Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Consumer Electronics
Banks - Regional
MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Consumer Electronics | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $810M | $46.83B | $4.22T | $34.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $500K | $7.46B | $451.44B | $13.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $1.74B | $122.58B | $2.41B |
| Gross Margin | -270.2% | 59.1% | 47.9% | 59.2% |
| Operating Margin | -31.6% | 26.5% | 32.6% | 22.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.5x | 33.8x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $186K | $165M | $112.38B | $18.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $2.28B | $35.93B | $3.01B |
MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movano Inc. (MOVE) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) | 100 | 184.2 | +84.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 235.3 | +135.3% |
| Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) | 100 | 135.8 | +35.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +47.8% vs GRMN's +31.7%
GRMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 17.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.30, yield 1.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs MOVE's -44.6%
AAPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 11.8% 10Y total return vs GRMN's 5.6%
- PEG 1.89 vs GRMN's 2.39
- 27.2% margin vs MOVE's -34.1%
- Beta 0.99 vs MOVE's 1.98
FITB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 3.4%
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 25.5x)
- 3.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs GRMN's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs MOVE's -44.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs MOVE's -34.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs MOVE's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs GRMN's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.8% vs GRMN's +31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs MOVE's -306.8% |
MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FITB leads 2 • MOVE leads 0 • GRMN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 902884.0x MOVE's $500,000. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOVE's -34.1%. On growth, MOVE holds the edge at +60.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $500,000 | $7.5B | $451.4B | $13.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $2.2B | $160.0B | $3.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $1.7B | $122.6B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $1.5B | $129.2B | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +59.1% | +47.9% | +59.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.6% | +26.5% | +32.6% | +22.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.1% | +23.3% | +27.2% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.1% | +19.4% | +28.6% | +18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | +14.2% | +16.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.0% | +21.5% | +21.8% | +16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FITB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, FITB trades at a 58% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AAPL offers better value at 2.16x vs GRMN's 2.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $810M | $46.8B | $4.22T | $34.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $802M | $44.7B | $4.30T | $50.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -34.49x | 28.27x | 38.53x | 16.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.55x | 33.78x | 16.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.64x | 2.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.66x | 29.68x | 14.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 799.74x | 6.46x | 10.14x | 2.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 110.15x | 5.24x | 58.50x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.36x | 42.73x | 14.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MOVE. GRMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs FITB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | +19.9% | +146.7% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | +16.2% | +34.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +22.0% | +67.4% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +21.6% | +69.6% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.02x | 1.52x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$2.1B | $76.4B | $16.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $2.3B | $35.9B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186,000 | $165M | $112.4B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.38x | — | — | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MOVE and GRMN and AAPL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,527 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for MOVE. Over the past 12 months, MOVE leads with a +47.8% total return vs GRMN's +31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRMN at 34.6% vs MOVE's -58.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.2% | +20.4% | +6.2% | +7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.8% | +31.7% | +45.3% | +43.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +143.7% | +67.4% | +126.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +82.5% | +125.3% | +37.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +558.3% | +1175.4% | +253.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.4% | +34.6% | +18.7% | +31.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOVE's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs MOVE's 38.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 1.30x | 0.99x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.87 | $273.32 | $288.61 | $55.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.67 | $184.47 | $193.25 | $36.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.6% | +88.8% | +99.6% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 35.2 | 67.3 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 738K | 39.6M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
FITB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOVE as "Buy", GRMN as "Hold", AAPL as "Buy", FITB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.1% upside for FITB (target: $57) vs 10.3% for AAPL (target: $317). For income investors, FITB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.37% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $269.00 | $317.11 | $56.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 28 | 110 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% | +0.4% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 14 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.43 | $1.03 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +2.1% | +1.8% |
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FITB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MOVE vs GRMN vs AAPL vs FITB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 6% for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Movano Inc. (MOVE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB?
On trailing P/E, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the cheapest at 16.
2x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Fifth Third Bancorp is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apple Inc. wins at 1. 89x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 39x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +125. 3%, compared to -98. 3% for Movano Inc. (MOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1175% versus MOVE's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Movano Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning MOVE is approximately 101% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garmin Ltd.
(GRMN) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus 5. 6% for Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Movano Inc. grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to -2. 5% for Fifth Third Bancorp. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRMN leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -23. 4% for Movano Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus -23. 9% for MOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FITB leads at 59. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 89x versus Garmin Ltd. 's 2. 39x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FITB: 11. 1% to $56. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB?
In this comparison, FITB (3.
4% yield), GRMN (1. 4% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. MOVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MOVE or GRMN or AAPL or FITB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1175% 10Y return). Movano Inc. (MOVE) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1175%, MOVE: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOVE and GRMN and AAPL and FITB?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOVE (Healthcare) and GRMN (Technology) and AAPL (Technology) and FITB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRMN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; FITB is a mid-cap deep-value stock. GRMN, FITB pay a dividend while MOVE, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.