Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $608M | $699M | $898M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $468M | $315M | $372M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-124M | $69M | $89M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 69.6% | 64.0% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22.1% | 25.8% | 27.5% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 9.6x | 9.5x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $432M | $117M | $826M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $52M | $473M | $119M |
MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midland States Banc… (MSBI) | 100 | 189.3 | +89.3% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.7 | +126.7% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 4.5%
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 9.6x)
- 4.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%
IBCP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- PEG 0.63 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 2.7% NII/revenue growth vs MSBI's -14.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs MSBI's 1.05, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.7% NII/revenue growth vs MSBI's -14.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MSBI's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs MSBI's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.4% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MSBI's 0.8% |
MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSBI leads in 2 of 6 categories
MBWM leads 1 • IBCP leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBWM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $468M annually — 5.2x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSBI's -26.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $468M | $315M | $372M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$106M | $89M | $107M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$124M | $69M | $89M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $70M | $11M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.4% | +69.6% | +64.0% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.1% | +25.8% | +27.5% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | +21.7% | +23.9% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +22.2% | +3.0% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.0% | +2.3% | +14.8% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MSBI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 34% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $608M | $699M | $898M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $913M | $764M | $1.3B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.62x | 10.38x | 9.53x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.08x | 9.56x | 9.54x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.97x | 0.63x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.39x | 11.75x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 2.22x | 2.42x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 1.41x | 1.17x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.06x | 9.96x | 80.15x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-22 for MSBI. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.7% | +14.2% | +13.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +1.3% | +1.4% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | +10.2% | +5.5% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +2.6% | +8.0% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.23x | 1.14x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $304M | $65M | $353M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $52M | $473M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $432M | $117M | $826M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.76x | 0.91x | 0.79x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MSBI and CZWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $17,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,964 for MSBI. Over the past 12 months, MSBI leads with a +66.4% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs MSBI's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.1% | +7.2% | +10.1% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.4% | +12.6% | +23.6% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.7% | +130.6% | +127.3% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.6% | +63.7% | +78.4% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.8% | +184.6% | +178.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +32.1% | +31.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSBI and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSBI's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSBI currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.83x | 0.87x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.46 | $37.39 | $55.77 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.24 | $29.63 | $42.17 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +90.8% | +93.3% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.4 | 50.6 | 53.1 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 139K | 176K | 112K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
MSBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSBI as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", MBWM as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs -6.5% for MSBI (target: $27). For income investors, MSBI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.47% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $38.00 | $57.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 7 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +3.0% | +2.8% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 | 6 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $1.03 | $1.47 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
MSBI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MBWM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MSBI vs IBCP vs MBWM vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the stronger pick with 2.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 4% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Midland States Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +78.
4%, compared to +19. 6% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus MSBI's +76. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Midland States Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning MSBI is approximately 128% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is pulling ahead at 2.
7% versus -14. 4% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -565. 2% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus -26. 6% for Midland States Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus -22. 1% for MSBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is MSBI or IBCP or MBWM or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MSBI: +76. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSBI and IBCP and MBWM and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MSBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.