Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MRT logo
MRT
BIRD logo
BIRD
ONON logo
ONON
CROX logo
CROX
NKE logo
NKE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • TR
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-82.4%
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
ONON
On Holding AG

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CH
Market Cap$12.86B
5Y Perf.-3.9%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.24B
5Y Perf.-24.0%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$53.51B
5Y Perf.-73.5%

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRT logoMRT
BIRD logoBIRD
ONON logoONON
CROX logoCROX
NKE logoNKE
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureApparel - RetailApparel - Footwear & AccessoriesApparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$146M$31M$12.86B$6.24B$53.51B
Revenue (TTM)$35M$143M$3.13B$4.02B$46.51B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$-76M$252M$-104M$2.52B
Gross Margin47.5%37.1%63.9%58.1%41.1%
Operating Margin-101.9%-51.0%13.4%21.5%6.5%
Forward P/E27.4x9.1x30.1x
Total Debt$87M$40M$582M$1.61B$11.02B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$27M$1.02B$130M$7.46B

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRT
BIRD
ONON
CROX
NKE
StockNov 21Jun 26Return
Marti Technologies,… (MRT)10017.6-82.4%
Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD)1001.0-99.0%
On Holding AG (ONON)10096.1-3.9%
Crocs, Inc. (CROX)10076.0-24.0%
NIKE, Inc. (NKE)10026.5-73.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MRT and ONON are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. On Holding AG is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CROX and NKE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

MRT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 110.3%, EPS growth 57.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
  • Beta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
Best for: growth exposure
BIRD
Allbirds, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BIRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
ONON
On Holding AG
The Quality Compounder

ONON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 8.1% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
  • 9.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 26.9% vs -147.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CROX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs ONON's 10.2%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 30.1x)
  • +20.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
The Income Pick

NKE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 3.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 83.4%, current ratio 2.21x
  • Beta 0.96, yield 3.4%, current ratio 2.21x
  • 3.4% yield; 24-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRT logoMRT110.3% revenue growth vs BIRD's -19.7%
ValueCROX logoCROXLower P/E (9.1x vs 30.1x)
Quality / MarginsONON logoONON8.1% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
Stability / SafetyMRT logoMRTBeta 0.62 vs BIRD's 1.81
DividendsNKE logoNKE3.4% yield; 24-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CROX logoCROX+20.3% vs BIRD's -69.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ONON logoONON9.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 26.9% vs -147.7%

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MRTMarti Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Member
50.3%$298,798
Fuel
32.5%$192,849
Electricity
17.2%$102,030
BIRDAllbirds, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$152M
ONONOn Holding AG
FY 2025
Shoes
93.0%$2.8B
Apparel
5.6%$170M
Accessories
1.3%$40M
CROXCrocs, Inc.
FY 2025
Crocs Brand Segment
82.3%$3.3B
HEYDUDE Brand Segment
17.7%$715M
NKENIKE, Inc.
FY 2025
Footwear
66.9%$31.0B
Apparel
33.0%$15.3B
Product and Service, Other
0.2%$74M

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLONONLAGGINGBIRD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ONON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $46.5B annually — 1333.5x MRT's $35M. ONON is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$143M$3.1B$4.0B$46.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$65M$555M$946M$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M-$76M$252M-$104M$2.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M-$42M$307M$671M$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.5%+37.1%+63.9%+58.1%+41.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-101.9%-51.0%+13.4%+21.5%+6.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-151.1%-53.4%+8.1%-2.6%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-53.0%-29.3%+9.8%+16.7%+5.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+115.4%-30.5%+17.0%-1.7%+0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.6%+12.5%+82.4%-4.2%-30.8%
ONON leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.8x trailing earnings, NKE trades at a 61% valuation discount to ONON's 53.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONON's 20.4x.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$146M$31M$12.9B$6.2B$53.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$225M$43M$12.3B$7.7B$57.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.21x-0.39x53.00x-83.14x20.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.43x9.13x30.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.35x7.99x12.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x0.20x3.56x1.54x1.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.83x6.28x5.23x5.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.47x9.47x16.37x
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ONON leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NKE delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-174 for BIRD. ONON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONON scores 7/9 vs BIRD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-173.5%+15.9%-7.5%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%-67.5%+9.1%-2.4%+6.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-147.7%-82.0%+26.9%+21.7%+16.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-138.0%-70.5%+18.8%+23.5%+13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.10x0.36x1.25x0.83x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$79M$13M-$439M$1.5B$3.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$27M$1.0B$130M$7.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$87M$40M$582M$1.6B$11.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.71x-32.09x9.16x10.07x10.45x
ONON leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CROX five years ago would be worth $11,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $63 for BIRD. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +20.3% total return vs BIRD's -69.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ONON at 8.1% vs BIRD's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.7%-11.2%-17.8%+43.4%-27.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.5%-69.0%-30.8%+20.3%-25.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%-85.6%+26.2%+7.9%-53.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.5%-99.4%+10.2%+10.8%-60.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%-99.4%+10.2%+1086.6%+2.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.5%-47.6%+8.1%+2.6%-22.6%
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MRT and CROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRD's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs BIRD's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.62x1.81x1.53x1.09x0.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.15$24.31$56.82$129.45$80.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.55$2.15$31.41$73.21$41.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+15.1%+67.9%+96.3%+56.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.142.257.667.656.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K7.4M5.8M1.2M19.8M
Evenly matched — MRT and CROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NKE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", ONON as "Buy", CROX as "Buy", NKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs -6.9% for CROX (target: $116). NKE is the only dividend payer here at 3.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…BIRD logoBIRDAllbirds, Inc.ONON logoONONOn Holding AGCROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.20$54.36$116.11$64.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts1263771
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0024
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%0.0%+9.4%+5.6%
NKE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ONON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CROX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallOn Holding AG (ONON)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRT vs BIRD vs ONON vs CROX vs NKE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). NIKE, Inc. (NKE) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (30. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate On Holding AG (ONON) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?

On trailing P/E, NIKE, Inc.

(NKE) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus On Holding AG at 53. 0x. On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?

Over the past 5 years, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) delivered a total return of +10. 8%, compared to -99. 4% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1087% versus BIRD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Allbirds, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning BIRD is approximately 193% more volatile than MRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, On Holding AG (ONON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus -19. 7% for Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marti Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 57. 6% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ONON leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?

NIKE, Inc.

(NKE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 0% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CROX leads at 22. 0% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONON leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 1x for NIKE, Inc. — 21. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE?

In this comparison, NKE (3.

4% yield) pays a dividend. MRT, BIRD, ONON, CROX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MRT or BIRD or ONON or CROX or NKE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), +1087% 10Y return). Allbirds, Inc. (BIRD) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1087%, BIRD: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRT and BIRD and ONON and CROX and NKE?

These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and BIRD (Technology) and ONON (Consumer Cyclical) and CROX (Consumer Cyclical) and NKE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONON is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NKE pays a dividend while MRT, BIRD, ONON, CROX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.