Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $868M | $636M | $2.52B | $4.50B | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $281M | $902M | $1.89B | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $59M | $169M | $392M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 63.6% | 66.7% | 73.6% | 67.4% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.5% | 25.7% | 24.3% | 25.7% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 9.8x | 11.5x | 11.5x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $258M | $327M | $1.30B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $58M | $185M | $271M | $599M |
MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid Penn Bancorp, I… (MPB) | 100 | 185.9 | +85.9% |
| Peoples Financial S… (PFIS) | 100 | 166.3 | +66.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs NBTB's 3.1%
PFIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
- 118.8% 10Y total return vs MPB's 164.5%
- 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +37.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.64
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs MPB's 16.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs FULT's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.8% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs MPB's 0.9%, ROIC 6.0% vs 6.8% |
MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FULT leads 1 • MPB leads 0 • PFIS leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 41.4x PFIS's $281M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MPB's 16.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $281M | $902M | $1.9B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $80M | $241M | $529M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $59M | $169M | $392M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $43M | $225M | $267M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.6% | +66.7% | +73.6% | +67.4% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +25.7% | +24.3% | +25.7% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +21.0% | +18.8% | +20.7% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +15.4% | +24.9% | +14.1% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.3% | +95.1% | +39.5% | +47.2% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $868M | $636M | $2.5B | $4.5B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $881M | $836M | $2.7B | $5.5B | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.44x | 10.80x | 14.47x | 11.23x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.81x | 9.83x | 11.54x | 11.49x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 2.06x | 0.80x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.57x | 11.03x | 10.43x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 2.26x | 2.90x | 2.38x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.23x | 1.29x | 1.23x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.28x | 14.66x | 11.49x | 15.81x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MPB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for MPB. MPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFIS's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +11.8% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.7% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +2.4% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.50x | 0.17x | 0.37x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $200M | $142M | $1.0B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $58M | $185M | $271M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $258M | $327M | $1.3B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.57x | 0.77x | 1.05x | 0.84x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFIS five years ago would be worth $16,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +37.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 25.1% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +34.4% | +17.6% | +21.0% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.1% | +34.3% | +18.3% | +37.8% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.2% | +66.1% | +48.5% | +96.0% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +67.6% | +44.4% | +61.1% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.5% | +118.8% | +108.5% | +114.2% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +18.4% | +14.1% | +25.1% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.68x | 0.76x | 0.99x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.22 | $63.91 | $48.27 | $23.48 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.02 | $43.64 | $39.20 | $16.60 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +99.4% | +99.8% | +99.5% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 65.7 | 63.1 | 68.1 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 58K | 266K | 1.7M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MPB as "Buy", PFIS as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -11.8% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MPB's 2.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $56.00 | $46.00 | $23.50 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 10 | 20 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +3.9% | +3.0% | +3.3% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $2.45 | $1.43 | $0.77 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.5% | +7.0% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FULT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
MPB vs PFIS vs NBTB vs FULT vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) delivered a total return of +67. 6%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPB returned +164. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 99β — meaning FULT is approximately 62% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 50% for Peoples Financial Services Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFIS leads at 25. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 3% for Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (MPB).
09Is MPB or PFIS or NBTB or FULT or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Peoples Financial Services Corp.
(PFIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 3. 9% yield, +118. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFIS: +118. 8%, FULT: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPB and PFIS and NBTB and FULT and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MPB (Financial Services) and PFIS (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.