NEXA vs CDE

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Coeur Mining, Inc. at 20. 1x. On forward P/E, Nexa Resources S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) delivered a total return of +96. 0%, compared to +40. 8% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDE returned +149. 9% versus NEXA's -6. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 52β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 19% more volatile than NEXA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 142% for Nexa Resources S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 8. 2% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coeur Mining, Inc. grew EPS 500. 0% year-over-year, compared to 164. 5% for Nexa Resources S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 4. 4% for Nexa Resources S. A. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDE leads at 36. 3% versus 13. 7% for NEXA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDE leads at 39. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 9. 1x for Coeur Mining, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

In this comparison, NEXA (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. CDE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 9% yield). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEXA: -6. 0%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NEXA is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEXA pays a dividend while CDE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.