Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $868M | $636M | $355.61B | $2.52B | $4.50B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $281M | $49.28B | $902M | $1.89B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $59M | $13.70B | $169M | $392M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 66.7% | 61.7% | 73.6% | 67.4% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 25.7% | 29.3% | 24.3% | 25.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 9.8x | 25.3x | 11.5x | 11.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $258M | $45.49B | $327M | $1.30B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $58M | $10.27B | $185M | $271M | $343.34B |
MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 166.3 | +66.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 49.7%, current ratio 8.76x
- Beta 0.68, yield 3.9%, current ratio 8.76x
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
- 13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%
NBTB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +37.8% vs KO's +17.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- PEG 0.81 vs 0.82
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.81 vs 0.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs MPB's 16.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8% |
MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFIS leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • MPB leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • FULT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 996.4x PFIS's $281M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPB's 16.2%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $281M | $49.3B | $902M | $1.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $80M | $15.5B | $241M | $529M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $59M | $13.7B | $169M | $392M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $43M | $12.6B | $225M | $267M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +66.7% | +61.7% | +73.6% | +67.4% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +25.7% | +29.3% | +24.3% | +25.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +21.0% | +27.8% | +18.8% | +20.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +15.4% | +25.5% | +24.9% | +14.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +95.1% | +18.2% | +39.5% | +47.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PFIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $636M | $355.6B | $2.5B | $4.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $881M | $836M | $390.8B | $2.7B | $5.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.44x | 10.80x | 27.18x | 14.47x | 11.23x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 9.83x | 25.27x | 11.54x | 11.49x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 2.43x | 2.06x | 0.80x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.57x | 26.39x | 11.03x | 10.43x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 2.26x | 7.42x | 2.90x | 2.38x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.23x | 10.40x | 1.29x | 1.23x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.28x | 14.66x | 67.15x | 11.49x | 15.81x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +11.8% | +41.1% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.2% | +13.1% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.7% | +15.8% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +2.4% | +17.3% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.50x | 1.33x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $200M | $35.2B | $142M | $1.0B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $58M | $10.3B | $185M | $271M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $258M | $45.5B | $327M | $1.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | 0.77x | 10.70x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,577 for MPB. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +34.4% | +20.3% | +17.6% | +21.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +34.3% | +17.2% | +18.3% | +37.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +66.1% | +47.0% | +48.5% | +96.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +67.6% | +65.6% | +44.4% | +61.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +118.8% | +121.1% | +108.5% | +114.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +18.4% | +13.7% | +14.1% | +25.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.68x | -0.20x | 0.76x | 0.99x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.22 | $63.91 | $84.04 | $48.27 | $23.48 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.02 | $43.64 | $65.35 | $39.20 | $16.60 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +99.4% | +98.3% | +99.8% | +99.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 65.7 | 60.6 | 63.1 | 68.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 58K | 12.7M | 266K | 1.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PFIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", PFIS as "Hold", KO as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -11.8% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $56.00 | $86.13 | $46.00 | $23.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 48 | 10 | 20 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +3.9% | +2.5% | +3.0% | +3.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 9 | 56 | 13 | 5 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $2.45 | $2.04 | $1.43 | $0.77 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.4% | +1.5% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MPB vs PFIS vs KO vs NBTB vs FULT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +35. 8% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately -593% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 17. 2% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 22. 1% for MPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is MPB or PFIS or KO or NBTB or FULT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPB and PFIS and KO and NBTB and FULT and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.