNR vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MNR vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMNRLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
1leads
MNRMach Natural Resource…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MNR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MNR5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MNR7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XOM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 262.4x MNR's $1.2B. MNR is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, MNR holds the edge at +26.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $597M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $235M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $157M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.6% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -11.0% |
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, MNR trades at a 41% valuation discount to XOM's 21.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNR's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.8x.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $611.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $644.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.61x | 21.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.47x | 14.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.47x | 10.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.97x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.78x | 25.92x |
MNR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNR's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNR scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.03x | 69.44x |
MNR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,589 for MNR. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +39.9% total return vs MNR's +16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 12.7% vs MNR's 1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.9% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.8% | +39.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +43.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +160.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | +102.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.9% | +12.7% |
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNR's 0.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNR currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.60 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.46 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 778K | 18.9M |
Evenly matched — MNR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNR as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.2% upside for MNR (target: $19) vs 11.6% for XOM (target: $161). For income investors, MNR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.52% vs XOM's 2.77%.
| Metric | MNRMach Natural Reso… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $161.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.5% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.86 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
Evenly matched — MNR and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XOM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallMach Natural Resources LP (MNR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MNR vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNR or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the stronger pick with 21.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNR or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the cheapest at 12.
6x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 21. 6x. On forward P/E, Mach Natural Resources LP is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNR or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +160.
6%, compared to +5. 9% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +102. 6% versus MNR's +5. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNR or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Mach Natural Resources LP's 0. 20β — meaning MNR is approximately -202% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 58% for Mach Natural Resources LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNR or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is pulling ahead at 21.
2% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -42. 6% for Mach Natural Resources LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNR leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNR or XOM?
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
3% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNR leads at 28. 5% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNR leads at 33. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNR or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNR: 38. 2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNR or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 2. 8% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is MNR or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 8% yield, +102. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +102. 6%, MNR: +5. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNR and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNR is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MNR: 26.1% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(MNR: 19.0% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MNR: 12.6x · XOM: 21.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.