Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $3M | $18.24B | $7.27B | $32.89B | $7.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $869K | $7.41B | $11.68B | $26.90B | $7.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $1.76B | $1.22B | $2.27B | $369M |
| Gross Margin | 95.4% | 40.4% | 16.5% | 31.1% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9.5% | 35.7% | 9.9% | 13.4% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.8x | 15.9x | 11.7x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $3.95B | $760M | $12.93B | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289K | $1.98B | $277M | $700M | $291M |
NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netcapital Inc. (NCPL) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| CF Industries Holdi… (CF) | 100 | 391.6 | +291.6% |
| The Mosaic Company (MOS) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
| Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) | 100 | 201.0 | +101.0% |
| ICL Group Ltd (ICL) | 100 | 184.1 | +84.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCPL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 338.1% 10Y total return vs ICL's 98.7%
- PEG 0.18 vs MOS's 0.92
- 19.3% revenue growth vs NCPL's -82.4%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 16.6x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.29
MOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.52 vs NCPL's 1.82, lower leverage
NTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 248.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.3%
Among these 5 stocks, ICL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.3% revenue growth vs NCPL's -82.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 16.6x), PEG 0.18 vs 0.29 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.7% margin vs NCPL's -32.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs NCPL's 1.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NTR's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.6% vs NCPL's -79.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs NCPL's -111.6%, ROIC 18.7% vs -21.4% |
NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CF leads in 5 of 6 categories
NCPL leads 0 • MOS leads 0 • NTR leads 0 • ICL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.9B annually — 30939.3x NCPL's $869,460. CF is the more profitable business, keeping 23.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCPL's -32.6%. On growth, CF holds the edge at +19.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $869,460 | $7.4B | $11.7B | $26.9B | $7.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $3.5B | $2.2B | $6.0B | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $1.8B | $1.2B | $2.3B | $369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $1.6B | -$535M | $2.0B | $317M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.4% | +40.4% | +16.5% | +31.1% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +35.7% | +9.9% | +13.4% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | +23.7% | +10.5% | +8.4% | +5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +21.9% | -4.6% | +7.4% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.4% | -7.5% | +6.8% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.6% | +115.1% | +3.8% | +4.2% | -1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, MOS trades at a 82% valuation discount to ICL's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CF offers better value at 0.30x vs ICL's 0.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $18.2B | $7.3B | $32.9B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $20.2B | $7.8B | $45.1B | $10.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 13.24x | 5.90x | 14.42x | 33.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.79x | 15.89x | 11.72x | 16.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x | 0.34x | 0.35x | 0.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.19x | 3.59x | 7.08x | 7.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.44x | 2.57x | 0.62x | 1.20x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 2.48x | 0.55x | 1.31x | 1.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.12x | — | 16.15x | 59.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CF delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-139 for NCPL. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CF scores 8/9 vs NCPL's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -138.8% | +22.3% | +10.0% | +9.1% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -111.6% | +12.4% | +5.0% | +4.3% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.4% | +18.7% | +6.1% | +8.0% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.8% | +18.3% | +5.9% | +9.8% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.51x | 0.06x | 0.51x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $2.0B | $483M | $12.2B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289,428 | $2.0B | $277M | $700M | $291M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $3.9B | $760M | $12.9B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1476.28x | 16.31x | 8.81x | 5.44x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CF five years ago would be worth $23,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for NCPL. Over the past 12 months, CF leads with a +49.6% total return vs NCPL's -79.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CF at 22.6% vs NCPL's -84.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.1% | +48.8% | -7.6% | +9.1% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -79.4% | +49.6% | -24.6% | +24.6% | -9.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +84.1% | -32.7% | +16.0% | +7.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +130.9% | -27.9% | +28.1% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +338.1% | +14.9% | +54.0% | +98.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.9% | +22.6% | -12.4% | +5.1% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CF is the less volatile stock with a -0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCPL's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CF currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs NCPL's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | -0.69x | 0.51x | -0.08x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.75 | $141.96 | $38.23 | $85.36 | $7.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $75.42 | $22.74 | $53.03 | $4.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.4% | +83.6% | +59.9% | +80.1% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.4 | 47.0 | 42.7 | 48.9 | 61.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 186K | 4.9M | 9.5M | 3.8M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MOS and NTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CF as "Buy", MOS as "Hold", NTR as "Buy", ICL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.4% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs -8.3% for CF (target: $109). For income investors, MOS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.15% vs CF's 1.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $108.89 | $31.25 | $85.40 | $6.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 | 49 | 33 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +4.2% | +3.2% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.01 | $0.95 | $2.22 | $0.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
CF leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
NCPL vs CF vs MOS vs NTR vs ICL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -82. 4% for Netcapital Inc. (NCPL). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL?
On trailing P/E, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus ICL Group Ltd at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CF Industries Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 92x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL?
Over the past 5 years, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Netcapital Inc. (NCPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CF returned +325. 8% versus NCPL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 69β versus Netcapital Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning NCPL is approximately -354% more volatile than CF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 51% for Nutrien Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus -82. 4% for Netcapital Inc. (NCPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for ICL Group Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTR leads at -10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL?
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus -32. 6% for Netcapital Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CF leads at 33. 4% versus -952. 4% for NCPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCPL leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 92x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for ICL Group Ltd — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 36. 4% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL?
In this comparison, MOS (4.
2% yield), NTR (3. 2% yield), ICL (2. 9% yield), CF (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NCPL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCPL or CF or MOS or NTR or ICL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 69), 1. 7% yield, +325. 8% 10Y return). Netcapital Inc. (NCPL) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CF: +325. 8%, NCPL: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCPL and CF and MOS and NTR and ICL?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCPL (Financial Services) and CF (Basic Materials) and MOS (Basic Materials) and NTR (Basic Materials) and ICL (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NCPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ICL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CF, MOS, NTR, ICL pay a dividend while NCPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.