Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $868M | $20.26B | $9.28B | $2.52B | $28.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $11.66B | $2.52B | $902M | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $2.67B | $519M | $169M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 37.6% | 44.1% | 73.6% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 17.9% | 26.0% | 24.3% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 6.2x | 18.7x | 11.5x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $4.01B | $0.00 | $327M | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $599M | $102M | $185M | $798M |
MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 164.5% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
- NIM 3.2% vs NBTB's 3.1%
- +31.1% vs FISV's -68.0%
FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- 22.9% margin vs FISV's 15.2%
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87
- 17.0% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.8%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs JKHY's 1.86
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs FISV's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.1% vs FISV's -68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.8% |
MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • MPB leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 60.6x MPB's $348M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FISV's 15.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $11.7B | $2.5B | $902M | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $4.1B | $810M | $241M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $2.7B | $519M | $169M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $2.8B | $728M | $225M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +37.6% | +44.1% | +73.6% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +17.9% | +26.0% | +24.3% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +22.9% | +20.6% | +18.8% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +23.9% | +28.9% | +24.9% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +30.1% | +8.7% | — | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +30.6% | +12.5% | +39.5% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $20.3B | $9.3B | $2.5B | $28.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $881M | $23.7B | $9.2B | $2.7B | $57.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.44x | 52.27x | 20.55x | 14.47x | 8.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 6.24x | 18.72x | 11.54x | 6.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.14x | 2.04x | 2.06x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 6.50x | 11.87x | 11.03x | 6.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 1.90x | 3.91x | 2.90x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.46x | 4.40x | 1.29x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.28x | 7.21x | 15.78x | 11.49x | 6.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +18.4% | +24.0% | +9.5% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +7.5% | +17.0% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +6.0% | +21.0% | +7.9% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +6.6% | +22.7% | +2.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.29x | — | 0.17x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $3.4B | -$102M | $142M | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $599M | $102M | $185M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $4.0B | $0 | $327M | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | 21.16x | 122.37x | 1.05x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $14,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MPB leads with a +31.1% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPB at 14.3% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | -38.9% | -27.4% | +17.6% | -18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | -49.4% | -27.5% | +18.3% | -68.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | -18.9% | -15.1% | +48.5% | -54.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | -67.3% | -14.9% | +44.4% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | -25.6% | +74.8% | +108.5% | +1.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | -6.8% | -5.3% | +14.1% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JKHY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.61x | 0.10x | 0.76x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.22 | $82.74 | $193.39 | $48.27 | $177.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.02 | $37.91 | $124.63 | $39.20 | $51.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +47.4% | +66.3% | +99.8% | +30.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 30.8 | 27.5 | 63.1 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 5.6M | 1.2M | 266K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JKHY's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $62.88 | $194.63 | $46.00 | $71.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 37 | 22 | 10 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +4.2% | +1.8% | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 22 | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $1.63 | $2.25 | $1.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +0.4% | +20.5% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +44. 4%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning FISV is approximately 743% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
2% yield), NBTB (3. 0% yield), MPB (2. 3% yield), JKHY (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPB and FIS and JKHY and NBTB and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MPB, FIS, JKHY, NBTB pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.