Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $146M | $31M | $12.86B | $6.24B | $53.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $143M | $3.13B | $4.02B | $46.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-76M | $252M | $-104M | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 47.5% | 37.1% | 63.9% | 58.1% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -101.9% | -51.0% | 13.4% | 21.5% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 27.4x | 9.1x | 30.1x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $40M | $582M | $1.61B | $11.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $27M | $1.02B | $130M | $7.46B |
MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marti Technologies,… (MRT) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| On Holding AG (ONON) | 100 | 96.1 | -3.9% |
| Crocs, Inc. (CROX) | 100 | 76.0 | -24.0% |
| NIKE, Inc. (NKE) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 110.3%, EPS growth 57.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
- Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
Among these 5 stocks, BIRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ONON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 8.1% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
- 9.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 26.9% vs -147.7%
CROX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 10.9% 10Y total return vs ONON's 10.2%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 30.1x)
- +20.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
NKE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 3.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 83.4%, current ratio 2.21x
- Beta 0.96, yield 3.4%, current ratio 2.21x
- 3.4% yield; 24-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 30.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs MRT's -151.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 24-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs BIRD's -69.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 26.9% vs -147.7% |
MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONON leads in 2 of 6 categories
CROX leads 2 • NKE leads 1 • MRT leads 0 • BIRD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $46.5B annually — 1333.5x MRT's $35M. ONON is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $143M | $3.1B | $4.0B | $46.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$65M | $555M | $946M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$76M | $252M | -$104M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$42M | $307M | $671M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.5% | +37.1% | +63.9% | +58.1% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -101.9% | -51.0% | +13.4% | +21.5% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -151.1% | -53.4% | +8.1% | -2.6% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -53.0% | -29.3% | +9.8% | +16.7% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.4% | -30.5% | +17.0% | -1.7% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | +12.5% | +82.4% | -4.2% | -30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, NKE trades at a 61% valuation discount to ONON's 53.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONON's 20.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $31M | $12.9B | $6.2B | $53.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $43M | $12.3B | $7.7B | $57.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.21x | -0.39x | 53.00x | -83.14x | 20.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 27.43x | 9.13x | 30.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 3.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 20.35x | 7.99x | 12.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.73x | 0.20x | 3.56x | 1.54x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.83x | 6.28x | 5.23x | 5.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 40.47x | 9.47x | 16.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ONON leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NKE delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-174 for BIRD. ONON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONON scores 7/9 vs BIRD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -173.5% | +15.9% | -7.5% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -67.5% | +9.1% | -2.4% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -147.7% | -82.0% | +26.9% | +21.7% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -138.0% | -70.5% | +18.8% | +23.5% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.10x | 0.36x | 1.25x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | $13M | -$439M | $1.5B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $27M | $1.0B | $130M | $7.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $40M | $582M | $1.6B | $11.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.71x | -32.09x | 9.16x | 10.07x | 10.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CROX five years ago would be worth $11,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $63 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +20.3% total return vs BIRD's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ONON at 8.1% vs BIRD's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | -11.2% | -17.8% | +43.4% | -27.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.5% | -69.0% | -30.8% | +20.3% | -25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.9% | -85.6% | +26.2% | +7.9% | -53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -99.4% | +10.2% | +10.8% | -60.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | -99.4% | +10.2% | +1086.6% | +2.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.5% | -47.6% | +8.1% | +2.6% | -22.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRT and CROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.81x | 1.53x | 1.09x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.15 | $24.31 | $56.82 | $129.45 | $80.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.55 | $2.15 | $31.41 | $73.21 | $41.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.0% | +15.1% | +67.9% | +96.3% | +56.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 42.2 | 57.6 | 67.6 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 7.4M | 5.8M | 1.2M | 19.8M |
Analyst Outlook
NKE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", ONON as "Buy", CROX as "Buy", NKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs -6.9% for CROX (target: $116). NKE is the only dividend payer here at 3.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.20 | — | $54.36 | $116.11 | $64.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 26 | 37 | 71 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 | 24 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +9.4% | +5.6% |
ONON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CROX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). NIKE, Inc. (NKE) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (30. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate On Holding AG (ONON) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?
On trailing P/E, NIKE, Inc.
(NKE) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus On Holding AG at 53. 0x. On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?
Over the past 5 years, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) delivered a total return of +10. 8%, compared to -99. 4% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1087% versus BIRD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning BIRD is approximately 193% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, On Holding AG (ONON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.
(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marti Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 57. 6% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONON leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?
NIKE, Inc.
(NKE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 0% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CROX leads at 22. 0% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONON leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 1x for NIKE, Inc. — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?
In this comparison, NKE (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MRT, BIRD, ONON, CROX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +1087% 10Y return). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1087%, BIRD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRT and BIRD and ONON and CROX and NKE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and BIRD (Technology) and ONON (Consumer Cyclical) and CROX (Consumer Cyclical) and NKE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NKE pays a dividend while MRT, BIRD, ONON, CROX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.