Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Security & Protection Services
Telecommunications Services
NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Telecommunications Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Security & Protection Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.23B | $4.39B | $12M | $210.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $47M | $1.26B | $821M | $72M | $90.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $82M | $-139M | $-24M | $10.54B |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 36.9% | 47.6% | 15.1% | 54.3% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 8.4% | -16.3% | -27.4% | 20.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.9x | — | — | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $2M | $182M | $3M | $122.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $227M | $385M | $22M | $5.60B |
NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nixxy, Inc. (NIXX) | 100 | 23.1 | -76.9% |
| IDT Corporation (IDT) | 100 | 137.8 | +37.8% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 321.4 | +221.4% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIXX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- PEG 0.46 vs TMUS's 0.62
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.78x
- Lower P/E (13.9x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.46 vs 0.62
LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs NIXX's -80.8%
- +90.6% vs NIXX's -66.4%
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TMUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta -0.28, yield 1.9%
- 415.9% 10Y total return vs IDT's 326.2%
- 11.6% margin vs NIXX's -39.2%
- 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IDT's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs NIXX's -80.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.46 vs 0.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.6% margin vs NIXX's -39.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs LMND's 2.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs IDT's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.6% vs NIXX's -66.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs NIXX's -114.3%, ROIC 71.9% vs -329.9% |
NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TMUS leads in 3 of 6 categories
IDT leads 2 • LMND leads 1 • NIXX leads 0 • GFAI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMUS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TMUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.5B annually — 1930.4x NIXX's $47M. TMUS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIXX's -39.2%. On growth, NIXX holds the edge at +233.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $1.3B | $821M | $72M | $90.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $128M | -$121M | -$12M | $29.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $82M | -$139M | -$24M | $10.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $98M | $20M | -$6M | $10.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +36.9% | +47.6% | +15.1% | +54.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +8.4% | -16.3% | -27.4% | +20.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.2% | +6.5% | -16.9% | -32.9% | +11.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | +7.8% | +2.4% | -8.8% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +233.9% | +5.7% | +55.0% | +3.6% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.2% | +3.8% | +45.3% | +38.9% | -12.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IDT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.4x trailing earnings, IDT trades at a 13% valuation discount to TMUS's 20.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDT offers better value at 0.58x vs TMUS's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.2B | $4.4B | $12M | $210.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $1.0B | $4.2B | -$8M | $327.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 17.45x | -24.86x | -1.00x | 19.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.85x | — | — | 18.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.58x | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.25x | — | — | 10.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.77x | 1.00x | 5.95x | 0.32x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 4.02x | 7.69x | 0.18x | 3.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.54x | — | — | 20.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDT delivers a 24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-173 for NIXX. IDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDT scores 7/9 vs LMND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -173.4% | +24.1% | -26.5% | -69.7% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.3% | +12.8% | -7.4% | -50.2% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.3% | +71.9% | -36.8% | -41.6% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | +33.3% | -22.7% | -19.1% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.01x | 0.34x | 0.08x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$225M | -$203M | -$19M | $116.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $227M | $385M | $22M | $5.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $2M | $182M | $3M | $122.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -122.59x | — | — | -167.24x | 5.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LMND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDT five years ago would be worth $21,712 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +90.6% total return vs NIXX's -66.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMND at 57.5% vs GFAI's -58.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.0% | +4.0% | -24.7% | -17.3% | -2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.4% | +1.0% | +90.6% | -47.5% | -20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.9% | +60.4% | +290.5% | -92.7% | +41.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.9% | +117.1% | -29.5% | -99.5% | +51.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.9% | +326.2% | -17.6% | -99.5% | +415.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.2% | +17.1% | +57.5% | -58.1% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TMUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TMUS currently trades 74.3% from its 52-week high vs NIXX's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 0.68x | 2.75x | 2.31x | -0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.47 | $71.12 | $99.90 | $1.50 | $261.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $45.72 | $28.71 | $0.38 | $181.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.2% | +73.8% | +57.2% | +35.3% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 57.1 | 37.3 | 54.2 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 916K | 136K | 2.0M | 536K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TMUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDT as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", TMUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for TMUS (target: $254) vs 27.1% for LMND (target: $73). For income investors, TMUS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.87% vs IDT's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $72.67 | — | $254.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 15 | — | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.22 | — | — | $3.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% |
TMUS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). IDT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
NIXX vs IDT vs LMND vs GFAI vs TMUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXX). IDT Corporation (IDT) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IDT Corporation (IDT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS?
On trailing P/E, IDT Corporation (IDT) is the cheapest at 17.
4x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, IDT Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IDT Corporation wins at 0. 46x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. 's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS?
Over the past 5 years, IDT Corporation (IDT) delivered a total return of +117.
1%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +415. 9% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately -1083% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IDT Corporation (IDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for T-Mobile US, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMND leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS?
T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -36. 9% for Nixxy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 21. 2% versus -24. 4% for NIXX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIXX leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IDT Corporation (IDT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 46x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. 's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IDT Corporation (IDT) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for T-Mobile US, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMUS: 30. 7% to $254. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS?
In this comparison, TMUS (1.
9% yield), IDT (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. NIXX, LMND, GFAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NIXX or IDT or LMND or GFAI or TMUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +415. 9% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +415. 9%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIXX and IDT and LMND and GFAI and TMUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIXX (Industrials) and IDT (Communication Services) and LMND (Financial Services) and GFAI (Industrials) and TMUS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIXX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDT is a small-cap deep-value stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TMUS pays a dividend while NIXX, IDT, LMND, GFAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.