Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Travel Services
MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | — | $1.71B | $1.93B | $81.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $1.65B | $2.90B | $12.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-426K | $150M | $-1.62B | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 65.4% | 54.8% | 82.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 20.7% | -44.9% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 308.7x | 9.5x | — | 27.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.09B | $2.35B | $5.43B | $2.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $100M | $91M | $6.56B |
MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 111.3 | +11.3% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 92.3 | -7.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYCC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.56
- 94.1% 10Y total return vs ABNB's -6.4%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 27.3x)
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.4%, EPS growth -5.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.5%
- 14.4% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
ABNB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 25.2%, current ratio 1.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 1.38x
- 19.9% margin vs FUN's -56.0%
- Beta 1.31 vs FUN's 1.87, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.4% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 27.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs FUN's -56.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs FUN's 1.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.9% vs FUN's -50.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs FUN's -18.5%, ROIC 50.6% vs -15.1% |
MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABNB leads in 4 of 6 categories
MYCC leads 0 • PRKS leads 0 • FUN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABNB is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 11.5x MYCC's $1.1B. ABNB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -56.0%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.7B | $2.9B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $196M | $520M | -$810M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$426,000 | $150M | -$1.6B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $291M | $166M | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +65.4% | +54.8% | +82.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +20.7% | -44.9% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +9.1% | -56.0% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +17.6% | +5.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -3.0% | -100.0% | +17.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.0% | -137.9% | -20.5% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRKS and FUN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 96% valuation discount to MYCC's 308.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 30.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $1.7B | $1.9B | $81.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $4.0B | $7.3B | $76.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 308.66x | 11.49x | -1.19x | 33.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.47x | — | 27.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.28x | — | 30.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.03x | 0.62x | 6.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.76x | — | 2.44x | 10.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.50x | — | 17.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB delivers a 31.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FUN. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MYCC's 7.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYCC scores 6/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | — | -50.4% | +31.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +5.6% | -18.5% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +15.4% | -15.1% | +50.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +16.9% | -17.7% | +26.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.63x | — | 6.92x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $2.3B | $5.3B | -$4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $100M | $91M | $6.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $2.4B | $5.4B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.10x | 2.59x | -2.60x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABNB five years ago would be worth $9,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,689 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, ABNB leads with a +0.9% total return vs FUN's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABNB at 8.8% vs FUN's -22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -3.0% | +22.0% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -28.8% | -50.4% | +0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -38.6% | -52.7% | +28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -29.0% | -53.1% | -3.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.6% | +94.1% | -39.3% | -6.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -15.0% | -22.1% | +8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ABNB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABNB is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 49.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.56x | 1.87x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $56.95 | $38.47 | $147.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $28.77 | $12.51 | $110.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +61.7% | +49.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 54.4 | 54.9 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 950K | 1.8M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRKS as "Buy", FUN as "Buy", ABNB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.4% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 12.3% for ABNB (target: $152).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $47.60 | $23.00 | $152.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 29 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +1.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% |
ABNB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
MYCC vs PRKS vs FUN vs ABNB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 14.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. at 308. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB?
Over the past 5 years, Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) delivered a total return of -3. 4%, compared to -53. 1% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +94. 1% versus FUN's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 87β — meaning FUN is approximately 42% more volatile than ABNB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 8% for ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 14.
4% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 136. 9% year-over-year, compared to -591. 3% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus -50. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 3% versus -43. 7% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYCC leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for Airbnb, Inc. — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 35. 4% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MYCC or PRKS or FUN or ABNB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABNB: -6. 4%, MYCC: +34. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYCC and PRKS and FUN and ABNB?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.