Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $372.42B | $179.96B | $96.42B | $73.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.18B | $95.72B | $125.28B | $37.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10.98B | $12.25B | $18.60B | $485M |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | 37.3% | 61.7% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 14.2% | 15.3% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.7x | 15.3x | 7.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $14.46B | $44.88B | $110.44B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.03B | $5.70B | $9.48B | $5.31B |
NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 209.4 | +109.4% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 85.7 | -14.3% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.3 | +25.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 16.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -4.8%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Better valuation composite
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +225.5% vs NFLX's -22.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -4.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +225.5% vs NFLX's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's 0.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -9.7% |
NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • DIS leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 3.3x WBD's $37.9B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's 1.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45.2B | $95.7B | $125.3B | $37.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30.1B | $19.0B | $35.4B | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.0B | $12.3B | $18.6B | $485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.5B | $7.1B | $18.1B | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.5% | +37.3% | +61.7% | +44.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +14.2% | +15.3% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +12.8% | +14.8% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +7.4% | +14.5% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +5.2% | +5.3% | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.1% | -4.3% | -32.6% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 86% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $372.4B | $180.0B | $96.4B | $73.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $377.8B | $219.1B | $197.4B | $108.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.74x | 14.67x | 4.91x | -5.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.69x | 15.27x | 7.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.05x | — | 0.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.56x | 11.44x | 5.35x | 9.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.24x | 1.91x | 0.78x | 1.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.26x | 1.59x | 0.99x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.36x | 17.86x | 4.40x | 16.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs WBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.3% | +10.7% | +19.5% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.8% | +6.1% | +6.9% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.8% | +6.9% | +8.2% | -9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.5% | +8.5% | +8.9% | -10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $39.2B | $101.0B | $34.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.0B | $5.7B | $9.5B | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $44.9B | $110.4B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.33x | 7.86x | 6.84x | 1.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,674 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +225.5% total return vs NFLX's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 39.6% vs CMCSA's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | -10.2% | -8.2% | -4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.5% | +10.4% | -19.4% | +225.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.3% | +2.4% | -25.6% | +111.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | -43.3% | -43.1% | -25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +883.1% | +4.4% | +16.8% | -1.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.6% | +0.8% | -9.4% | +28.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMCSA and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.21x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.12 | $124.69 | $36.66 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.01 | $89.61 | $25.75 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +80.6% | +72.2% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 48.3 | 41.0 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44.8M | 8.9M | 28.4M | 22.5M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 9.9% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.09% vs DIS's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.29 | $139.50 | $31.87 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 99 | 63 | 60 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +5.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 18 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $1.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +1.9% | +7.4% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NFLX vs DIS vs CMCSA vs WBD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +77. 2%, compared to -43. 3% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +883. 1% versus WBD's -1. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 331% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -4. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -260. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 47. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -28. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -25. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 7x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 38. 8% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), DIS (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NFLX or DIS or CMCSA or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +16. 8%, WBD: -1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NFLX and DIS and CMCSA and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.