Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Telecommunications Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Specialty
NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Telecommunications Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $4M | $4.18B | $1.25B | $798M | $714M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $47M | $821M | $1.26B | $1.56B | $480M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-139M | $82M | $56M | $113M |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 47.6% | 36.9% | 17.9% | 40.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | -16.3% | 8.4% | 4.1% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.1x | 29.0x | 114.3x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $182M | $2M | $201M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $385M | $227M | $690M | $250M |
NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nixxy, Inc. (NIXX) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 330.1 | +230.1% |
| IDT Corporation (IDT) | 100 | 140.3 | +40.3% |
| Root, Inc. (ROOT) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
| Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIXX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 40.2% revenue growth vs NIXX's -80.8%
- +78.2% vs NIXX's -60.3%
IDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.4%
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs LMND's -21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.78x
ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
HIPO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 23.4% margin vs NIXX's -39.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs NIXX's -80.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.4% margin vs NIXX's -39.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs LMND's 2.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.2% vs NIXX's -60.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs NIXX's -114.3%, ROIC 71.9% vs -329.9% |
NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDT leads in 3 of 6 categories
HIPO leads 1 • ROOT leads 1 • NIXX leads 0 • LMND leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 33.3x NIXX's $47M. HIPO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIXX's -39.2%. On growth, NIXX holds the edge at +233.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $821M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $480M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$121M | $128M | $73M | $116M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$139M | $82M | $56M | $113M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $20M | $98M | $181M | $50M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +47.6% | +36.9% | +17.9% | +40.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | -16.3% | +8.4% | +4.1% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.2% | -16.9% | +6.5% | +3.6% | +23.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | +2.4% | +7.8% | +11.6% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +233.9% | +55.0% | +5.7% | +12.6% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.2% | +45.3% | +3.8% | +95.3% | +114.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, HIPO trades at a 51% valuation discount to ROOT's 25.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IDT's 8.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $4.2B | $1.3B | $798M | $714M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $4.0B | $1.0B | $309M | $517M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | -23.67x | 17.79x | 25.41x | 12.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.13x | 29.04x | 114.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.59x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.45x | 5.88x | 8.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.37x | 5.67x | 1.02x | 0.53x | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 7.33x | 4.10x | 2.47x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.77x | 4.15x | 78.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IDT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIPO delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-173 for NIXX. IDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROOT's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IDT scores 7/9 vs LMND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -173.4% | -26.5% | +24.1% | +15.4% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.3% | -7.4% | +12.8% | +3.7% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.3% | -36.8% | +71.9% | — | +22.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | -22.7% | +33.3% | +3.8% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.34x | 0.01x | 0.51x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$203M | -$225M | -$489M | -$198M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $385M | $227M | $690M | $250M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $182M | $2M | $201M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -122.59x | — | — | 1.86x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDT five years ago would be worth $21,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,105 for HIPO. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +78.2% total return vs NIXX's -60.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROOT at 117.4% vs NIXX's -30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.0% | -28.3% | +6.0% | -19.7% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.3% | +78.2% | +1.6% | -59.3% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.7% | +234.7% | +64.9% | +927.3% | +48.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.7% | -31.2% | +119.3% | -69.6% | -88.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.7% | -21.6% | +324.0% | -88.3% | -90.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.0% | +49.6% | +18.1% | +117.4% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IDT currently trades 75.3% from its 52-week high vs NIXX's 26.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 2.75x | 0.68x | 2.30x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.47 | $99.90 | $71.12 | $162.99 | $38.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $28.71 | $45.72 | $40.91 | $19.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.7% | +54.5% | +75.3% | +34.9% | +70.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 36.3 | 60.6 | 56.6 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 913K | 1.9M | 136K | 330K | 110K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LMND as "Buy", IDT as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold", HIPO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for LMND (target: $73) vs 3.4% for HIPO (target: $28). IDT is the only dividend payer here at 0.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $72.67 | — | $75.00 | $28.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 2 | 14 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.22 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
IDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HIPO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
NIXX vs LMND vs IDT vs ROOT vs HIPO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXX). Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (114. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO?
On trailing P/E, Hippo Holdings Inc.
(HIPO) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Root, Inc. at 25. 4x. On forward P/E, IDT Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO?
Over the past 5 years, IDT Corporation (IDT) delivered a total return of +119.
3%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDT returned +324. 0% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IDT Corporation (IDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 305% more volatile than IDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IDT Corporation (IDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 51% for Root, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hippo Holdings Inc. grew EPS 235. 4% year-over-year, compared to 18. 5% for IDT Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO?
Hippo Holdings Inc.
(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -36. 9% for Nixxy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIPO leads at 13. 5% versus -24. 4% for NIXX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIXX leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IDT Corporation (IDT) trades at 14.
1x forward P/E versus 114. 3x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 100. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMND: 33. 5% to $72. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO?
In this comparison, IDT (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. NIXX, LMND, ROOT, HIPO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NIXX or LMND or IDT or ROOT or HIPO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IDT Corporation (IDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), +324. 0% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDT: +324. 0%, ROOT: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIXX and LMND and IDT and ROOT and HIPO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIXX (Industrials) and LMND (Financial Services) and IDT (Communication Services) and ROOT (Financial Services) and HIPO (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIXX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDT is a small-cap deep-value stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.