Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Business Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Business Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.26B | $2.77B | $615M | $10.57B | $30.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.38B | $861M | $204M | $2.52B | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $174M | $96M | $35M | $519M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 79.2% | 88.6% | 44.1% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 12.8% | 19.0% | 26.0% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 15.9x | 15.9x | 21.8x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $225M | $76M | $5M | $0.00 | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $456M | $457M | $392M | $102M | $798M |
NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCR Atleos Corporat… (NATL) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 174.4 | +74.4% |
| Cass Information Sy… (CASS) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 42.8 | -57.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NATL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 99.0% 10Y total return vs NTCT's 66.6%
NTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +80.5% vs FISV's -68.8%
CASS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 1.10x
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.10x
- 2.6% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 7.2% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1%
- 20.6% margin vs NATL's 4.0%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs JKHY's 2.16
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.20 vs 2.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.20 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs NATL's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NATL's 1.16 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs CASS's 1.4% |
NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • NATL leads 1 • NTCT leads 0 • CASS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 103.6x CASS's $204M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NATL's 4.0%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $861M | $204M | $2.5B | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $357M | $171M | $44M | $810M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $174M | $96M | $35M | $519M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $275M | $32M | $728M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +79.2% | +88.6% | +44.1% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +12.8% | +19.0% | +26.0% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +11.1% | +17.3% | +20.6% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +32.0% | +15.6% | +28.9% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | -0.5% | -10.1% | +8.7% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +11.9% | +87.9% | +12.5% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 62% valuation discount to JKHY's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs JKHY's 2.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.8B | $615M | $10.6B | $30.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $2.4B | $227M | $10.5B | $58.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.68x | -7.57x | 18.25x | 23.40x | 8.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.14x | 15.87x | 15.87x | 21.79x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.13x | 2.32x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.02x | — | 5.86x | 13.53x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 3.36x | 3.22x | 4.45x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.32x | 1.78x | 2.64x | 5.01x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.66x | 13.11x | 19.35x | 17.97x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NATL delivers a 47.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $6 for NTCT. CASS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASS scores 8/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.0% | +6.1% | +14.6% | +24.0% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +4.3% | +1.4% | +17.0% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | -19.3% | — | +21.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -18.5% | +4.4% | +22.7% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.05x | 0.02x | — | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231M | -$381M | -$388M | -$102M | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $456M | $457M | $392M | $102M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225M | $76M | $5M | $0 | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.62x | 55.89x | — | 122.37x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATL five years ago would be worth $19,777 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,829 for FISV. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +80.5% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATL at 25.5% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | +42.6% | +18.1% | -17.8% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.3% | +80.5% | +17.2% | -13.6% | -68.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.8% | +30.3% | +37.5% | -1.0% | -52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.8% | +42.9% | +15.6% | +0.3% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.0% | +66.6% | +57.2% | +94.9% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +9.2% | +11.2% | -0.3% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTCT and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NATL's 1.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.12x | 0.74x | 0.28x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.50 | $39.24 | $52.45 | $193.39 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.56 | $19.98 | $36.07 | $141.81 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +97.6% | +90.8% | +75.5% | +29.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 68.6 | 52.5 | 28.2 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 552K | 74K | 902K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CASS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NATL as "Hold", NTCT as "Hold", CASS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.5% upside for JKHY (target: $204) vs -24.3% for NTCT (target: $29). For income investors, CASS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.40 | $29.00 | $50.00 | $203.75 | $74.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 21 | 2 | 22 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 21 | 32 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.23 | $2.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.9% | +4.2% | +0.3% | +19.4% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NATL vs NTCT vs CASS vs JKHY vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL) delivered a total return of +97.
8%, compared to -51. 7% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NATL returned +99. 0% versus FISV's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus NCR Atleos Corporation's 1. 16β — meaning NATL is approximately 309% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cass Information Systems, Inc. grew EPS 87. 8% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JKHY: 39. 5% to $203. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV?
In this comparison, CASS (2.
6% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NATL, NTCT, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NATL or NTCT or CASS or JKHY or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, NATL: +99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NATL and NTCT and CASS and JKHY and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (NATL (Technology) and NTCT (Technology) and CASS (Industrials) and JKHY (Technology) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NATL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CASS, JKHY pay a dividend while NATL, NTCT, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.