Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Security & Protection Services
Entertainment
NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Security & Protection Services | Security & Protection Services | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $18M | $10M | $4.44B | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $72M | $5.39B | $17M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-24M | $180M | $-63M |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | 15.1% | 26.1% | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | -17.5% | -27.4% | 10.7% | -158.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $53M | $3M | $4.93B | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $22M | $2.27B | $432K |
NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIP Group Inc. (NIPG) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 23.9 | -76.1% |
| The Brink's Company (BCO) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 12.6 | -87.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 48.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 48.4% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1%
GFAI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.9%
- 293.0% 10Y total return vs NIPG's -93.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 1.10, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.51x
HOFV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.4% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs HOFV's -366.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs GFAI's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs NIPG's -59.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 14.3% vs -41.6% |
NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCO leads in 4 of 6 categories
HOFV leads 1 • NIPG leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 315.1x HOFV's $17M. BCO is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOFV's -3.7%. On growth, BCO holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $72M | $5.4B | $17M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$12M | $797M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$24M | $180M | -$63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$6M | $544M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +15.1% | +26.1% | +63.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.5% | -27.4% | +10.7% | -158.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | -32.9% | +3.3% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | -8.8% | +10.1% | -64.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +3.6% | +10.3% | -33.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.4% | +38.9% | -35.3% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HOFV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $10M | $4.4B | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64M | -$9M | $7.1B | $251M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -0.89x | 22.93x | -0.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.73x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.28x | 0.84x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 0.16x | 11.14x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.5% | -69.7% | +45.6% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | -50.2% | +2.5% | -17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.7% | -41.6% | +14.3% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.5% | -19.1% | +12.1% | -7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.08x | 12.10x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | -$19M | $2.7B | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $22M | $2.3B | $432,174 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $3M | $4.9B | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -47.14x | -167.24x | 3.90x | -1.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCO five years ago would be worth $13,932 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, BCO leads with a +19.4% total return vs NIPG's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCO at 20.6% vs HOFV's -63.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.1% | -26.3% | -7.3% | 0.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.3% | -53.2% | +19.4% | -50.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -93.8% | +75.3% | -95.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -99.5% | +39.3% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -99.5% | +293.0% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.8% | -60.4% | +20.6% | -63.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCO and HOFV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCO currently trades 79.0% from its 52-week high vs NIPG's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 2.31x | 1.10x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $1.50 | $136.37 | $0.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.63 | $0.38 | $80.10 | $0.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.9% | +31.5% | +79.0% | +38.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 378K | 543K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
BCO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BCO is the only dividend payer here at 0.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $163.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% | 0.0% |
BCO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HOFV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NIPG vs GFAI vs BCO vs HOFV: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NIP Group Inc.
(NIPG) is the stronger pick with 48. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). The Brink's Company (BCO) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV?
Over the past 5 years, The Brink's Company (BCO) delivered a total return of +39.
3%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCO returned +293. 0% versus HOFV's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
48β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately -582% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NIP Group Inc.
(NIPG) is pulling ahead at 48. 4% versus -12. 1% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NIP Group Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 27. 2% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HOFV leads at 25. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV?
The Brink's Company (BCO) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -263. 4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCO leads at 11. 3% versus -139. 9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOFV leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV?
In this comparison, BCO (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NIPG, GFAI, HOFV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NIPG or GFAI or BCO or HOFV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
48)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99. 8%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NIPG and GFAI and BCO and HOFV?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIPG (Communication Services) and GFAI (Industrials) and BCO (Industrials) and HOFV (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIPG is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOFV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BCO pays a dividend while NIPG, GFAI, HOFV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.