Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MXL vs CIEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
MXL vs CIEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $7.27B | $81.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $509M | $5.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $229M |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 62.7x | 93.8x |
| Total Debt | $157M | $1.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $74M | $1.09B |
MXL vs CIEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) | 100 | 469.0 | +369.0% |
| Ciena Corporation (CIEN) | 100 | 1043.8 | +943.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MXL vs CIEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MXL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth 46.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -25.3%
- 29.7% revenue growth vs CIEN's 18.8%
- Lower P/E (62.7x vs 93.8x)
CIEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 2.46
- 34.5% 10Y total return vs MXL's 396.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.46, Low D/E 58.0%, current ratio 2.73x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs CIEN's 18.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (62.7x vs 93.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs MXL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.46 vs MXL's 2.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs MXL's +6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs MXL's -16.3%, ROIC 6.9% vs -17.6% |
MXL vs CIEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MXL vs CIEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 10.1x MXL's $509M. CIEN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MXL's -26.0%. On growth, MXL holds the edge at +43.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $509M | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | $571M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | $229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $742M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.0% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | +4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.0% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MXL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $81.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $82.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -51.41x | 678.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.70x | 93.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 181.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.55x | 17.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.56x | 30.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1035.82x | 122.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CIEN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CIEN delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-28 for MXL. MXL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIEN's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIEN scores 8/9 vs MXL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.7% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -17.6% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.6% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $83M | $490M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $74M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $157M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.75x | 3.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIEN five years ago would be worth $109,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,518 for MXL. Over the past 12 months, CIEN leads with a +693.8% total return vs MXL's +668.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIEN at 136.1% vs MXL's 50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +338.8% | +134.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +668.5% | +693.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.6% | +1215.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.2% | +991.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +396.2% | +3447.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.5% | +136.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CIEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIEN is the less volatile stock with a 2.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MXL's 2.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIEN currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs MXL's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.77x | 2.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.43 | $583.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.16 | $70.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 88.3 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MXL as "Buy" and CIEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -35.1% upside for MXL (target: $53) vs -42.1% for CIEN (target: $334).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.71 | $334.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% |
CIEN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MXL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MXL vs CIEN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MXL or CIEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MaxLinear, Inc.
(MXL) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 8% for Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Ciena Corporation (CIEN) offers the better valuation at 678. 6x trailing P/E (93. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MXL or CIEN?
On forward P/E, MaxLinear, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 62. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MXL or CIEN?
Over the past 5 years, Ciena Corporation (CIEN) delivered a total return of +991.
4%, compared to +135. 2% for MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIEN returned +34. 5% versus MXL's +396. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MXL or CIEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
46β versus MaxLinear, Inc. 's 2. 77β — meaning MXL is approximately 13% more volatile than CIEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 58% for Ciena Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MXL or CIEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MaxLinear, Inc.
(MXL) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus 18. 8% for Ciena Corporation (CIEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ciena Corporation grew EPS 46. 6% year-over-year, compared to 46. 1% for MaxLinear, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIEN leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MXL or CIEN?
Ciena Corporation (CIEN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
6% net margin versus -29. 2% for MaxLinear, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIEN leads at 6. 5% versus -27. 1% for MXL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MXL leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MXL or CIEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MaxLinear, Inc.
(MXL) trades at 62. 7x forward P/E versus 93. 8x for Ciena Corporation — 31. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MXL: -35. 1% to $52. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — MXL or CIEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MXL or CIEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MaxLinear, Inc.
(MXL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+396. 2% 10Y return). Ciena Corporation (CIEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MXL: +396. 2%, CIEN: +34. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MXL and CIEN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.