Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $22.54B | $5.35B | $30.09B | $5.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.82B | $2.32B | $4.88B | $2.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $962M | $273M | $1.35B | $358M |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 68.0% | 32.9% | 73.3% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 20.1% | 35.9% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 17.7x | 21.9x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $16.24B | $3.39B | $9.30B | $5.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $136M | $34M | $204M | $6M |
NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiSource Inc. (NI) | 100 | 197.3 | +97.3% |
| ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) | 100 | 101.6 | +1.6% |
| Atmos Energy Corpor… (ATO) | 100 | 176.9 | +76.9% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.8%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 0.69x
- 21.8% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5%
- +19.0% vs OGS's +8.1%
OGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ATO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 179.6% 10Y total return vs NI's 137.6%
- 27.6% margin vs OGS's 11.8%
- 1.9% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6%
- 4.5% ROA vs NI's 2.7%, ROIC 5.5% vs 5.3%
SR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.6%
- PEG 0.66 vs OGS's 5.07
- Beta 0.06, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.32x
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.9x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.48
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.8% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 21.9x), PEG 0.66 vs 2.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.6% margin vs OGS's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs NI's 0.22 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 28-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.0% vs OGS's +8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs NI's 2.7%, ROIC 5.5% vs 5.3% |
NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories
NI leads 1 • OGS leads 0 • ATO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ATO and SR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NI is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 2.9x OGS's $2.3B. ATO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OGS's 11.8%. On growth, NI holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $2.3B | $4.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.1B | $779M | $2.5B | $864M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $962M | $273M | $1.3B | $358M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.0B | -$219M | -$2.0B | -$2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +68.0% | +32.9% | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +20.1% | +35.9% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +11.8% | +27.6% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | -9.4% | -40.8% | -108.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | -11.1% | +0.6% | -9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +3.0% | +14.5% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, OGS trades at a 20% valuation discount to ATO's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs OGS's 5.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.5B | $5.4B | $30.1B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38.6B | $8.7B | $39.2B | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.11x | 19.52x | 24.38x | 19.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.85x | 17.73x | 21.88x | 16.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.58x | 2.77x | 0.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.87x | 11.25x | 17.08x | 12.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 2.21x | 6.40x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.91x | 1.50x | 2.15x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — OGS and ATO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SR delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for ATO. ATO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SR's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NI scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +8.2% | +7.7% | +10.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +3.1% | +4.5% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +5.2% | +5.5% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +6.2% | +6.1% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 0.99x | 0.69x | 1.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.1B | $3.4B | $9.1B | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $136M | $34M | $204M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.2B | $3.4B | $9.3B | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.87x | 3.25x | 9.61x | 2.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NI five years ago would be worth $20,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,516 for OGS. Over the past 12 months, NI leads with a +19.0% total return vs OGS's +8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NI at 20.9% vs OGS's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | +11.0% | +8.0% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.0% | +8.1% | +14.1% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.8% | +15.9% | +62.9% | +38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.8% | +25.2% | +91.7% | +32.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.6% | +76.9% | +179.6% | +71.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +5.0% | +17.7% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NI and ATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATO is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NI's 0.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NI currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs SR's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | -0.00x | -0.00x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.98 | $90.78 | $192.51 | $95.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.22 | $70.87 | $149.98 | $69.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +94.0% | +94.5% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 42.1 | 46.0 | 34.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 439K | 854K | 346K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ATO and SR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NI as "Buy", OGS as "Hold", ATO as "Hold", SR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for SR (target: $97) vs -1.6% for ATO (target: $179). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs ATO's 1.90%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.80 | $89.60 | $179.00 | $97.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 14 | 20 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.1% | +1.9% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 12 | 28 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.12 | $2.66 | $3.45 | $3.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
NI vs OGS vs ATO vs SR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NI or OGS or ATO or SR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NiSource Inc.
(NI) is the stronger pick with 21. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NiSource Inc. (NI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NI or OGS or ATO or SR?
On trailing P/E, ONE Gas, Inc.
(OGS) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus Atmos Energy Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Spire Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus ONE Gas, Inc. 's 5. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NI or OGS or ATO or SR?
Over the past 5 years, NiSource Inc.
(NI) delivered a total return of +100. 8%, compared to +25. 2% for ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATO returned +179. 6% versus SR's +71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NI or OGS or ATO or SR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
00β versus NiSource Inc. 's 0. 22β — meaning NI is approximately -6488% more volatile than ATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 154% for Spire Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NI or OGS or ATO or SR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NiSource Inc.
(NI) is pulling ahead at 21. 8% versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NiSource Inc. grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NI leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NI or OGS or ATO or SR?
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
5% net margin versus 10. 9% for ONE Gas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATO leads at 33. 2% versus 18. 8% for OGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NI or OGS or ATO or SR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus ONE Gas, Inc. 's 5. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Spire Inc. (SR) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for NiSource Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 13. 4% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NI or OGS or ATO or SR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 9% for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO).
09Is NI or OGS or ATO or SR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
00), 1. 9% yield, +179. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATO: +179. 6%, NI: +137. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NI and OGS and ATO and SR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.