Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Specialty Retail
NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $372.42B | $179.96B | $73.77B | $96.42B | $2.94T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.18B | $95.72B | $37.86B | $125.28B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10.98B | $12.25B | $485M | $18.60B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | 37.3% | 44.0% | 61.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.5% | 14.2% | 1.5% | 15.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.7x | 15.3x | — | 7.5x | 35.1x |
| Total Debt | $14.46B | $44.88B | $39.51B | $110.44B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.03B | $5.70B | $5.31B | $9.48B | $86.81B |
NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 209.4 | +109.4% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 85.7 | -14.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.3 | +25.3% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -4.8%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WBD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +225.5% vs NFLX's -22.5%
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs AMZN's 1.25
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 35.1x), PEG 0.40 vs 1.25
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 35.1x), PEG 0.40 vs 1.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +225.5% vs NFLX's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's 0.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -9.7% |
NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • DIS leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 19.6x WBD's $37.9B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's 1.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45.2B | $95.7B | $37.9B | $125.3B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $30.1B | $19.0B | $16.4B | $35.4B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.0B | $12.3B | $485M | $18.6B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.5B | $7.1B | $4.1B | $18.1B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.5% | +37.3% | +44.0% | +61.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +14.2% | +1.5% | +15.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +12.8% | +1.3% | +14.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +7.4% | +10.9% | +14.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +5.2% | -6.0% | +5.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.1% | -4.3% | -2.1% | -32.6% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 87% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs AMZN's 1.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $372.4B | $180.0B | $73.8B | $96.4B | $2.94T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $377.8B | $219.1B | $108.0B | $197.4B | $3.01T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.74x | 14.67x | -5.90x | 4.91x | 38.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.69x | 15.27x | — | 7.50x | 35.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.05x | — | — | 0.26x | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.56x | 11.44x | 9.86x | 5.35x | 20.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.24x | 1.91x | 1.88x | 0.78x | 4.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.26x | 1.59x | 1.91x | 0.99x | 7.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.36x | 17.86x | 16.66x | 4.40x | 382.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBD. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs WBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.3% | +10.7% | +1.3% | +19.5% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.8% | +6.1% | +0.5% | +6.9% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.8% | +6.9% | -9.7% | +8.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.5% | +8.5% | -10.2% | +8.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.13x | 1.13x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $39.2B | $34.2B | $101.0B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.0B | $5.7B | $5.3B | $9.5B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $44.9B | $39.5B | $110.4B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.33x | 7.86x | 1.85x | 6.84x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,674 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +225.5% total return vs NFLX's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 39.6% vs CMCSA's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.4% | -10.2% | -4.4% | -8.2% | +20.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.5% | +10.4% | +225.5% | -19.4% | +46.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.3% | +2.4% | +111.3% | -25.6% | +158.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | -43.3% | -25.7% | -43.1% | +67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +883.1% | +4.4% | -1.8% | +16.8% | +730.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.6% | +0.8% | +28.3% | -9.4% | +37.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMCSA and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.90x | 0.21x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.12 | $124.69 | $30.00 | $36.66 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.01 | $89.61 | $8.06 | $25.75 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +80.6% | +90.8% | +72.2% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 48.3 | 41.2 | 41.0 | 79.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44.8M | 8.9M | 22.5M | 28.4M | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", CMCSA as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 9.9% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.09% vs DIS's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.29 | $139.50 | $29.94 | $31.87 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 99 | 63 | 32 | 60 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — | +5.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 18 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | — | $1.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +1.9% | 0.0% | +7.4% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +77. 2%, compared to -43. 3% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +883. 1% versus WBD's -1. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 622% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -4. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -260. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 47. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -28. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -25. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 27. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 38. 8% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), DIS (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX, WBD, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +16. 8%, AMZN: +730. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NFLX and DIS and WBD and CMCSA and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and WBD (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while NFLX, WBD, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.