Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NDLS
Noodles & Company

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-74.4%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$201.63B
5Y Perf.+52.2%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.+24.7%
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$266M
5Y Perf.-79.3%

NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NDLS logoNDLS
MCD logoMCD
SHAK logoSHAK
JACK logoJACK
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$71M$201.63B$2.79B$266M
Revenue (TTM)$495M$27.45B$1.49B$1.35B
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$8.68B$41M$-69M
Gross Margin10.0%44.1%7.5%27.6%
Operating Margin0.1%46.3%4.3%-2.8%
Forward P/E21.5x50.2x4.0x
Total Debt$264M$54.81B$902M$3.12B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$774M$360M$52M

NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NDLS
MCD
SHAK
JACK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Noodles & Company (NDLS)10025.6-74.4%
McDonald's Corporat… (MCD)100152.2+52.2%
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)100124.7+24.7%
Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK)10020.7-79.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Noodles & Company is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. SHAK and JACK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NDLS
Noodles & Company
The Momentum Pick

NDLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +48.5% vs JACK's -47.8%
Best for: momentum
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
The Income Pick

MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.5%
  • 157.7% 10Y total return vs SHAK's 98.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 0.95x
  • Beta 0.11, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.95x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Growth Play

SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7%
Best for: growth exposure
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
The Value Play

JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (4.0x vs 50.2x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHAK logoSHAK15.4% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7%
ValueJACK logoJACKLower P/E (4.0x vs 50.2x)
Quality / MarginsMCD logoMCD31.6% margin vs NDLS's -7.5%
Stability / SafetyMCD logoMCDBeta 0.11 vs SHAK's 1.75
DividendsMCD logoMCD2.5% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs JACK's 6.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NDLS logoNDLS+48.5% vs JACK's -47.8%
Efficiency (ROA)MCD logoMCD14.5% ROA vs NDLS's -13.6%, ROIC 18.7% vs -1.5%

NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NDLSNoodles & Company
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
98.0%$485M
Franchise
2.0%$10M
MCDMcDonald's Corporation
FY 2025
High-Growth Markets
50.7%$13.6B
UNITED STATES
40.3%$10.8B
International Developmental Licensed Markets and Corporate
9.0%$2.4B
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M
JACKJack in the Box Inc.
FY 2025
Restaurant Sales
42.8%$627M
Franchise
25.2%$369M
Royalty
15.2%$222M
Advertising
14.8%$217M
Technology Service
1.4%$20M
Franchise Fees
0.7%$11M

NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCDLAGGINGSHAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 55.4x NDLS's $495M. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NDLS's -7.5%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyMCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$495M$27.4B$1.5B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$14.4B$173M$16M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M$8.7B$41M-$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$7.2B$16M-$10M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+44.1%+7.5%+27.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.1%+46.3%+4.3%-2.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.5%+31.6%+2.8%-5.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.5%+26.2%+1.1%-0.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.0%+9.4%+14.3%-25.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+63.7%+6.9%-110.0%+33.7%
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JACK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 23.7x trailing earnings, MCD trades at a 63% valuation discount to SHAK's 63.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NDLS's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JACK's 82.9x.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyMCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
Market CapShares × price$71M$201.6B$2.8B$266M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$333M$255.7B$3.3B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.63x23.74x63.53x-3.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.51x50.21x4.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.74x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.18x17.57x17.31x82.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.14x7.50x1.93x0.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.06x49.34x3.58x
JACK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs NDLS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyMCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.6%+14.5%+2.2%-2.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.5%+18.7%+6.0%-0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.2%+23.3%+5.4%-0.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93774
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$263M$54.0B$542M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$774M$360M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$264M$54.8B$902M$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.12x6.09x16.87x-0.51x
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NDLS and MCD and SHAK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MCD five years ago would be worth $13,427 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,238 for NDLS. Over the past 12 months, NDLS leads with a +48.5% total return vs JACK's -47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHAK at 1.1% vs JACK's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyMCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+102.4%-5.8%-17.0%-25.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+48.5%-8.6%-32.1%-47.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.5%+2.5%+3.5%-81.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.6%+34.3%-22.6%-82.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.3%+157.7%+98.2%-59.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-31.9%+0.8%+1.1%-42.7%
Evenly matched — NDLS and MCD and SHAK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NDLS and MCD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NDLS currently trades 86.0% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyMCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.59x0.11x1.75x1.69x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.95$341.75$144.65$29.40
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.77$282.15$67.20$8.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.0%+83.0%+47.9%+47.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.430.948.058.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded91K3.0M1.5M837K
Evenly matched — NDLS and MCD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MCD and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NDLS as "Hold", MCD as "Buy", SHAK as "Hold", JACK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 300.0% upside for NDLS (target: $48) vs 24.2% for MCD (target: $352). For income investors, JACK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.25% vs MCD's 2.52%.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyMCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.00$352.25$120.89$19.92
# AnalystsCovering analysts18623541
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+6.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2700
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$7.14$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%0.0%+1.9%
Evenly matched — MCD and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallMcDonald's Corporation (MCD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NDLS vs MCD vs SHAK vs JACK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK?

On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 23.

7x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 63. 5x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK?

Over the past 5 years, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) delivered a total return of +34.

3%, compared to -87. 6% for Noodles & Company (NDLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +157. 7% versus NDLS's -86. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

11β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning SHAK is approximately 1472% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK?

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus -8. 6% for Noodles & Company — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc.

(JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 2x for Shake Shack Inc. — 46. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDLS: 300. 0% to $48. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK?

In this comparison, JACK (6.

3% yield), MCD (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NDLS, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NDLS or MCD or SHAK or JACK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

11), 2. 5% yield, +157. 7% 10Y return). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +157. 7%, SHAK: +98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NDLS and MCD and SHAK and JACK?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NDLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MCD, JACK pay a dividend while NDLS, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NDLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JACK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NDLS and MCD and SHAK and JACK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NDLS: -0.0% · MCD: 9.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.