Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $28.05B | $6.34B | $10.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.94B | $24.99B | $10.04B | $8.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $176M | $-5.76B | $550M | $-1.26B |
| Gross Margin | 24.2% | 33.9% | 29.3% | 33.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | -18.9% | 12.1% | -8.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 11.6x | 9.7x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $21.22B | $7.21B | $7.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $2.62B | $132M | $70M |
MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Marzetti Company (MZTI) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
| The Kraft Heinz Com… (KHC) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| The J. M. Smucker C… (SJM) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MZTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 9.1% margin vs KHC's -23.0%
- 13.5% ROA vs SJM's -7.7%, ROIC 19.3% vs -3.4%
KHC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.15, yield 6.8%, current ratio 1.15x
CPB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.0x)
- 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SJM's 4.3%
SJM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 4.3%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs MZTI's 19.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.81x
- 6.7% revenue growth vs KHC's -3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% revenue growth vs KHC's -3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs KHC's -23.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MZTI's 0.32 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SJM's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.5% vs CPB's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs SJM's -7.7%, ROIC 19.3% vs -3.4% |
MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KHC leads in 1 of 6 categories
CPB leads 1 • MZTI leads 1 • SJM leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KHC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 12.9x MZTI's $1.9B. MZTI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KHC's -23.0%. On growth, SJM holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $25.0B | $10.0B | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292M | -$4.0B | $1.6B | -$595M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $176M | -$5.8B | $550M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $248M | $3.9B | $919M | $971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +33.9% | +29.3% | +33.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -18.9% | +12.1% | -8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -23.0% | +5.5% | -14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +15.8% | +9.2% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +0.8% | -4.5% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +11.7% | -17.2% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CPB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, CPB trades at a 45% valuation discount to MZTI's 19.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CPB's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MZTI's 11.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $28.1B | $6.3B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $46.7B | $13.4B | $18.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.27x | -4.80x | 10.57x | -8.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.68x | 11.63x | 9.74x | 11.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.72x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.98x | — | 7.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 1.12x | 0.62x | 1.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.22x | 0.67x | 1.63x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.76x | 7.66x | 8.99x | 12.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MZTI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MZTI delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-24 for SJM. MZTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs SJM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | -13.8% | +14.0% | -24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.5% | -7.0% | +3.7% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | -5.5% | +9.1% | -3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.9% | -6.1% | +11.4% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.51x | 1.85x | 1.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$106M | $18.6B | $7.1B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $2.6B | $132M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $21.2B | $7.2B | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -6.02x | 3.14x | -1.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SJM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SJM five years ago would be worth $8,802 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,806 for CPB. Over the past 12 months, SJM leads with a -7.5% total return vs CPB's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SJM at -10.6% vs CPB's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.3% | -1.4% | -20.5% | +4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | -10.5% | -35.4% | -7.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | -30.7% | -52.6% | -28.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | -27.2% | -41.9% | -12.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -50.2% | -44.9% | +5.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.3% | -11.5% | -22.0% | -10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPB and SJM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPB is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MZTI's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SJM currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 0.15x | -0.02x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.96 | $29.19 | $36.16 | $119.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $111.04 | $21.04 | $19.76 | $88.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +81.0% | +58.8% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.8 | 58.7 | 46.7 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 300K | 15.2M | 9.1M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPB and SJM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MZTI as "Hold", KHC as "Hold", CPB as "Hold", SJM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.8% upside for MZTI (target: $160) vs -1.2% for KHC (target: $23). For income investors, CPB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.20% vs MZTI's 3.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $160.00 | $23.38 | $25.83 | $113.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 35 | 29 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +6.8% | +7.2% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.77 | $1.60 | $1.53 | $4.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +0.0% |
KHC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CPB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MZTI vs KHC vs CPB vs SJM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC). Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Marzetti Company (MZTI) a "Hold" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM?
On trailing P/E, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus The Marzetti Company at 19. 3x. On forward P/E, Campbell Soup Company is actually cheaper at 9. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM?
Over the past 5 years, The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) delivered a total return of -12. 0%, compared to -41. 9% for Campbell Soup Company (CPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MZTI returned +19. 9% versus KHC's -50. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus The Marzetti Company's 0. 32β — meaning MZTI is approximately -1927% more volatile than CPB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Marzetti Company (MZTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus -3. 5% for The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -318. 1% for The Kraft Heinz Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM?
The Marzetti Company (MZTI) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
8% net margin versus -23. 4% for The Kraft Heinz Company — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPB leads at 13. 2% versus -18. 7% for KHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SJM leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) trades at 9.
7x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for The Marzetti Company — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MZTI: 36. 8% to $160. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 3. 2% for The Marzetti Company (MZTI).
09Is MZTI or KHC or CPB or SJM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), 7. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPB: -44. 9%, MZTI: +19. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MZTI and KHC and CPB and SJM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MZTI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KHC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SJM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.