Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $237M | $423M | $2.52B | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $205M | $129M | $902M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $20M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 73.0% | 73.6% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 19.2% | 24.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 22.2x | 11.5x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $178M | $0.00 | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $119M | $185M | $119M |
MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Corporation (MRBK) | 100 | 251.7 | +151.7% |
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 184.4 | +84.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 30.3%
- 158.0% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.5x)
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.76 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Beta 0.48 vs NBTB's 0.76
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MRBK's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs NBTB's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MRBK's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
MRBK leads 2 • PBFS leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 10.0x CZWI's $90M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRBK's 10.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $205M | $129M | $902M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $25M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $20M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $21M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.4% | +73.0% | +73.6% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +19.2% | +24.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +15.3% | +18.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +16.2% | +24.9% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | -4.3% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MRBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, MRBK trades at a 52% valuation discount to PBFS's 22.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.76x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $237M | $423M | $2.5B | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $405M | $304M | $2.7B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.56x | 22.20x | 14.47x | 14.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.74x | — | 11.54x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x | 2.06x | 2.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.19x | 9.24x | 11.03x | 15.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 4.80x | 2.90x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.35x | 1.29x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.51x | 13.14x | 11.49x | 19.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PBFS and NBTB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRBK delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $6 for PBFS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRBK's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRBK scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +6.2% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +8.1% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.7% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | — | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $168M | -$119M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $119M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $178M | $0 | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.36x | 0.79x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRBK five years ago would be worth $17,068 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,000 for PBFS. Over the past 12 months, MRBK leads with a +57.5% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs NBTB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +26.7% | +17.6% | +24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.5% | +47.2% | +18.3% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +90.4% | +48.5% | +153.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.7% | +40.0% | +44.4% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.0% | +14.4% | +108.5% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.1% | +23.9% | +14.1% | +36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBFS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs MRBK's 92.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.48x | 0.76x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.67 | $17.04 | $48.27 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.16 | $11.40 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +99.0% | +99.8% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 70.2 | 63.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 16K | 266K | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRBK as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.2% upside for MRBK (target: $21) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | — | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | — | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — | +3.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 13 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | — | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.5% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MRBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MRBK vs PBFS vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Meridian Corporation (MRBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Meridian Corporation (MRBK) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Meridian Corporation (MRBK) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Meridian Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Meridian Corporation (MRBK) delivered a total return of +70.
7%, compared to +40. 0% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRBK returned +158. 0% versus PBFS's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 60% more volatile than PBFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 89% for Meridian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Meridian Corporation grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 10. 6% for Meridian Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Meridian Corporation (MRBK) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRBK: 5. 2% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
0% yield), MRBK (2. 5% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MRBK or PBFS or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, PBFS: +14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRBK and PBFS and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. MRBK, NBTB, CZWI pay a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.