Gold
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Gold
NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $93M | $10.98B | $2.47B | $50.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-24M | $150.28B | $15.96B | $10.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $26.34B | $4.82B | $2.86B |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 38.3% | 40.3% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 30.9% | 25.1% | 45.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 0.4x | 0.6x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.23B | $17M | $2.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $698K | $13.10B | $1.31B | $2.93B |
NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Namib Minerals Ordi… (NAMM) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| Harmony Gold Mining… (HMY) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
| DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) | 100 | 190.3 | +90.3% |
| AngloGold Ashanti P… (AU) | 100 | 228.7 | +128.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAMM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.01, yield 9.5%
- 9.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HMY's 1.1%
HMY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (0.4x vs 9.2x)
DRD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 2.28x
- 30.2% margin vs NAMM's 4.2%
- Beta 0.52 vs NAMM's 2.01
- 32.9% ROA vs NAMM's -67.7%
AU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 70.8%, EPS growth 122.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs DRD's 5.5%
- Beta 0.79, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.87x
- 70.8% revenue growth vs HMY's 20.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.8% revenue growth vs HMY's 20.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.4x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs NAMM's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs NAMM's 2.01 | |
| Dividends | 9.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HMY's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.5% vs NAMM's -84.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.9% ROA vs NAMM's -67.7% |
NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AU leads in 2 of 6 categories
HMY leads 1 • NAMM leads 1 • DRD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HMY and NAMM operate at a comparable scale, with $150.3B and -$24M in trailing revenue. DRD is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAMM's 4.2%. On growth, AU holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$24M | $150.3B | $16.0B | $10.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $56.7B | $4.9B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | $26.3B | $4.8B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$604,001 | $20.4B | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +38.3% | +40.3% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +30.9% | +25.1% | +45.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +17.5% | +30.2% | +27.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +13.6% | +6.8% | +32.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | +25.4% | +26.6% | +75.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.3% | +17.2% | +89.0% | +63.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NAMM and HMY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, HMY trades at a 52% valuation discount to NAMM's 26.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NAMM's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DRD's 28.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93M | $11.0B | $2.5B | $50.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $10.3B | $2.4B | $50.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.40x | 12.59x | 18.07x | 19.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.44x | 0.37x | 0.61x | 9.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.08x | 6.71x | 28.50x | 9.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 2.43x | 5.14x | 5.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.73x | 4.57x | 5.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.22x | 16.67x | 32.24x | 16.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HMY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HMY delivers a 56.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $31 for AU. DRD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AU's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HMY scores 8/9 vs DRD's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +56.1% | +44.8% | +30.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.7% | +32.8% | +32.9% | +20.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +40.1% | +9.8% | +35.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +35.3% | +9.3% | +35.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$10.9B | -$1.3B | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $698,000 | $13.1B | $1.3B | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.2B | $17M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.65x | 44.14x | 274.61x | 21.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AU five years ago would be worth $45,696 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,582 for NAMM. Over the past 12 months, AU leads with a +137.5% total return vs NAMM's -84.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AU at 54.8% vs NAMM's -45.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +78.3% | -8.9% | -4.7% | +19.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.2% | +11.3% | +91.2% | +137.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +244.5% | +123.5% | +271.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +252.3% | +180.8% | +357.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +460.0% | +546.6% | +653.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.9% | +51.0% | +30.7% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DRD and AU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRD is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAMM's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AU currently trades 77.6% from its 52-week high vs NAMM's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 0.90x | 0.52x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.00 | $26.06 | $39.37 | $129.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.91 | $12.58 | $12.75 | $38.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +67.5% | +72.6% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.1 | 57.2 | 50.3 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 680K | 5.2M | 309K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
NAMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HMY as "Hold", DRD as "Buy", AU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.8% upside for DRD (target: $47) vs 32.8% for AU (target: $133). For income investors, NAMM offers the higher dividend yield at 9.52% vs DRD's 1.06%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.50 | $133.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.5% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $3.27 | $4.97 | $3.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HMY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
NAMM vs HMY vs DRD vs AU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the stronger pick with 70.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 4% for Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY). Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (0. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU?
On trailing P/E, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is the cheapest at 12.
6x versus Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU?
Over the past 5 years, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) delivered a total return of +357.
0%, compared to -84. 2% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AU returned +653. 9% versus NAMM's -84. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares's 2. 01β — meaning NAMM is approximately 289% more volatile than DRD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for AngloGold Ashanti Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is pulling ahead at 70.
8% versus 20. 4% for Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngloGold Ashanti Plc grew EPS 122. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, AU leads at 30. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU?
DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
5% net margin versus 4. 2% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AU leads at 45. 1% versus 11. 6% for DRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AU leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) trades at 0.
4x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for AngloGold Ashanti Plc — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DRD: 62. 8% to $46. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM) offers the highest yield at 9. 5%, versus 1. 1% for DRDGOLD Limited (DRD).
09Is NAMM or HMY or DRD or AU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 1. 1% yield, +546. 6% 10Y return). Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRD: +546. 6%, NAMM: -84. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAMM and HMY and DRD and AU?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.