Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MPB logo
MPB
PFIS logo
PFIS
NBTB logo
NBTB
FULT logo
FULT
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$868M
5Y Perf.+85.9%
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$636M
5Y Perf.+66.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPB logoMPB
PFIS logoPFIS
NBTB logoNBTB
FULT logoFULT
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$868M$636M$2.52B$4.50B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$281M$902M$1.89B$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$56M$59M$169M$392M$2.67B
Gross Margin63.6%66.7%73.6%67.4%37.6%
Operating Margin20.5%25.7%24.3%25.7%17.9%
Forward P/E10.8x9.8x11.5x11.5x6.2x
Total Debt$59M$258M$327M$1.30B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$58M$185M$271M$599M

MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPB
PFIS
NBTB
FULT
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB)100185.9+85.9%
Peoples Financial S… (PFIS)100166.3+66.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Peoples Financial Services Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. FULT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
MPB
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MPB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.2% vs NBTB's 3.1%
Best for: bank quality
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

PFIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.9%
  • Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
  • 118.8% 10Y total return vs MPB's 164.5%
  • 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +37.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: momentum
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
  • PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.64
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFIS logoPFIS22.3% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs MPB's 16.2%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.61 vs FULT's 0.99, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)FULT logoFULT+37.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 6.8%

MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MPBMid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
36.4%$5M
Debit Card
27.1%$4M
Mortgage Banking
19.4%$3M
Deposit Account
17.1%$2M
PFISPeoples Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing
67.6%$14M
Asset Management
14.7%$3M
Commission And Fees On Fiduciary Activities
11.3%$2M
Credit Card
6.4%$1M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFULTLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 41.4x PFIS's $281M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPB's 16.2%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$281M$902M$1.9B$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$79M$80M$241M$529M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$56M$59M$169M$392M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$31M$43M$225M$267M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.6%+66.7%+73.6%+67.4%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.5%+25.7%+24.3%+25.7%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.2%+21.0%+18.8%+20.7%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+15.4%+24.9%+14.1%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+95.1%+39.5%+47.2%+30.6%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$868M$636M$2.5B$4.5B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$881M$836M$2.7B$5.5B$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.44x10.80x14.47x11.23x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.81x9.83x11.54x11.49x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x2.06x0.80x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.57x11.03x10.43x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.66x2.26x2.90x2.38x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.23x1.29x1.23x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.28x14.66x11.49x15.81x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — MPB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFIS's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.4%+11.8%+9.5%+11.6%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+1.2%+1.1%+1.2%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+7.7%+7.9%+7.5%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.8%+2.4%+2.4%+9.5%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.50x0.17x0.37x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$200M$142M$1.0B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$58M$185M$271M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$258M$327M$1.3B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.57x0.77x1.05x0.84x21.16x
Evenly matched — MPB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFIS five years ago would be worth $16,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 25.1% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.6%+34.4%+17.6%+21.0%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.1%+34.3%+18.3%+37.8%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.2%+66.1%+48.5%+96.0%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.8%+67.6%+44.4%+61.1%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+164.5%+118.8%+108.5%+114.2%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.3%+18.4%+14.1%+25.1%-6.8%
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.68x0.76x0.99x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.22$63.91$48.27$23.48$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.02$43.64$39.20$16.60$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.3%+99.4%+99.8%+99.5%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.965.763.168.130.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded142K58K266K1.7M5.6M
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", PFIS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -11.8% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MPB's 2.29%.

MetricMPB logoMPBMid Penn Bancorp,…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$56.00$46.00$23.50$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts21102037
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+3.9%+3.0%+3.3%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises191351
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$2.45$1.43$0.77$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%+0.4%+1.5%+7.0%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FULT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallFulton Financial Corporation (FULT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) delivered a total return of +67. 6%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately 62% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 50% for Peoples Financial Services Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?

Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFIS leads at 25. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 3% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB).

09

Is MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 3. 9% yield, +118. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFIS: +118. 8%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPB and PFIS and NBTB and FULT and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.