Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs NDAQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
MOFG vs NDAQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $50.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $8.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $1.91B |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 28.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 22.6x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $9.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $814M |
MOFG vs NDAQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 245.4 | +145.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs NDAQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 22.6x)
- 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NDAQ's 1.2%
- +77.2% vs NDAQ's +15.6%
NDAQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 60.1%
- 351.9% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 112.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 22.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NDAQ's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.2% vs NDAQ's +15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs NDAQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MOFG vs NDAQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NDAQ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NDAQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.2B annually — 39.9x MOFG's $206M. NDAQ is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +28.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +33.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $50.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $59.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 28.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | 22.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 6.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 4.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 25.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NDAQ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NDAQ delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for MOFG. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $814M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $9.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 14.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,172 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,105 for MOFG. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.2% total return vs NDAQ's +15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs NDAQ's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.2% | +15.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +67.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.1% | +71.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.8% | +351.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and NDAQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NDAQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NDAQ's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $101.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $77.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 52.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MOFG and NDAQ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOFG as "Buy" and NDAQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.5% upside for NDAQ (target: $115) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, MOFG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $114.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.2% |
NDAQ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOFG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MOFG vs NDAQ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or NDAQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) offers the better valuation at 28. 9x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or NDAQ?
On forward P/E, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or NDAQ?
Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +71. 7%, compared to +71. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus MOFG's +109. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or NDAQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 65% more volatile than NDAQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or NDAQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nasdaq, Inc. grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or NDAQ?
Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NDAQ leads at 28. 4% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NDAQ leads at 47. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or NDAQ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDAQ: 28. 5% to $114. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or NDAQ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 2% for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ).
09Is MOFG or NDAQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 1. 2% yield, +347. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NDAQ: +347. 6%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and NDAQ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.