Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NA
Nano Labs Ltd

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$140M
5Y Perf.-97.8%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.58B
5Y Perf.+250.4%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-2.2%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+229.4%

NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NA logoNA
CLSK logoCLSK
MARA logoMARA
RIOT logoRIOT
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$140M$3.58B$4.83B$9.14B
Revenue (TTM)$24M$785M$907M$647M
Net Income (TTM)$-63M$-261M$-1.31B$-867M
Gross Margin48.8%41.4%-47.7%-15.6%
Operating Margin-322.5%-26.4%-90.6%-61.8%
Forward P/E0.0x12.5x
Total Debt$199M$824M$3.65B$280M
Cash & Equiv.$32M$43M$547M$234M

NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NA
CLSK
MARA
RIOT
StockJul 22May 26Return
Nano Labs Ltd (NA)1002.2-97.8%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100350.4+250.4%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10097.8-2.2%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100329.4+229.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NA and CLSK are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. CleanSpark, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. RIOT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
The Defensive Pick

NA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 85.4%, current ratio 1.75x
  • Beta 1.37, current ratio 1.75x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 1.37 vs RIOT's 3.87
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Income Pick

CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.39, yield 0.2%
  • Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
  • 102.2% revenue growth vs NA's -48.2%
  • -33.2% margin vs NA's -261.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs CLSK's -84.3%
  • +207.5% vs NA's -52.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLSK logoCLSK102.2% revenue growth vs NA's -48.2%
ValueNA logoNABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCLSK logoCLSK-33.2% margin vs NA's -261.0%
Stability / SafetyNA logoNABeta 1.37 vs RIOT's 3.87
DividendsCLSK logoCLSK0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RIOT logoRIOT+207.5% vs NA's -52.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NA logoNA-4.3% ROA vs RIOT's -21.5%, ROIC -30.4% vs -8.7%

NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NANano Labs Ltd
FY 2024
Product
84.0%$34M
Service
16.0%$6M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M

NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLSKLAGGINGRIOT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CLSK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 37.6x NA's $24M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -33.2% (CLSK) to -2.6% (NA). On growth, CLSK holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNA logoNANano Labs LtdCLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$24M$785M$907M$647M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$66M$181M$627M-$450M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$63M-$261M-$1.3B-$867M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$117M-$1.0B-$312M-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.8%+41.4%-47.7%-15.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%-26.4%-90.6%-61.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.6%-33.2%-144.6%-102.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.9%-133.1%-34.4%-119.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.5%+11.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+50.0%-2.6%-4.8%-60.0%
CLSK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CLSK and MARA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricNA logoNANano Labs LtdCLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Market CapShares × price$140M$3.6B$4.8B$9.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$165M$4.4B$7.9B$9.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.44x12.48x-3.44x-12.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue23.48x4.67x5.32x14.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.09x2.04x1.30x2.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — CLSK and MARA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NA and CLSK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

NA delivers a -10.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-10 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNA logoNANano Labs LtdCLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.2%-13.7%-30.5%-28.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.3%-8.5%-17.1%-21.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-30.4%+10.3%-9.0%-8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-38.3%+13.7%-12.1%-11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94533
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.85x0.38x1.05x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$166M$781M$3.1B$46M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$43M$547M$234M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$199M$824M$3.6B$280M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.56x-18.49x4.73x-16.47x
Evenly matched — NA and CLSK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CLSK and RIOT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLSK five years ago would be worth $7,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $172 for NA. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs NA's -52.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 48.8% vs NA's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNA logoNANano Labs LtdCLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-36.9%+21.0%+28.2%+70.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-52.2%+74.1%-4.7%+207.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-80.7%+229.7%+36.1%+129.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.3%-26.9%-59.5%-27.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.3%-84.3%-51.6%+787.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-42.2%+48.8%+10.8%+32.0%
Evenly matched — CLSK and RIOT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NA is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs NA's 6.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNA logoNANano Labs LtdCLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.37x3.39x3.11x3.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.48$23.61$23.45$24.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.58$7.91$6.66$7.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.6%+59.2%+54.2%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.671.569.674.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded82K19.0M47.6M18.4M
Evenly matched — NA and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NA as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNA logoNANano Labs LtdCLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.21$16.13$27.90
# AnalystsCovering analysts23101918
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.1%+1.0%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CLSK leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallCleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NA vs CLSK vs MARA vs RIOT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -48. 2% for Nano Labs Ltd (NA). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano Labs Ltd (NA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT?

Over the past 5 years, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) delivered a total return of -26. 9%, compared to -98. 3% for Nano Labs Ltd (NA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus NA's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Labs Ltd (NA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

37β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 183% more volatile than NA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -48. 2% for Nano Labs Ltd (NA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT?

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -278. 8% for Nano Labs Ltd — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -242. 7% for NA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 44.

6% to $20. 21.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT?

In this comparison, CLSK (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. NA, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NA or CLSK or MARA or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NA and CLSK and MARA and RIOT?

These companies operate in different sectors (NA (Technology) and CLSK (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NA and CLSK and MARA and RIOT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NA: -66.5% · CLSK: 11.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.