Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MPC vs PBF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$72.38B
5Y Perf.+599.4%
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.88B
5Y Perf.+291.6%

MPC vs PBF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MPC logoMPC
PBF logoPBF
IndustryOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$72.38B$4.88B
Revenue (TTM)$135.75B$29.33B
Net Income (TTM)$4.63B$-159M
Gross Margin8.8%-1.9%
Operating Margin5.0%-0.2%
Forward P/E11.1x7.5x
Total Debt$34.36B$2.90B
Cash & Equiv.$3.67B$528M

MPC vs PBFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MPC
PBF
StockMay 20May 26Return
Marathon Petroleum … (MPC)100699.4+599.4%
PBF Energy Inc. (PBF)100391.6+291.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MPC vs PBF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PBF leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Marathon Petroleum Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
The Growth Play

MPC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 31.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.2%
  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs PBF's 68.4%
  • -4.4% revenue growth vs PBF's -11.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
The Income Pick

PBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 53.2%, current ratio 1.21x
  • Beta 0.13, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.21x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMPC logoMPC-4.4% revenue growth vs PBF's -11.4%
ValuePBF logoPBFLower P/E (7.5x vs 11.1x)
Quality / MarginsMPC logoMPC3.4% margin vs PBF's -0.5%
Stability / SafetyPBF logoPBFBeta 0.13 vs MPC's 0.30, lower leverage
DividendsPBF logoPBF2.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MPC's 1.5%
Momentum (1Y)PBF logoPBF+127.8% vs MPC's +72.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MPC logoMPC5.5% ROA vs PBF's -1.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs -0.5%

MPC vs PBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MPCMarathon Petroleum Corporation
FY 2025
Refining And Marketing
93.6%$124.3B
Midstream
4.2%$5.6B
Renewable Diesel
2.1%$2.8B
PBFPBF Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Prior to elimination
50.0%$29.7B
Refining Group
49.4%$29.3B
Logistics Group
0.6%$384M

MPC vs PBF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPCLAGGINGPBF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MPC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

MPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $135.8B annually — 4.6x PBF's $29.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.4% (MPC) to -0.5% (PBF). On growth, MPC holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMPC logoMPCMarathon Petroleu…PBF logoPBFPBF Energy Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$135.8B$29.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10.1B$600M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4.6B-$159M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.7B-$783M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+8.8%-1.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.0%-0.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.4%-0.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.2%-2.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%-2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.2%+126.2%
MPC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, MPC's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PBF's 11.9x.

MetricMPC logoMPCMarathon Petroleu…PBF logoPBFPBF Energy Inc.
Market CapShares × price$72.4B$4.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$103.1B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.52x-29.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.07x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.43x11.93x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.55x0.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.11x0.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.18x
PBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MPC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MPC delivers a 19.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PBF. PBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPC's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPC scores 7/9 vs PBF's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMPC logoMPCMarathon Petroleu…PBF logoPBFPBF Energy Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.6%-3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.5%-1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.3%-0.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.3%-0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.43x0.53x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$30.7B$2.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3.7B$528M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$34.4B$2.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.36x-3.01x
MPC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MPC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MPC five years ago would be worth $43,929 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27,958 for PBF. Over the past 12 months, PBF leads with a +127.8% total return vs MPC's +72.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPC at 33.1% vs PBF's 10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMPC logoMPCMarathon Petroleu…PBF logoPBFPBF Energy Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+49.4%+46.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+72.7%+127.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+135.7%+36.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+339.3%+179.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+654.2%+68.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.1%+10.9%
MPC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MPC and PBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPC's 0.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs PBF's 79.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMPC logoMPCMarathon Petroleu…PBF logoPBFPBF Energy Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.30x0.13x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$261.61$52.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$141.91$17.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.9%+79.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.061.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M3.7M
Evenly matched — MPC and PBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MPC and PBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates MPC as "Buy" and PBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -8.6% upside for PBF (target: $38) vs -12.6% for MPC (target: $215). For income investors, PBF offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs MPC's 1.52%.

MetricMPC logoMPCMarathon Petroleu…PBF logoPBFPBF Energy Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$214.78$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3326
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises43
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.74$1.10
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.8%0.0%
Evenly matched — MPC and PBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MPC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PBF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMarathon Petroleum Corporat… (MPC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MPC vs PBF: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MPC or PBF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is the stronger pick with -4.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MPC or PBF?

On forward P/E, PBF Energy Inc.

is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MPC or PBF?

Over the past 5 years, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) delivered a total return of +339.

3%, compared to +179. 6% for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPC returned +654. 2% versus PBF's +68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MPC or PBF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PBF Energy Inc.

(PBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Marathon Petroleum Corporation's 0. 30β — meaning MPC is approximately 136% more volatile than PBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 143% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MPC or PBF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is pulling ahead at -4.

4% versus -11. 4% for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PBF Energy Inc. grew EPS 69. 8% year-over-year, compared to 31. 5% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPC leads at -9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MPC or PBF?

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is the more profitable company, earning 3.

0% net margin versus -0. 5% for PBF Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPC leads at 4. 3% versus -0. 2% for PBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPC leads at 7. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MPC or PBF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, PBF Energy Inc.

(PBF) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 1x for Marathon Petroleum Corporation — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PBF: -8. 6% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MPC or PBF?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 5% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC).

09

Is MPC or PBF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

30), 1. 5% yield, +654. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPC: +654. 2%, PBF: +68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MPC and PBF?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MPC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PBF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MPC and PBF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MPC: 9.7% · PBF: -2.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.