Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MPB logo
MPB
FIS logo
FIS
JKHY logo
JKHY
NBTB logo
NBTB
FISV logo
FISV
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$868M
5Y Perf.+85.9%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-44.9%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.28B
5Y Perf.-30.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$28.76B
5Y Perf.-13.2%

MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPB logoMPB
FIS logoFIS
JKHY logoJKHY
NBTB logoNBTB
FISV logoFISV
IndustryBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$868M$20.26B$9.28B$2.52B$28.76B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$11.66B$2.52B$902M$21.09B
Net Income (TTM)$56M$2.67B$519M$169M$3.20B
Gross Margin63.6%37.6%44.1%73.6%60.8%
Operating Margin20.5%17.9%26.0%24.3%24.4%
Forward P/E10.8x6.2x18.7x11.5x6.6x
Total Debt$59M$4.01B$0.00$327M$29.12B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$599M$102M$185M$798M

MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPB
FIS
JKHY
NBTB
FISV
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB)100185.9+85.9%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10069.7-30.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Fiserv, Inc. (FISV)10055.1-44.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS and JKHY are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MPB, NBTB, and FISV also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 164.5% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
  • NIM 3.2% vs NBTB's 3.1%
  • +31.1% vs FISV's -68.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • 22.9% margin vs FISV's 15.2%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Growth Play

JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 1.27x
  • Beta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87
  • 17.0% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6%
Best for: growth
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
The Value Pick

FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs JKHY's 1.86
  • Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.64
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6%
ValueFISV logoFISVLower P/E (6.6x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.64
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs FISV's 15.2%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.10 vs FISV's 0.87
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MPB logoMPB+31.1% vs FISV's -68.0%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.8%

MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MPBMid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
36.4%$5M
Debit Card
27.1%$4M
Mortgage Banking
19.4%$3M
Deposit Account
17.1%$2M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FISVFiserv, Inc.
FY 2024
Processing And Services
81.3%$16.6B
Product
18.7%$3.8B

MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPBLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 60.6x MPB's $348M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FISV's 15.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$11.7B$2.5B$902M$21.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$4.1B$810M$241M$7.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$2.7B$519M$169M$3.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$2.8B$728M$225M$4.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.6%+37.6%+44.1%+73.6%+60.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+17.9%+26.0%+24.3%+24.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+22.9%+20.6%+18.8%+15.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+23.9%+28.9%+24.9%+19.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+8.7%-2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+30.6%+12.5%+39.5%-29.1%
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$868M$20.3B$9.3B$2.5B$28.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$881M$23.7B$9.2B$2.7B$57.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.44x52.27x20.55x14.47x8.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x6.24x18.72x11.54x6.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.14x2.04x2.06x0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x6.50x11.87x11.03x6.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.66x1.90x3.91x2.90x1.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.46x4.40x1.29x1.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.28x7.21x15.78x11.49x6.63x
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+18.4%+24.0%+9.5%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+7.5%+17.0%+1.1%+4.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+6.0%+21.0%+7.9%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+6.6%+22.7%+2.4%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966675
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.29x0.17x1.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$3.4B-$102M$142M$28.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$599M$102M$185M$798M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$4.0B$0$327M$29.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.57x21.16x122.37x1.05x6.39x
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $14,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MPB leads with a +31.1% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPB at 14.3% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%-38.9%-27.4%+17.6%-18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%-49.4%-27.5%+18.3%-68.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.2%-18.9%-15.1%+48.5%-54.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.8%-67.3%-14.9%+44.4%-50.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%-25.6%+74.8%+108.5%+1.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%-6.8%-5.3%+14.1%-23.0%
MPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JKHY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.61x0.10x0.76x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.22$82.74$193.39$48.27$177.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.02$37.91$124.63$39.20$51.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+47.4%+66.3%+99.8%+30.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.930.827.563.140.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded142K5.6M1.2M266K5.7M
Evenly matched — JKHY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JKHY's 1.76%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$62.88$194.63$46.00$71.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts237221060
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+4.2%+1.8%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises112213
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$1.63$2.25$1.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+7.0%+0.4%+0.4%+20.5%
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPB vs FIS vs JKHY vs NBTB vs FISV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?

On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?

Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) delivered a total return of +44. 4%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning FISV is approximately 743% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?

NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), NBTB (3. 0% yield), MPB (2. 3% yield), JKHY (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MPB or FIS or JKHY or NBTB or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPB and FIS and JKHY and NBTB and FISV?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MPB, FIS, JKHY, NBTB pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.