Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $89M | $2.35B | $203M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $48M | $867M | $90M | $417M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $5M | $169M | $14M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 54.7% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 12.2% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 19.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 19.4x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $73M | $327M | $52M | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $20M | $185M | $119M | $252M |
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ) | 100 | 169.6 | +69.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 141.9 | +41.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 246.8 | +146.8% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +77.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
IROQ is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs CFFN's 5.80
- NIM 3.1% vs CFFN's 1.8%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 109.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- 4.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
MOFG leads 1 • IROQ leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • CFFN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 17.9x IROQ's $48M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $48M | $867M | $90M | $417M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $7M | $241M | $9M | $97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $5M | $169M | $14M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $4M | $225M | $11M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +54.7% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +12.2% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +19.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +8.9% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +13.5% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +115.0% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 30% valuation discount to IROQ's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $89M | $2.4B | $203M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $142M | $2.5B | $136M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 19.38x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 15.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | — | 10.80x | 11.78x | 11.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.92x | 2.85x | 7.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.69x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 29.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 1.84x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.02x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 13.65x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 20.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOFG delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for IROQ. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IROQ scores 7/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.0% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +2.9% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +3.9% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.89x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 1.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | $53M | $142M | -$67M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $20M | $185M | $119M | $252M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $73M | $327M | $52M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.26x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOFG five years ago would be worth $17,220 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,144 for CFFN. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -1.6% | +9.3% | +21.5% | +20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | +10.9% | +9.0% | +45.6% | +44.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +82.2% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +60.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +71.2% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +59.5% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +22.1% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and IROQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IROQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs IROQ's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.04x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $29.00 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $7.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $23.21 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +91.6% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 34.4 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 44K | 236K | 40K | 926K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and CFFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", CFFN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, CFFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs IROQ's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | — | $46.00 | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 10 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.5% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $0.41 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MOFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MOFG vs IROQ vs NBTB vs CZWI vs CFFN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus IF Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN?
Over the past 5 years, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) delivered a total return of +72. 2%, compared to -18. 6% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 3578% more volatile than IROQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IF Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 140. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 1. 5% for IF Bancorp, Inc. (IROQ).
09Is MOFG or IROQ or NBTB or CZWI or CFFN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IF Bancorp, Inc.
(IROQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IROQ: +59. 5%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and IROQ and NBTB and CZWI and CFFN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IROQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.