Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Auto - Parts
MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $14.22B | $167.94B | $61.60B | $944M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87B | $25.90B | $18.52B | $1.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $4.48B | $2.91B | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 37.3% | 35.4% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 26.0% | 19.3% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 52.1x | 29.3x | 18.7x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $449M | $15.50B | $6.55B | $295M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $11.13B | $1.25B | $161M |
MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modine Manufacturin… (MOD) | 100 | 5040.2 | +4940.2% |
| Amphenol Corporation (APH) | 100 | 565.9 | +465.9% |
| TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 25.2% 10Y total return vs APH's 9.0%
- +195.3% vs THRM's +19.1%
APH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.7%, EPS growth 74.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 51.7% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6%
- 17.3% margin vs THRM's 1.5%
- 13.6% ROA vs THRM's 1.6%, ROIC 28.3% vs 7.3%
TEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 1.3%
- Beta 1.58, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.56x
- 1.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
THRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 40.9%, current ratio 1.92x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 18.7x)
- Beta 1.43 vs MOD's 2.51, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.7% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs THRM's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs MOD's 2.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.3% vs THRM's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs THRM's 1.6%, ROIC 28.3% vs 7.3% |
MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APH leads in 2 of 6 categories
THRM leads 1 • MOD leads 1 • TEL leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.9B annually — 16.9x THRM's $1.5B. APH is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to THRM's 1.5%. On growth, APH holds the edge at +58.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $25.9B | $18.5B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $399M | $7.9B | $4.3B | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $4.5B | $2.9B | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $4.6B | $3.4B | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +37.3% | +35.4% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +26.0% | +19.3% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +17.3% | +15.7% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +17.9% | +18.3% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.5% | +58.4% | +14.5% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +24.1% | +66.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
THRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.1x trailing earnings, TEL trades at a 57% valuation discount to MOD's 78.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, THRM's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MOD's 40.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.2B | $167.9B | $61.6B | $944M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.6B | $172.3B | $66.9B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.84x | 40.90x | 34.08x | 51.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.06x | 29.29x | 18.72x | 11.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.47x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.41x | 24.99x | 16.52x | 8.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.50x | 7.27x | 3.60x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.83x | 12.92x | 4.93x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 109.97x | 38.36x | 19.23x | 15.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APH delivers a 34.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $3 for THRM. THRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APH's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOD scores 7/9 vs THRM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +34.6% | +22.5% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +13.6% | +11.5% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +28.3% | +14.1% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.1% | +25.5% | +16.9% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 1.15x | 0.51x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $378M | $4.4B | $5.3B | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $11.1B | $1.3B | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $449M | $15.5B | $6.5B | $295M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.57x | 13.54x | 31.48x | 5.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOD five years ago would be worth $158,525 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,200 for THRM. Over the past 12 months, MOD leads with a +195.3% total return vs THRM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOD at 136.8% vs THRM's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.5% | -2.0% | -9.7% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +195.3% | +70.0% | +42.1% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1227.7% | +267.6% | +77.5% | -48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1485.2% | +308.8% | +60.9% | -58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2518.0% | +899.3% | +291.2% | -14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +136.8% | +54.3% | +21.1% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOD and THRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
THRM is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOD's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs THRM's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.51x | 1.62x | 1.58x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $287.30 | $167.04 | $252.56 | $39.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.48 | $79.27 | $147.80 | $25.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +81.8% | +83.1% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 45.1 | 49.8 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 950K | 8.3M | 2.3M | 239K |
Analyst Outlook
TEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOD as "Buy", APH as "Buy", TEL as "Buy", THRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.0% upside for APH (target: $180) vs -8.9% for MOD (target: $246). For income investors, TEL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.28% vs APH's 0.46%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.60 | $180.33 | $262.57 | $36.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 29 | 29 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $2.69 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% | +2.2% | +1.1% |
APH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). THRM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MOD vs APH vs TEL vs THRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOD or APH or TEL or THRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). TE Connectivity Ltd. (TEL) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOD or APH or TEL or THRM?
On trailing P/E, TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) is the cheapest at 34. 1x versus Modine Manufacturing Company at 78. 8x. On forward P/E, Gentherm Incorporated is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOD or APH or TEL or THRM?
Over the past 5 years, Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) delivered a total return of +1485%, compared to -58.
0% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOD returned +25. 2% versus THRM's -14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOD or APH or TEL or THRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
43β versus Modine Manufacturing Company's 2. 51β — meaning MOD is approximately 75% more volatile than THRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 115% for Amphenol Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOD or APH or TEL or THRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.
7% versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amphenol Corporation grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to -70. 9% for Gentherm Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOD or APH or TEL or THRM?
Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
5% net margin versus 1. 2% for Gentherm Incorporated — meaning it keeps 18. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus 5. 2% for THRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APH leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOD or APH or TEL or THRM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) trades at 11.
6x forward P/E versus 52. 1x for Modine Manufacturing Company — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APH: 32. 0% to $180. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOD or APH or TEL or THRM?
In this comparison, TEL (1.
3% yield), APH (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MOD, THRM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOD or APH or TEL or THRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TE Connectivity Ltd.
(TEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 3% yield, +291. 2% 10Y return). Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEL: +291. 2%, MOD: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOD and APH and TEL and THRM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOD (Consumer Cyclical) and APH (Technology) and TEL (Technology) and THRM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TEL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TEL pays a dividend while MOD, APH, THRM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.