NEOV
NeoVolta Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$90M
5Y Perf.-52.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
Solar
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-76.6%
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$15.65B
5Y Perf.+9.3%
STEM
Stem, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NEOV | SHLS | GNRC | STEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Industrial - Machinery | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $90M | $1.32B | $15.65B | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $536M | $4.33B | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $34M | $189M | $144M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 33.5% | 38.1% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | -45.0% | 11.2% | 7.5% | -35.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.4x | 30.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $175M | $1.33B | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $795K | $7M | $341M | $49M |
NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NEOV
SHLS
GNRC
STEM
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NeoVolta Inc. (NEOV) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 23.4 | -76.6% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 109.3 | +9.3% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NEOV and STEM are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Stem, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SHLS and GNRC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NEOV
NeoVolta Inc.
The Growth Play
NEOV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 218.6%, EPS growth -116.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 218.6% revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0%
- Beta 1.55 vs STEM's 3.66
Best for: growth exposure
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 30.9x)
Best for: income & stability
GNRC
Generac Holdings Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs NEOV's 92.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 50.5%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.69, yield 0.0%, current ratio 2.03x
- +129.9% vs NEOV's -22.3%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
STEM
Stem, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 94.2% margin vs NEOV's -54.7%
- 43.2% ROA vs NEOV's -97.7%, ROIC -57.1% vs -79.9%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NEOV | 218.6% revenue growth vs GNRC's -2.0% |
| Value | SHLS | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 30.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | STEM | 94.2% margin vs NEOV's -54.7% |
| Stability / Safety | NEOV | Beta 1.55 vs STEM's 3.66 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GNRC | +129.9% vs NEOV's -22.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STEM | 43.2% ROA vs NEOV's -97.7%, ROIC -57.1% vs -79.9% |
NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSHLSLAGGINGSTEM
Who Leads Where
GNRC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHLS leads 2 • NEOV leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓STEMStem, Inc.
0leads
NEOVNeoVolta Inc.
0leads
GNRCGenerac Holdings Inc.
2leads
SHLSShoals Technologies G…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GNRCvs NEOVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GNRC3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SHLS3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GNRC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SHLS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 239.5x NEOV's $18M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEOV's -54.7%. On growth, NEOV holds the edge at +3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | SHLSShoals Technologi… | GNRCGenerac Holdings … | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $536M | $4.3B | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $73M | $472M | -$16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $34M | $189M | $144M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$77M | $419M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +33.5% | +38.1% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -45.0% | +11.2% | +7.5% | -35.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | +6.3% | +4.4% | +94.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.8% | -14.5% | +9.7% | -5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +74.9% | +12.4% | -10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | — | +69.9% | +27.2% |
GNRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.2x trailing earnings, SHLS trades at a 60% valuation discount to GNRC's 99.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHLS's 22.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNRC's 34.4x.
| Metric | NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | SHLSShoals Technologi… | GNRCGenerac Holdings … | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $1.3B | $15.7B | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $92M | $1.5B | $16.6B | $394M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.53x | 39.20x | 99.17x | -0.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.40x | 30.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.83x | 34.39x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.65x | 2.77x | 3.72x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.63x | 2.20x | 5.99x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 58.38x | 10.82x |
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GNRC and STEM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GNRC delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-198 for NEOV. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEOV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GNRC scores 6/9 vs NEOV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | SHLSShoals Technologi… | GNRCGenerac Holdings … | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -197.5% | +5.7% | +7.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.7% | +3.7% | +3.4% | +43.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -79.9% | +5.9% | +5.9% | -57.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -119.6% | +7.6% | +6.9% | -23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 0.29x | 0.51x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $168M | $992M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $794,836 | $7M | $341M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $175M | $1.3B | $369M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.14x | 5.91x | 4.54x | 14.43x |
Evenly matched — GNRC and STEM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GNRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GNRC five years ago would be worth $8,149 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $217 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, GNRC leads with a +129.9% total return vs NEOV's -22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GNRC at 34.2% vs STEM's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | SHLSShoals Technologi… | GNRCGenerac Holdings … | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.6% | -13.8% | +89.1% | -48.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.3% | +66.5% | +129.9% | -16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.4% | -60.2% | +141.5% | -89.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.1% | -72.8% | -18.5% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.2% | -74.7% | +666.1% | -95.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | -26.5% | +34.2% | -52.9% |
GNRC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEOV and GNRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEOV is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | SHLSShoals Technologi… | GNRCGenerac Holdings … | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 2.23x | 1.69x | 3.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.13 | $11.36 | $269.58 | $32.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.39 | $3.81 | $113.96 | $5.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.8% | +69.0% | +99.0% | +27.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 63.2 | 77.8 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 522K | 5.1M | 895K | 155K |
Evenly matched — NEOV and GNRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NEOV as "Hold", SHLS as "Buy", GNRC as "Buy", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 137.2% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs 1.7% for GNRC (target: $271).
| Metric | NEOVNeoVolta Inc. | SHLSShoals Technologi… | GNRCGenerac Holdings … | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.83 | $271.22 | $20.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 23 | 39 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GNRC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SHLS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallShoals Technologies Group, … (SHLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NEOV vs SHLS vs GNRC vs STEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NeoVolta Inc.
(NEOV) is the stronger pick with 218. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 39. 2x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM?
On trailing P/E, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the cheapest at 39. 2x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 99. 2x. On forward P/E, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM?
Over the past 5 years, Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) delivered a total return of -18. 5%, compared to -97. 8% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus STEM's -95. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NeoVolta Inc.
(NEOV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 60β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 78β — meaning STEM is approximately 136% more volatile than NEOV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 107% for NeoVolta Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NeoVolta Inc.
(NEOV) is pulling ahead at 218. 6% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -116. 5% for NeoVolta Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEOV leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -59. 7% for NeoVolta Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -56. 0% for NEOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 137. 2% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NEOV or SHLS or GNRC or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Generac Holdings Inc.
(GNRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+666. 1% 10Y return). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNRC: +666. 1%, STEM: -95. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEOV and SHLS and GNRC and STEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEOV (Industrials) and SHLS (Energy) and GNRC (Industrials) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEOV is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NEOV: 333.5% · SHLS: 74.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.