Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $71M | $2.79B | $6.81B | $9.82B | $315M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $495M | $1.49B | $1.75B | $848M | $738M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $41M | $81M | $38M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 10.0% | 7.5% | 25.3% | 67.4% | 29.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 4.3% | 9.4% | 4.7% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 50.2x | 60.3x | 161.5x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $264M | $902M | $1.09B | $466M | $999M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $360M | $269M | $283M | $20M |
NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noodles & Company (NDLS) | 100 | 44.4 | -55.6% |
| Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) | 100 | 89.1 | -10.9% |
| Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) | 100 | 188.3 | +88.3% |
| CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) | 100 | 19.4 | -80.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NDLS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.59 vs CAVA's 1.83
- +48.5% vs PTLO's -61.4%
SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, current ratio 1.76x
- Beta 1.75, current ratio 1.76x
BROS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.83
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 103.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.4%
- 27.9% revenue growth vs CAVA's -12.0%
- 4.6% margin vs NDLS's -7.5%
CAVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 93.1% 10Y total return vs SHAK's 98.2%
- 2.8% ROA vs NDLS's -13.6%, ROIC 5.0% vs -1.5%
PTLO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (20.3x vs 161.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% revenue growth vs CAVA's -12.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 161.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs NDLS's -7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs CAVA's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.5% vs PTLO's -61.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs NDLS's -13.6%, ROIC 5.0% vs -1.5% |
NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BROS leads in 2 of 6 categories
NDLS leads 2 • CAVA leads 1 • SHAK leads 0 • PTLO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BROS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 3.5x NDLS's $495M. BROS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NDLS's -7.5%. On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $495M | $1.5B | $1.7B | $848M | $738M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $173M | $244M | $113M | $75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $41M | $81M | $38M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $16M | $148M | $26M | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +7.5% | +25.3% | +67.4% | +29.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +4.3% | +9.4% | +4.7% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +2.8% | +4.6% | +4.5% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +1.1% | +8.5% | +3.1% | -1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | +14.3% | +30.8% | -125.0% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.7% | -110.0% | 0.0% | -127.3% | -111.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NDLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, PTLO trades at a 90% valuation discount to CAVA's 156.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NDLS's 15.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAVA's 77.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $2.8B | $6.8B | $9.8B | $315M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $333M | $3.3B | $7.6B | $10.0B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.63x | 63.53x | 85.05x | 156.52x | 16.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 50.21x | 60.32x | 161.48x | 20.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.18x | 17.31x | 27.60x | 77.54x | 16.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.93x | 4.16x | 11.58x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.23x | 7.50x | 12.79x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.34x | 125.12x | 375.47x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BROS and CAVA each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BROS delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for PTLO. CAVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTLO's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs PTLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.6% | +9.2% | +4.9% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.6% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +2.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.5% | +6.0% | +7.7% | +5.0% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.2% | +5.4% | +6.4% | +4.9% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.63x | 1.21x | 0.60x | 2.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $263M | $542M | $820M | $183M | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $360M | $269M | $283M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $264M | $902M | $1.1B | $466M | $999M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.12x | 16.87x | 11.85x | — | 1.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAVA five years ago would be worth $19,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,238 for NDLS. Over the past 12 months, NDLS leads with a +48.5% total return vs PTLO's -61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAVA at 24.5% vs PTLO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +102.4% | -17.0% | -13.8% | +39.6% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.5% | -32.1% | -9.5% | -9.9% | -61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | +3.5% | +66.0% | +93.1% | -78.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -22.6% | +46.1% | +93.1% | -85.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | +98.2% | +46.1% | +93.1% | -85.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.9% | +1.1% | +18.4% | +24.5% | -40.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NDLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NDLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAVA's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NDLS currently trades 86.0% from its 52-week high vs PTLO's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 1.75x | 1.83x | 1.83x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.95 | $144.65 | $77.88 | $101.50 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $67.20 | $44.58 | $43.41 | $4.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.0% | +47.9% | +68.8% | +83.3% | +32.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 48.0 | 62.8 | 50.9 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 91K | 1.5M | 4.1M | 2.8M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BROS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NDLS as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold", BROS as "Buy", CAVA as "Buy", PTLO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 300.0% upside for NDLS (target: $48) vs -2.2% for CAVA (target: $83).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.00 | $120.89 | $74.45 | $82.63 | $6.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 35 | 21 | 23 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BROS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). NDLS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
NDLS vs SHAK vs BROS vs CAVA vs PTLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO?
On trailing P/E, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the cheapest at 16. 1x versus CAVA Group, Inc. at 156. 5x. On forward P/E, Portillo's Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO?
Over the past 5 years, CAVA Group, Inc.
(CAVA) delivered a total return of +93. 1%, compared to -87. 6% for Noodles & Company (NDLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHAK returned +98. 2% versus NDLS's -86. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Noodles & Company (NDLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
59β versus CAVA Group, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning CAVA is approximately 210% more volatile than NDLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 2% for Portillo's Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.
(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 9% for CAVA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO?
CAVA Group, Inc.
(CAVA) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -8. 6% for Noodles & Company — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BROS leads at 9. 8% versus -1. 0% for NDLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAVA leads at 67. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 161. 5x for CAVA Group, Inc. — 141. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDLS: 300. 0% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NDLS or SHAK or BROS or CAVA or PTLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Noodles & Company (NDLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
59)). Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NDLS: -86. 3%, BROS: +46. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NDLS and SHAK and BROS and CAVA and PTLO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NDLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTLO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.