Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Information Technology Services
Telecommunications Services
NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Entertainment | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $11M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $25M | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $406M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $299M | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-4M | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 22.8% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 29.5% | 15.5% | -1.4% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.6x | 24.8x | 16.5x | — | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $34M | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $93M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $28M | $9.48B |
NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI) | 100 | 9.5 | -90.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 77.4 | -22.6% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 69.9 | -30.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAMI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.17x
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 15.4%
- 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
- 24.3% margin vs CLPS's -1.3%
DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.7% vs NAMI's -86.9%
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.21 vs DIS's 0.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs CLPS's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs DIS's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs NAMI's -86.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs -7.9% |
NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
NAMI leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • CMCSA leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 418.7x CLPS's $299M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLPS's -1.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $406M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $299M | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $30.1B | $20.5B | -$1M | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$4M | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $9.5B | $7.1B | $0 | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +22.8% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +29.5% | +15.5% | -1.4% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -1.3% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +20.9% | +7.3% | -2.3% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +15.3% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.7% | +31.1% | -29.8% | +75.8% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLPS and CMCSA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NAMI trades at a 90% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $25M | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $31M | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.60x | 34.89x | 15.87x | -3.48x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 16.53x | — | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.21x | 12.61x | 12.10x | — | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 0.15x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 0.43x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 19.11x | — | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NAMI and NFLX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NAMI delivers a 94.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $95 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CLPS. NAMI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +94.8% | +41.3% | +9.8% | -6.1% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -3.2% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% | -7.9% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +30.5% | +8.5% | -9.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.59x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $6M | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $93M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $28M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $34M | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 9.95x | — | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $869 for NAMI. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs NAMI's -86.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs NAMI's -55.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.2% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -10.3% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.9% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -5.4% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +0.5% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -69.3% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -78.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.7% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +0.2% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DIS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs NAMI's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.27x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.98 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $1.88 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $0.80 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.7% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +48.2% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 49.8 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 15K | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 21.5% for CMCSA (target: $32). For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $139.50 | — | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | — | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +14.6% | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 3 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $0.13 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +7.5% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
NAMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs CLPS vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) is the cheapest at 3.
6x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -91. 3% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus NAMI's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus The Walt Disney Company's 0. 90β — meaning DIS is approximately 330% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAMI leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -4. 3% for CLPS Incorporation — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -4. 0% for CLPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), CMCSA (5. 1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NAMI, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NAMI or NFLX or DIS or CLPS or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, NAMI: -91. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAMI and NFLX and DIS and CLPS and CMCSA?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAMI (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and CLPS (Technology) and CMCSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NAMI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DIS, CLPS, CMCSA pay a dividend while NAMI, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.