Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Banks - Regional
MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $50.59B | $88.45B | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $8.22B | $12.64B | $279M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $1.91B | $3.30B | $51M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 47.9% | 61.9% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | -40.8% | 28.4% | 38.7% | 21.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.8x | 22.6x | 19.5x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $117M | $9.93B | $20.28B | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $814M | $837M | $31M |
MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) | 100 | 245.4 | +145.4% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 178.7 | +78.7% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 346.3 | +246.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.6% vs ICE's -10.4%
NDAQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 60.1%
- 347.6% 10Y total return vs FBIZ's 161.7%
- 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.33 vs MOFG's 1.29
FBIZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and bank quality is your priority.
- PEG 0.36 vs ICE's 2.19
- NIM 3.3% vs MOFG's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.36 vs 2.19
- 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.5x), PEG 0.36 vs 2.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs ICE's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 1 • NDAQ leads 1 • MOFG leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 61.3x MOFG's $206M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $8.2B | $12.6B | $279M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $74M | $3.1B | $6.5B | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $1.9B | $3.3B | $51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $79M | $2.0B | $4.3B | $53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +47.9% | +61.9% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | +28.4% | +38.7% | +21.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | +21.8% | +26.1% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +24.2% | +33.9% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.6% | +33.8% | +23.1% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 68% valuation discount to NDAQ's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $50.6B | $88.4B | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $59.7B | $107.9B | $702M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.93x | 28.80x | 27.06x | 9.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.77x | 22.65x | 19.48x | 9.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.70x | 3.05x | 0.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.14x | 16.71x | 11.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.94x | 6.16x | 7.00x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 4.19x | 3.08x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.74x | 25.44x | 20.62x | 7.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NDAQ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NDAQ delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for MOFG. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +15.9% | +11.6% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +6.4% | +2.3% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.4% | +8.1% | +7.5% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +10.2% | +9.5% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.81x | 0.70x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | $9.1B | $19.4B | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $814M | $837M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117M | $9.9B | $20.3B | $259M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 14.11x | 6.53x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,335 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs ICE's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs ICE's 14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | -7.6% | -2.1% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.6% | +14.6% | -10.4% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.6% | +67.4% | +50.8% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +70.4% | +43.4% | +130.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +347.6% | +225.3% | +161.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.0% | +18.7% | +14.7% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOFG and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 82.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.78x | 0.33x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.69 | $101.79 | $189.35 | $60.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.52 | $77.09 | $143.17 | $45.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +87.4% | +82.5% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.9 | 52.6 | 38.8 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.3M | 3.0M | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ICE and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", NDAQ as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for NDAQ (target: $115) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, FBIZ offers the higher dividend yield at 2.09% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.25 | $114.60 | $195.71 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 36 | 36 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 13 | 14 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $1.04 | $1.93 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.2% | +1.6% | +0.3% |
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FBIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MOFG vs NDAQ vs ICE vs FBIZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Nasdaq, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +43. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus MOFG's +109. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 295% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nasdaq, Inc.
(NDAQ) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nasdaq, Inc. grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDAQ: 28. 8% to $114. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 1. 2% for Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ).
09Is MOFG or NDAQ or ICE or FBIZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOFG and NDAQ and ICE and FBIZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.