Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Financial - Capital Markets
MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3.73B | $4.23B | $68.72B | $37.30B | $5.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $3.63B | $4.47B | $10.23B | $849M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $526M | $551M | $1.90B | $984M | $310M |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 48.0% | 83.3% | 89.8% | 69.9% |
| Operating Margin | 32.0% | 33.8% | 46.8% | 86.0% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 8.3x | 40.5x | 33.6x | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $10.17B | $8.98B | $15.41B | $19M | $285M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6.38B | $1.06B | $4.26B | $4.96B | $520M |
MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marex Group plc Ord… (MRX) | 100 | 269.4 | +169.4% |
| Virtu Financial, In… (VIRT) | 100 | 228.3 | +128.3% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 462.6 | +362.6% |
| Interactive Brokers… (IBKR) | 100 | 290.9 | +190.9% |
| MarketAxess Holding… (MKTX) | 100 | 76.3 | -23.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VIRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 72.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 1.69x
- Beta 0.40, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.69x
HOOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.16 vs MKTX's 3.03
- NIM 4.0% vs MRX's 0.4%
- 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8%
IBKR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.2% 10Y total return vs MRX's 178.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs MRX's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- +86.9% vs MKTX's -31.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs MRX's 0.4%
Among these 5 stocks, MKTX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs MKTX's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 18.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs MRX's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs HOOD's 3.05 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs MKTX's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.9% vs MKTX's -31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.0% vs MRX's 0.4% |
MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBKR leads in 4 of 6 categories
MRX leads 0 • VIRT leads 0 • HOOD leads 0 • MKTX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBKR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 12.0x MKTX's $849M. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRX's 8.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $3.6B | $4.5B | $10.2B | $849M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $1.9B | $2.2B | $8.9B | $443M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $526M | $551M | $1.9B | $984M | $310M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $883M | $1.1B | $2.2B | $15.7B | $236M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +48.0% | +83.3% | +89.8% | +69.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +33.8% | +46.8% | +86.0% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +12.9% | +42.1% | +9.6% | +29.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +35.7% | +36.3% | +153.9% | +44.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.8% | +96.3% | +2.7% | +26.0% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IBKR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, VIRT trades at a 74% valuation discount to IBKR's 37.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOOD offers better value at 0.14x vs MKTX's 3.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $4.2B | $68.7B | $37.3B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $12.1B | $79.9B | $32.4B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.41x | 9.66x | 37.21x | 37.71x | 22.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.60x | 8.26x | 40.47x | 33.59x | 18.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.34x | — | 0.14x | 1.27x | 3.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.28x | 9.07x | 36.63x | 3.64x | 11.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | 1.16x | 15.36x | 3.65x | 6.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.13x | 2.14x | 7.66x | 1.83x | 4.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.70x | 3.26x | 42.34x | 2.37x | 14.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBKR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRX delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $5 for IBKR. IBKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRX's 8.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRX scores 6/9 vs HOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +49.7% | +29.4% | +21.4% | +5.2% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +2.6% | +4.7% | +0.5% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +10.1% | +7.9% | +24.7% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +7.7% | +24.0% | +22.2% | +25.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.05x | 4.55x | 1.68x | 0.00x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $7.9B | $11.1B | -$4.9B | -$235M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6.4B | $1.1B | $4.3B | $5.0B | $520M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.2B | $9.0B | $15.4B | $19M | $285M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | 3.71x | 97.05x | 2.13x | 168.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBKR five years ago would be worth $48,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,822 for MKTX. Over the past 12 months, IBKR leads with a +86.9% total return vs MKTX's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 104.6% vs MKTX's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.1% | +52.7% | -33.8% | +24.6% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.4% | +21.4% | +52.6% | +86.9% | -31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.6% | +198.6% | +756.1% | +332.1% | -46.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.6% | +93.2% | +119.1% | +386.1% | -61.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.6% | +212.0% | +119.1% | +823.8% | +38.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | +44.0% | +104.6% | +62.9% | -18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBKR and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTX is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBKR currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs HOOD's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.40x | 3.05x | 1.93x | -0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.60 | $52.21 | $153.86 | $87.37 | $232.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.91 | $31.55 | $48.32 | $44.45 | $146.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +94.9% | +49.6% | +95.8% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 58.9 | 51.0 | 74.6 | 26.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.1M | 29.4M | 4.5M | 456K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VIRT and MKTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MRX as "Buy", VIRT as "Hold", HOOD as "Buy", IBKR as "Buy", MKTX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for HOOD (target: $117) vs -3.1% for VIRT (target: $48). For income investors, VIRT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.07% vs IBKR's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.00 | $48.00 | $117.14 | $87.67 | $195.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 | 25 | 19 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +2.1% | — | +0.4% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | $1.03 | — | $0.30 | $3.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +4.4% | +1.0% | +0.2% | +7.7% |
IBKR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
MRX vs VIRT vs HOOD vs IBKR vs MKTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares (MRX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX?
On trailing P/E, Virtu Financial, Inc.
(VIRT) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Virtu Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX?
Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
(IBKR) delivered a total return of +386. 1%, compared to -61. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBKR returned +823. 8% versus MKTX's +38. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately -1186% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Virtu Financial, Inc. grew EPS 72. 7% year-over-year, compared to -8. 5% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX?
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 8. 5% for Marex Group plc Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus 32. 0% for MRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus MarketAxess Holdings Inc. 's 3. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 40. 5x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 32. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 53. 6% to $117. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX?
In this comparison, VIRT (2.
1% yield), MKTX (2. 0% yield), MRX (1. 4% yield), IBKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HOOD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MRX or VIRT or HOOD or IBKR or MKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
(MKTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTX: +38. 3%, HOOD: +119. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MRX and VIRT and HOOD and IBKR and MKTX?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; VIRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MRX, VIRT, MKTX pay a dividend while HOOD, IBKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.