Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $346M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $18.71B | $67.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $4.97B | $37.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $201M | $-2.15B |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 44.2% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.7% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 2.1% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 16.5x | 57.5x | 93.5x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $872M | $32.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $1.59B | $4.57B |
NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National CineMedia,… (NCMI) | 100 | 13.5 | -86.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Roku, Inc. (ROKU) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 3.3%
- Beta 1.26, yield 3.3%, current ratio 2.42x
- 3.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs ROKU's 439.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
- 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 93.5x)
ROKU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth 166.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.9%
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NCMI's -25.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 93.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs ROKU's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NCMI's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5% |
NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
NCMI leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • ROKU leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 399.9x NCMI's $243M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, ROKU holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $5.0B | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $30.1B | $20.5B | $223M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $11.0B | $11.2B | $201M | -$2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $653M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +44.2% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +2.1% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +4.1% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +13.1% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +22.4% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +31.1% | -29.8% | +4.0% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NCMI and DIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 93% valuation discount to ROKU's 214.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ROKU's 53.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $346M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $18.7B | $68.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $293M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $18.0B | $96.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.73x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 214.69x | 93.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 16.53x | 57.52x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.23x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 53.71x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 3.95x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 7.19x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 123.60x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 39.10x | 22.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. NCMI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +7.6% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +4.6% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | +29.8% | +6.9% | -0.3% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | +30.5% | +8.5% | -0.2% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.33x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$53M | $5.4B | $39.2B | -$715M | $28.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $1.6B | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $872M | $32.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.17x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 129.08x | 3.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,475 for NCMI. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NCMI's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs DIS's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -3.0% | -2.8% | +16.5% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.3% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +111.5% | +216.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +127.4% | +101.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.3% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -60.0% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +439.0% | -3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +31.5% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and ROKU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROKU's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROKU currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 2.10x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.56 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $129.80 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.92 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $59.45 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.7% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +97.6% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 72.7 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 472K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 2.7M | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NCMI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NCMI as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", ROKU as "Buy", WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 102.2% upside for NCMI (target: $8) vs 10.4% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, NCMI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.26% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $142.19 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 99 | 63 | 45 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — | +0.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — | $1.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCMI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
NCMI vs NFLX vs DIS vs ROKU vs WBD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Roku, Inc. at 214. 7x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -85. 3% for National CineMedia, Inc. (NCMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus NCMI's -71. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Roku, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ROKU is approximately 439% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National CineMedia, Inc. (NCMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roku, Inc. grew EPS 166. 3% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROKU leads at 14. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -4. 4% for National CineMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -5. 7% for NCMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Roku, Inc. — 41. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCMI: 102. 2% to $7. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD?
In this comparison, NCMI (3.
3% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX, ROKU, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCMI or NFLX or DIS or ROKU or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Roku, Inc. (ROKU) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, ROKU: +439. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCMI and NFLX and DIS and ROKU and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NCMI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ROKU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NCMI, DIS pay a dividend while NFLX, ROKU, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 18%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 11%
- Gross Margin > 26%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.