Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.00B
5Y Perf.+94.9%
FWONK
Formula One Group

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.83B
5Y Perf.+174.4%
TKO
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$36.50B
5Y Perf.+305.3%
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.15B
5Y Perf.-15.8%
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$38.65B
5Y Perf.+238.3%

MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MSGS logoMSGS
FWONK logoFWONK
TKO logoTKO
MSGE logoMSGE
LYV logoLYV
IndustryEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$8.00B$20.83B$36.50B$3.15B$38.65B
Revenue (TTM)$1.07B$1.02B$5.06B$1.16B$25.61B
Net Income (TTM)$-17M$449M$385M$42M$84M
Gross Margin25.9%-18.4%34.5%31.5%40.3%
Operating Margin0.4%-3.4%20.0%10.1%3.4%
Forward P/E57.5x38.1x56.8x115.8x
Total Debt$1.18B$0.00$4.06B$1.20B$12.44B
Cash & Equiv.$153M$1.05B$831M$43M$7.11B

MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MSGS
FWONK
TKO
MSGE
LYV
StockMay 20May 26Return
Madison Square Gard… (MSGS)100194.9+94.9%
Formula One Group (FWONK)100274.4+174.4%
TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO)100405.3+305.3%
Madison Square Gard… (MSGE)10084.2-15.8%
Live Nation Enterta… (LYV)100338.3+238.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FWONK and TKO are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MSGE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

MSGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
FWONK
Formula One Group
The Quality Compounder

FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • 43.8% margin vs MSGS's -1.5%
  • Beta 0.35 vs MSGE's 0.94
  • 42.6% ROA vs MSGS's -1.1%
Best for: quality and stability
TKO
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

TKO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs LYV's 6.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 1.26x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
The Momentum Pick

MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +83.6% vs FWONK's -0.1%
Best for: momentum
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LYV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTKO logoTKO68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
ValueTKO logoTKOLower P/E (38.1x vs 115.8x)
Quality / MarginsFWONK logoFWONK43.8% margin vs MSGS's -1.5%
Stability / SafetyFWONK logoFWONKBeta 0.35 vs MSGE's 0.94
DividendsTKO logoTKO1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MSGE logoMSGE+83.6% vs FWONK's -0.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FWONK logoFWONK42.6% ROA vs MSGS's -1.1%

MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp.
FY 2025
Event-related
44.5%$463M
Local Media Rights
27.5%$286M
Sponsorship, signage and suite licenses
22.1%$230M
League Distribution
5.9%$61M
FWONKFormula One Group
FY 2024
Formula 1
90.8%$3.3B
Other
9.2%$335M
TKOTKO Group Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
FY 2025
Entertainment
45.2%$712M
Ticketing And Venue License Fee Revenues
28.8%$453M
Sponsorship and Signage, Suite And Advertising Commission Revenues
16.0%$253M
Food, Beverage And Merchandise Revenues
9.6%$151M
Product and Service, Other
0.4%$6M
LYVLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Concerts
63.3%$3.3B
Sponsorship and Advertising
32.7%$1.7B
Ticketing
4.0%$205M

MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTKOLAGGINGMSGE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TKO leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.6B annually — 25.0x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSGS's -1.5%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…FWONK logoFWONKFormula One GroupTKO logoTKOTKO Group Holding…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$1.0B$5.1B$1.2B$25.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$8M$231M$1.5B$245M$1.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$17M$449M$385M$42M$84M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$279M$1.8B$289M$1.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.9%-18.4%+34.5%+31.5%+40.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%-3.4%+20.0%+10.1%+3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.5%+43.8%+7.6%+3.6%+0.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.3%+27.3%+35.0%+25.0%+4.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.8%-2.6%+25.9%+59.4%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.5%+100.0%+62.3%-123.5%-4.8%
TKO leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LYV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 83.0x trailing earnings, TKO trades at a 4% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LYV's 19.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGS's 501.2x.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…FWONK logoFWONKFormula One GroupTKO logoTKOTKO Group Holding…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…
Market CapShares × price$8.0B$20.8B$36.5B$3.2B$38.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$19.8B$39.7B$4.3B$44.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-357.55x82.98x86.64x-692.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.57.49x38.12x56.83x115.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate69.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple501.20x27.47x23.97x19.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.70x7.71x3.35x1.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.93x21.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF90.96x22.94x31.50x33.88x115.84x
LYV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FWONK leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSGE delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for TKO. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…FWONK logoFWONKFormula One GroupTKO logoTKOTKO Group Holding…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.1%+7.7%+4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.1%+42.6%+2.5%+1.8%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.5%+6.1%+8.5%+19.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%-0.5%+7.5%+11.0%+13.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953565
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x6.84x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.0B-$1.1B$3.2B$1.2B$5.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$153M$1.1B$831M$43M$7.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$0$4.1B$1.2B$12.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.68x3.35x6.00x4.43x3.68x
FWONK leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — TKO and LYV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $35,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,384 for MSGE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs FWONK's -0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 28.8% vs FWONK's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…FWONK logoFWONKFormula One GroupTKO logoTKOTKO Group Holding…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.5%-4.7%-9.0%+22.8%+14.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+74.7%-0.1%+12.1%+83.6%+24.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.8%+30.5%+83.0%+94.8%+113.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.5%+117.7%+256.4%-26.2%+108.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+321.1%+418.1%+1060.3%-24.6%+622.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.6%+9.3%+22.3%+24.9%+28.8%
Evenly matched — TKO and LYV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MSGS and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSGE's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGS currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TKO's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…FWONK logoFWONKFormula One GroupTKO logoTKOTKO Group Holding…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.61x0.35x0.64x0.94x0.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$345.50$109.36$226.94$69.86$175.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$186.00$80.15$152.29$35.31$125.34
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+85.5%+82.6%+95.5%+94.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.454.650.567.663.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded223K2.1M1.3M312K2.8M
Evenly matched — MSGS and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TKO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MSGS as "Buy", FWONK as "Buy", TKO as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", LYV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for TKO (target: $237) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66). TKO is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMSGS logoMSGSMadison Square Ga…FWONK logoFWONKFormula One GroupTKO logoTKOTKO Group Holding…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$363.67$116.33$236.67$66.29$181.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2924191244
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03$3.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%+2.4%+1.3%+0.1%
TKO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TKO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). LYV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallTKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MSGS vs FWONK vs TKO vs MSGE vs LYV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 83. 0x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV?

On trailing P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the cheapest at 83. 0x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV?

Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) delivered a total return of +256. 4%, compared to -26. 2% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1060% versus MSGE's -24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

35β versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning MSGE is approximately 166% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -138. 1% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV?

Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.

8% net margin versus -2. 2% for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 20. 3% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TKO leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) trades at 38. 1x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 77. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TKO: 26. 2% to $236. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV?

In this comparison, TKO (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. MSGS, FWONK, MSGE, LYV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MSGS or FWONK or TKO or MSGE or LYV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 8% yield, +1060% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1060%, MSGE: -24. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MSGS and FWONK and TKO and MSGE and LYV?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TKO pays a dividend while MSGS, FWONK, MSGE, LYV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MSGS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FWONK

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TKO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSGE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LYV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MSGS and FWONK and TKO and MSGE and LYV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MSGS: 12.8% · FWONK: -257.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.