Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $366M | $1.11B | $105M | $498M | $21.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $413M | $16M | $160M | $4.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-8M | $-79M | $-546M | $853M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.2% | 40.7% | 28.2% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.3% | -5.2% | -346.1% | 20.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x | — | — | 26.8x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $20M | $26M | $759M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $65M | $41M | $64M | $1.42B |
NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nautilus Biotechnol… (NAUT) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| CareDx, Inc (CDNA) | 100 | 29.6 | -70.4% |
| Seer, Inc. (SEER) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| Pacific Biosciences… (PACB) | 100 | 6.4 | -93.6% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +311.5% vs SEER's +1.6%
CDNA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -143.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- 13.8% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1%
- Better valuation composite
SEER is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.84
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 16.53x
- Beta 0.84, current ratio 16.53x
- Beta 0.84 vs PACB's 2.43, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, PACB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ILMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 0.7% 10Y total return vs CDNA's 385.1%
- 19.4% margin vs SEER's -486.0%
- 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.8% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs SEER's -486.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs PACB's 2.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +311.5% vs SEER's +1.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8% |
NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CDNA leads 2 • NAUT leads 0 • SEER leads 0 • PACB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN and NAUT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEER's -4.9%. On growth, CDNA holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $413M | $16M | $160M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | $2M | -$76M | -$169M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$8M | -$79M | -$546M | $853M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | $65M | -$46M | -$124M | $989M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +48.2% | +40.7% | +28.2% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -3.3% | -5.2% | -3.5% | +20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% | -4.9% | -3.4% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.8% | -2.8% | -77.4% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +39.0% | +4.5% | +13.8% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | +126.3% | +8.6% | — | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $366M | $1.1B | $105M | $498M | $21.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $384M | $1.1B | $90M | $1.2B | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.13x | -53.60x | -1.35x | -0.91x | 25.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.85x | — | — | 26.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 6.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 19.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.92x | 7.52x | 3.11x | 4.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 3.77x | 0.36x | 92.53x | 7.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.66x | — | — | 22.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for PACB. CDNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs NAUT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.0% | -2.6% | -29.2% | -11.2% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.2% | -1.9% | -25.7% | -66.8% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.0% | -5.7% | -21.3% | -45.8% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.0% | -5.8% | -25.9% | -58.0% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.06x | 0.08x | 141.98x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$46M | -$15M | $696M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $65M | $41M | $64M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $20M | $26M | $759M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -77.95x | 12.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $494 for SEER. Over the past 12 months, NAUT leads with a +311.5% total return vs SEER's +1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNA at 37.7% vs PACB's -48.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.8% | +12.0% | +3.3% | -10.3% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +311.5% | +45.2% | +1.6% | +46.0% | +81.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.0% | +161.1% | -47.2% | -86.5% | -27.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | -72.4% | -95.1% | -93.4% | -62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.4% | +385.1% | -96.7% | -81.3% | +0.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.6% | +37.7% | -19.2% | -48.7% | -10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDNA and SEER each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEER is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACB's 2.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs PACB's 60.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.39x | 0.84x | 2.43x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.31 | $23.24 | $2.41 | $2.73 | $155.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $10.96 | $1.65 | $0.85 | $73.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.8% | +92.3% | +78.0% | +60.4% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 56.4 | 49.8 | 60.2 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 315K | 667K | 401K | 5.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NAUT as "Buy", CDNA as "Buy", SEER as "Hold", PACB as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for CDNA (target: $24) vs -39.4% for PACB (target: $1).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $24.00 | — | $1.00 | $147.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 4 | 18 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.9% | +11.3% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CDNA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NAUT vs CDNA vs SEER vs PACB vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is the stronger pick with 13.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (NAUT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN?
On forward P/E, CareDx, Inc is actually cheaper at 22.
8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN?
Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) delivered a total return of -62. 8%, compared to -95. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNA returned +385. 1% versus SEER's -96. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seer, Inc.
(SEER) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. 's 2. 43β — meaning PACB is approximately 189% more volatile than SEER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is pulling ahead at 13.
8% versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -143. 0% for CareDx, Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEER leads at 29. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -620. 9% for Seer, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -717. 7% for SEER. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDNA leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) trades at 22.
8x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Illumina, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDNA: 11. 9% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NAUT or CDNA or SEER or PACB or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seer, Inc.
(SEER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEER: -96. 7%, PACB: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAUT and CDNA and SEER and PACB and ILMN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.