Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Telecommunications Services
MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Specialty Business Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $9M | $607.77B | $1.46B | $4.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $72M | $98M | $876M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-25.02B | $-87M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 40.8% | 47.5% | 62.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.9% | -121.4% | -35.7% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.5x | — | 37.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $8.76B | $16M | $1.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $24.81B | $42M | $97M |
MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maris-Tech Ltd. (MTEK) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
| BlackSky Technology… (BKSY) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| Iridium Communicati… (IRDM) | 100 | 104.7 | +4.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTEK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 50.8%, EPS growth 52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.25, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 2.68x
- 50.8% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 37.3x)
BKSY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +244.5% vs MTEK's -48.2%
IRDM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 1.4%
- 427.6% 10Y total return vs BKSY's -49.7%
- Beta 1.08, yield 1.4%, current ratio 2.48x
- 12.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.8% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 37.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs SPIR's 3.10 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +244.5% vs MTEK's -48.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs MTEK's -50.9%, ROIC 8.0% vs 18.5% |
MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IRDM leads in 2 of 6 categories
MTEK leads 1 • BKSY leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRDM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRDM is the larger business by revenue, generating $876M annually — 84.7x MTEK's $10M. IRDM is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, IRDM holds the edge at +1.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $72M | $98M | $876M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$74M | -$2M | $439M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$25.0B | -$87M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$16.2B | -$85M | $305M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +40.8% | +47.5% | +62.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -121.4% | -35.7% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | -349.6% | -89.1% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | -227.0% | -87.3% | +34.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.3% | -26.9% | -29.7% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.1% | +59.5% | -22.4% | -25.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MTEK leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 71% valuation discount to IRDM's 39.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTEK's 5.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IRDM's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $607.8B | $1.5B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $591.7B | $1.4B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.31x | 11.48x | -18.88x | 39.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 37.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.59x | — | — | 13.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.54x | 8493.94x | 13.74x | 5.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 5.23x | 13.96x | 9.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MTEK and SPIR and IRDM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRDM delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-116 for MTEK. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRDM's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRDM scores 8/9 vs BKSY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -115.9% | -88.4% | -98.6% | +22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.9% | -47.3% | -24.0% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | -0.1% | -26.5% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.2% | -0.1% | -16.9% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.08x | 0.16x | 3.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$16.1B | -$27M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $24.8B | $42M | $97M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $8.8B | $16M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.85x | 9.20x | -5.96x | 2.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKSY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRDM five years ago would be worth $11,898 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,337 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, BKSY leads with a +244.5% total return vs MTEK's -48.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKSY at 61.1% vs IRDM's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.5% | +136.7% | +89.5% | +134.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.2% | +93.8% | +244.5% | +61.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.0% | +242.0% | +317.9% | -31.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -76.6% | -50.3% | +19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -75.7% | -49.7% | +427.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | +50.7% | +61.1% | -12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IRDM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRDM is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRDM currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs MTEK's 27.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 3.10x | 2.99x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.27 | $23.59 | $42.75 | $44.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $6.60 | $9.25 | $15.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.4% | +78.4% | +92.3% | +93.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.9 | 47.7 | 47.7 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.6M | 1.9M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", BKSY as "Buy", IRDM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -6.7% upside for SPIR (target: $17) vs -14.4% for IRDM (target: $36). IRDM is the only dividend payer here at 1.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $34.13 | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 8 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.58 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.3% |
IRDM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MTEK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MTEK vs SPIR vs BKSY vs IRDM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Maris-Tech Ltd.
(MTEK) is the stronger pick with 50. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Iridium Communications Inc. at 39. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM?
Over the past 5 years, Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) delivered a total return of +19. 0%, compared to -76. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRDM returned +427. 6% versus SPIR's -75. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 188% more volatile than IRDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 4% for Iridium Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Maris-Tech Ltd.
(MTEK) is pulling ahead at 50. 8% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Iridium Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTEK leads at 43. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -65. 9% for BlackSky Technology Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRDM leads at 27. 1% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRDM leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPIR: -6.
7% to $17. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM?
In this comparison, IRDM (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MTEK, SPIR, BKSY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTEK or SPIR or BKSY or IRDM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 1. 4% yield, +427. 6% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRDM: +427. 6%, SPIR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTEK and SPIR and BKSY and IRDM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MTEK (Technology) and SPIR (Industrials) and BKSY (Technology) and IRDM (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MTEK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; BKSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IRDM pays a dividend while MTEK, SPIR, BKSY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.