Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRUS
Merus N.V.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • NL
Market Cap$6.83B
5Y Perf.+559.3%
ZYME
Zymeworks Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$2.05B
5Y Perf.-30.9%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.83B
5Y Perf.-0.9%
AGEN
Agenus Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.-95.8%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$264M
5Y Perf.-97.0%

MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRUS logoMRUS
ZYME logoZYME
IMVT logoIMVT
AGEN logoAGEN
FATE logoFATE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$6.83B$2.05B$5.83B$137M$264M
Revenue (TTM)$51M$106M$0.00$114M$7M
Net Income (TTM)$-335M$-81M$-464M$115K$-136M
Gross Margin-217.5%98.4%35.7%
Operating Margin-6.5%-87.3%-17.7%-22.2%
Forward P/E23.3x1.9x
Total Debt$10M$18M$98K$10M$78M
Cash & Equiv.$293M$41M$714M$3M$47M

MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRUS
ZYME
IMVT
AGEN
FATE
StockMay 20Jan 26Return
Merus N.V. (MRUS)100659.3+559.3%
Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME)10069.1-30.9%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10099.1-0.9%
Agenus Inc. (AGEN)1004.2-95.8%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1003.0-97.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AGEN leads in 2 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Merus N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. ZYME, IMVT, and FATE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MRUS
Merus N.V.
The Income Pick

MRUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 0.32
  • 8.0% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 188.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 6.54x
  • Beta 0.32, current ratio 6.54x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ZYME
Zymeworks Inc.
The Growth Leader

ZYME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 38.9% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
Best for: growth
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 3.2% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Best for: quality
AGEN
Agenus Inc.
The Growth Play

AGEN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 0.1% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
Best for: growth exposure
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +139.1% vs AGEN's +31.0%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthZYME logoZYME38.9% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
ValueAGEN logoAGENBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsIMVT logoIMVT3.2% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Stability / SafetyMRUS logoMRUSBeta 0.32 vs AGEN's 2.72
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FATE logoFATE+139.1% vs AGEN's +31.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AGEN logoAGEN0.1% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%

MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MRUSMerus N.V.
FY 2024
Collaboration Revenue
100.0%$36M
ZYMEZymeworks Inc.
FY 2025
Milestone Revenue
61.6%$25M
Option Exercise Fee
18.5%$8M
Research Support Payments And Other Service
13.8%$6M
Royalty
6.1%$2M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AGENAgenus Inc.
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue
99.1%$109M
Other
0.9%$1M
FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M

MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAGENLAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AGEN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $114M and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRUS logoMRUSMerus N.V.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$51M$106M$0$114M$7M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$329M-$96M-$487M-$10M-$148M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$335M-$81M-$464M$115,000-$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$318M-$35M-$423M-$159M-$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-2.2%+98.4%+35.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.5%-87.3%-17.7%-22.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.5%-76.6%+0.1%-20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.2%-33.0%-139.1%-13.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.9%-91.9%+27.5%-26.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.7%-77.4%+19.7%+85.3%+38.6%
AGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricMRUS logoMRUSMerus N.V.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$6.8B$2.1B$5.8B$137M$264M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.5B$2.0B$5.1B$145M$295M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-26.87x-25.56x-10.50x-1144.12x-1.99x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.28x1.85x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue195.71x19.36x1.20x39.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.92x7.75x6.14x1.31x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ZYME and IMVT each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.

ZYME delivers a -26.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-26 in annual profit, vs $-66 for FATE. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATE's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMRUS logoMRUSMerus N.V.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-50.6%-26.0%-47.1%-65.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-43.4%-20.6%-44.1%+0.1%-42.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-74.6%-25.9%-36.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-48.4%-27.3%-66.1%-43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945262
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.07x0.00x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$283M-$23M-$714M$7M$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$293M$41M$714M$3M$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$18M$98,000$10M$78M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.11x
Evenly matched — ZYME and IMVT each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MRUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MRUS five years ago would be worth $44,357 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +139.1% total return vs AGEN's +31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRUS at 65.1% vs AGEN's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRUS logoMRUSMerus N.V.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date0.0%+3.7%+10.7%+20.4%+131.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+128.1%+135.2%+107.2%+31.0%+139.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+350.2%+215.2%+48.4%-87.8%-58.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+343.6%-6.4%+73.9%-93.1%-97.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+796.4%+112.4%+188.1%-93.5%+33.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+65.1%+46.6%+14.1%-50.4%-25.1%
MRUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MRUS and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MRUS is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRUS logoMRUSMerus N.V.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x0.97x1.37x2.72x2.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$97.14$29.75$30.09$7.34$2.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$37.92$10.86$13.36$2.71$0.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.6%+92.8%+95.3%+53.0%+95.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10014.949.355.754.785.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded0615K1.4M800K1.8M
Evenly matched — MRUS and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: MRUS as "Hold", ZYME as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1624.9% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs -1.5% for MRUS (target: $89).

MetricMRUS logoMRUSMerus N.V.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$88.69$38.33$45.50$7.33$39.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2220231131
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MRUS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallAgenus Inc. (AGEN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRUS vs ZYME vs IMVT vs AGEN vs FATE: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Zymeworks Inc.

(ZYME) is the stronger pick with 38. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Analysts rate Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE?

Over the past 5 years, Merus N.

V. (MRUS) delivered a total return of +343. 6%, compared to -97. 0% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRUS returned +796. 4% versus AGEN's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merus N.

V. (MRUS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 747% more volatile than MRUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 38% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zymeworks Inc.

(ZYME) is pulling ahead at 38. 9% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGEN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE?

Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 3x for Zymeworks Inc. — 21. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1624. 9% to $39. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is MRUS or ZYME or IMVT or AGEN or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Merus N.

V. (MRUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +796. 4% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRUS: +796. 4%, AGEN: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MRUS and ZYME and IMVT and AGEN and FATE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MRUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZYME is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MRUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZYME

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGEN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FATE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MRUS and ZYME and IMVT and AGEN and FATE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MRUS: -1.9% · ZYME: -91.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.