MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG

For growth investors, Myomo, Inc.

(MYO) is the stronger pick with 25. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) offers the better valuation at 57. 6x trailing P/E (43. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 27. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -90. 9% for Myomo, Inc. (MYO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus MYO's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 222% more volatile than ISRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 17% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Myomo, Inc.

(MYO) is pulling ahead at 25. 7% versus 19. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -131. 3% for Myomo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYO leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Alphatec Holdings, Inc.

(ATEC) trades at 27. 1x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 16. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATEC: 222. 6% to $25. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +554. 2% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ISRG: +554. 2%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.