Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Packaging & Containers
Financial - Credit Services
Apparel - Manufacturers
MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Chemicals - Specialty | Packaging & Containers | Financial - Credit Services | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $837M | $1.91B | $4.25B | $225M | $1.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $784M | $1.78B | $6.58B | $353M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $117M | $283M | $47M | $-59M |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 27.7% | 17.4% | 96.7% | 20.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 8.7% | 9.8% | 50.5% | -2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 15.5x | 10.6x | 8.0x | 23.8x |
| Total Debt | $379M | $90M | $4.62B | $316M | $456M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $293M | $1.08B | $202M | $112M |
MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myers Industries, I… (MYE) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Innospec Inc. (IOSP) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Albany Internationa… (AIN) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.3%, EPS growth 389.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- 95.4% 10Y total return vs AIN's 84.5%
- +97.8% vs SLGN's -23.7%
IOSP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 6.7%, current ratio 2.79x
- 6.5% ROA vs AIN's -3.5%, ROIC 11.2% vs -1.1%
SLGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.66 vs MYE's 1.33
- 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs MFIN's 4.7%
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs AIN's -3.9%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 23.8x)
- 12.2% margin vs AIN's -4.9%
Among these 5 stocks, AIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs AIN's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 23.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs AIN's -4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs MYE's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs MFIN's 4.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.8% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs AIN's -3.5%, ROIC 11.2% vs -1.1% |
MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IOSP leads 1 • MYE leads 0 • SLGN leads 0 • AIN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 18.6x MFIN's $353M. MFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIN's -4.9%. On growth, AIN holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $784M | $1.8B | $6.6B | $353M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $198M | $966M | $111M | $59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | $117M | $283M | $47M | -$59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $88M | $307M | $126M | $92M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +27.7% | +17.4% | +96.7% | +20.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +8.7% | +9.8% | +50.5% | -2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +6.6% | +4.3% | +12.2% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +4.9% | +4.7% | +35.7% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | -2.4% | +6.5% | — | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.8% | +167.7% | -6.3% | +16.3% | -3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 78% valuation discount to MYE's 24.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AIN's 29.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $837M | $1.9B | $4.3B | $225M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $1.7B | $7.8B | $340M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.06x | 16.41x | 14.91x | 5.37x | -31.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.34x | 15.45x | 10.60x | 7.97x | 23.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.38x | 8.29x | 7.97x | 1.90x | 29.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 1.07x | 0.66x | 0.64x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.86x | 1.44x | 1.89x | 0.46x | 2.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.46x | 21.68x | 10.07x | 1.78x | 21.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IOSP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYE delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AIN. IOSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs AIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.5% | +9.0% | +12.5% | +9.4% | -7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +6.5% | +3.0% | +1.6% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +11.2% | +8.7% | +17.2% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +11.0% | +9.9% | +10.0% | -1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 0.07x | 2.03x | 0.62x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | -$203M | $3.5B | $115M | $343M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $293M | $1.1B | $202M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $379M | $90M | $4.6B | $316M | $456M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.39x | — | 3.36x | 1.07x | -0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MYE and MFIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFIN five years ago would be worth $12,317 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,407 for AIN. Over the past 12 months, MYE leads with a +97.8% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MFIN at 16.7% vs AIN's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.0% | +0.5% | -1.9% | -4.9% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.8% | -14.9% | -23.7% | +8.2% | -2.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | -17.3% | -11.1% | +58.9% | -28.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.0% | -18.3% | +1.4% | +23.2% | -25.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +84.4% | +80.8% | +60.3% | +84.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | -6.1% | -3.8% | +16.7% | -10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MYE and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MYE's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MYE currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.70x | 0.66x | 1.15x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.25 | $95.55 | $57.04 | $11.00 | $73.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.39 | $65.58 | $36.15 | $7.88 | $41.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +80.2% | +70.6% | +86.9% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 59.1 | 51.1 | 55.0 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 214K | 221K | 769K | 59K | 249K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLGN and MFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYE as "Buy", IOSP as "Hold", SLGN as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", AIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for IOSP (target: $115) vs -10.8% for AIN (target: $55). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs AIN's 1.78%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $115.00 | $50.50 | — | $55.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 9 | 21 | 9 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.2% | +2.0% | +4.7% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 21 | 4 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $1.70 | $0.80 | $0.45 | $1.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% | +10.6% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IOSP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MYE vs IOSP vs SLGN vs MFIN vs AIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Albany International Corp. (AIN). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Myers Industries, Inc. at 24. 1x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN?
Over the past 5 years, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -25. 9% for Albany International Corp. (AIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYE returned +95. 4% versus MFIN's +60. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Myers Industries, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning MYE is approximately 101% more volatile than SLGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -3. 9% for Albany International Corp. (AIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Myers Industries, Inc. grew EPS 389. 5% year-over-year, compared to -169. 3% for Albany International Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIN leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN?
Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus -4. 8% for Albany International Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -1. 4% for AIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 8x for Albany International Corp. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOSP: 50. 1% to $115. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 1. 8% for Albany International Corp. (AIN).
09Is MYE or IOSP or SLGN or MFIN or AIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGN: +80. 8%, MYE: +95. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYE and IOSP and SLGN and MFIN and AIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (MYE (Consumer Cyclical) and IOSP (Basic Materials) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical) and MFIN (Financial Services) and AIN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.