Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $772M | $2.35B | $88.45B | $24.47B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $317M | $867M | $12.64B | $10.89B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $169M | $3.30B | $382M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 54.9% | 72.1% | 61.9% | 38.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.4% | 25.3% | 38.7% | 17.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 10.9x | 19.3x | 6.9x | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $196M | $327M | $20.28B | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $326M | $185M | $837M | $599M | $102M |
NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NB Bancorp, Inc. Co… (NBBK) | 100 | 149.6 | +49.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 72.4 | -27.6% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 89.2 | -10.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 306.98x
- +18.4% vs FIS's -35.3%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs NBBK's 2.8%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs NBBK's 4.3%
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 225.3% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- 26.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.28 vs ICE's 2.18
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.28 vs 2.11
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.28 vs NBTB's 0.89
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs NBBK's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 21.3x), PEG 0.28 vs 2.11 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.4% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs NBBK's 0.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.5% |
NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • NBBK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 39.8x NBBK's $317M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $317M | $867M | $12.6B | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $76M | $241M | $6.5B | $3.8B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $169M | $3.3B | $382M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $225M | $4.3B | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.9% | +72.1% | +61.9% | +38.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +25.3% | +38.7% | +17.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +19.5% | +26.1% | +3.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +25.2% | +33.9% | +26.1% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.5% | +39.5% | +23.1% | +92.3% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $772M | $2.4B | $88.4B | $24.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $642M | $2.5B | $107.9B | $27.9B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.17x | 13.53x | 27.06x | 63.00x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.27x | 10.94x | 19.34x | 6.94x | 21.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | 3.05x | 2.58x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.96x | 10.35x | 16.71x | 7.66x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 2.71x | 7.00x | 2.29x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.21x | 3.08x | 1.76x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.45x | 10.75x | 20.62x | 9.97x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs NBBK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +9.5% | +11.6% | +2.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% | +2.3% | +1.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +7.9% | +7.5% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +2.4% | +9.5% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.17x | 0.70x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$129M | $142M | $19.4B | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $326M | $185M | $837M | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $196M | $327M | $20.3B | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 1.05x | 6.53x | 4.64x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBBK five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, NBBK leads with a +18.4% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTB at 15.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | +9.3% | -2.1% | -27.3% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.4% | +9.0% | -10.4% | -35.3% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.7% | +54.1% | +50.8% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.7% | +29.9% | +43.4% | -63.2% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.7% | +102.2% | +225.3% | -13.2% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.4% | +15.5% | +14.7% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.88x | 0.30x | 0.65x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.86 | $46.92 | $189.35 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.44 | $39.20 | $143.17 | $43.30 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +96.1% | +82.5% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 57.3 | 38.8 | 43.3 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 328K | 236K | 3.0M | 5.5M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBBK as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", ICE as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.1% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs NBBK's 0.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $46.00 | $195.71 | $67.14 | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 36 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +3.2% | +1.2% | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 14 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $1.43 | $1.93 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.0% | +0.4% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
ICE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NBBK vs NBTB vs ICE vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for NB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (NBBK). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (NBBK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, NB Bancorp, Inc.
Common Stock (NBBK) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +224. 7% versus FIS's -18. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning NBTB is approximately 314% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 4. 3% for NB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (NBBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 1% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 7% for NB Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock (NBBK).
09Is NBBK or NBTB or ICE or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 1. 2% yield, +224. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +224. 7%, NBTB: +104. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBBK and NBTB and ICE and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (NBBK (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NBBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.