Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Construction
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Construction | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $14.22B | $944M | $10.58B | $9.93B | $19.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87B | $1.53B | $1.62B | $4.26B | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $23M | $118M | $40M | $345M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | 23.6% | 26.2% | 32.6% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 4.7% | 10.4% | 8.5% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | 52.1x | 11.6x | 65.3x | 16.4x | 45.5x |
| Total Debt | $449M | $295M | $433M | $3.74B | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $161M | $13K | $366M | $503M |
MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modine Manufacturin… (MOD) | 100 | 5040.2 | +4940.2% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
| AAON, Inc. (AAON) | 100 | 357.9 | +257.9% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 25.2% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
- +195.3% vs THRM's +19.1%
THRM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 40.9%, current ratio 1.92x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 16.4x)
AAON is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth -36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- 20.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.56 vs MOD's 2.51
BWXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.5%
- PEG 10.61 vs AAON's 12.01
- Beta 1.60, yield 0.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- 10.2% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.2% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs MOD's 2.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs AAON's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.3% vs THRM's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 10.1% vs 7.4% |
MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
THRM leads in 1 of 6 categories
MOD leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • BWXT leads 1 • AAON leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AAON and BWXT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 2.8x THRM's $1.5B. BWXT is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, AAON holds the edge at +54.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $4.3B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $399M | $127M | $228M | $644M | $458M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $23M | $118M | $40M | $345M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $79M | -$145M | $203M | $328M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +23.6% | +26.2% | +32.6% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +4.7% | +10.4% | +8.5% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +1.5% | +7.3% | +0.9% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +5.1% | -9.0% | +4.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.5% | +11.3% | +54.3% | -2.5% | +26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | — | +37.1% | -36.1% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
THRM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 51.4x trailing earnings, THRM trades at a 92% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWXT offers better value at 13.62x vs AAON's 18.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.2B | $944M | $10.6B | $9.9B | $19.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.6B | $1.1B | $11.0B | $13.3B | $20.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.84x | 51.35x | 100.19x | 628.45x | 58.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.06x | 11.57x | 65.28x | 16.40x | 45.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 18.43x | — | 13.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.41x | 8.21x | 48.81x | 14.33x | 47.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.50x | 0.63x | 7.34x | 2.33x | 6.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.83x | 1.32x | 12.00x | 2.79x | 15.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 109.97x | 15.45x | — | 48.95x | 65.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MOD and THRM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. THRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWXT's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOD scores 7/9 vs AAON's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +3.2% | +13.4% | +1.2% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +1.6% | +7.4% | +0.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +7.3% | +9.4% | +7.4% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.1% | +8.2% | +12.4% | +8.6% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.41x | 0.48x | 1.11x | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $378M | $134M | $433M | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $161M | $13,000 | $366M | $503M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $449M | $295M | $433M | $3.7B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.57x | 5.83x | 11.27x | 1.08x | 10.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOD five years ago would be worth $158,525 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,200 for THRM. Over the past 12 months, MOD leads with a +195.3% total return vs THRM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOD at 136.8% vs THRM's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.5% | -16.3% | +63.3% | +0.6% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +195.3% | +19.1% | +35.5% | +37.6% | +95.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1227.7% | -48.0% | +101.6% | +62.7% | +226.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1485.2% | -58.0% | +196.3% | +29.5% | +224.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2518.0% | -14.9% | +612.1% | +772.5% | +551.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +136.8% | -19.6% | +26.3% | +17.6% | +48.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOD's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs THRM's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.51x | 1.43x | 1.83x | 0.56x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $287.30 | $39.48 | $148.88 | $208.51 | $241.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.48 | $25.47 | $62.00 | $140.50 | $105.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +78.0% | +86.8% | +99.5% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 59.7 | 59.4 | 51.2 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 950K | 239K | 965K | 1.6M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
BWXT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOD as "Buy", THRM as "Buy", AAON as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", BWXT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.0% upside for THRM (target: $37) vs -8.9% for MOD (target: $246). For income investors, BWXT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.48% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.60 | $36.67 | $119.00 | $193.81 | $210.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 | 5 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +0.3% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.39 | $0.60 | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.1% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
THRM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MOD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MOD vs THRM vs AAON vs GTLS vs BWXT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) offers the better valuation at 51. 4x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT?
On trailing P/E, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the cheapest at 51.
4x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Gentherm Incorporated is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BWX Technologies, Inc. wins at 10. 61x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT?
Over the past 5 years, Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) delivered a total return of +1485%, compared to -58.
0% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOD returned +25. 2% versus THRM's -14. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Modine Manufacturing Company's 2. 51β — meaning MOD is approximately 351% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AAON, Inc.
(AAON) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BWX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT?
BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 3% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus 5. 2% for THRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLS leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 10. 61x versus AAON, Inc. 's 12. 01x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 65. 3x for AAON, Inc. — 53. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for THRM: 19. 0% to $36. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT?
In this comparison, BWXT (0.
5% yield), AAON (0. 3% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. MOD, THRM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOD or THRM or AAON or GTLS or BWXT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, MOD: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOD and THRM and AAON and GTLS and BWXT?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOD (Consumer Cyclical) and THRM (Consumer Cyclical) and AAON (Industrials) and GTLS (Industrials) and BWXT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.