Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Household & Personal Products
Household & Personal Products
Business Equipment & Supplies
NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products | Business Equipment & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $570M | $1.93B | $1.90B | $373M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $504M | $1.79B | $7.19B | $2.82B | $1.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-899M | $-281M | $126M | $74M |
| Gross Margin | 15.9% | 45.7% | 34.0% | 36.9% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 6.0% | 6.4% | 5.4% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 30.8x | 7.2x | 8.1x | 15.5x | 4.6x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $78M | $5.65B | $654M | $921M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $19M | $203M | $124M | $64M |
NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Presto Ind… (NPK) | 100 | 158.3 | +58.3% |
| Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE) | 100 | 13.6 | -86.4% |
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 34.5 | -65.5% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth -20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 112.2% 10Y total return vs SPB's 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 8.4%, current ratio 4.24x
- 29.7% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
HELE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NWL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.87, yield 2.3%, current ratio 2.26x
- Beta 0.87 vs NWL's 1.89, lower leverage
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 15.5x)
- 7.1% yield, vs NWL's 6.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs HELE's -50.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs NWL's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs NWL's 6.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.5% vs NWL's -8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs HELE's -37.8%, ROIC 8.2% vs 4.6% |
NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NPK leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACCO leads 1 • HELE leads 0 • NWL leads 0 • SPB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NPK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 14.3x NPK's $504M. NPK is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HELE's -50.3%. On growth, NPK holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $504M | $1.8B | $7.2B | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $107M | $696M | $252M | $177M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$899M | -$281M | $126M | $74M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | $171M | $19M | $290M | $49M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +45.7% | +34.0% | +36.9% | +30.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +5.4% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | -50.3% | -3.9% | +4.5% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +9.6% | +0.3% | +10.3% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.7% | -3.3% | -1.1% | +4.9% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +172.5% | -2.1% | +9.9% | +26.6% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 70% valuation discount to NPK's 30.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACCO's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NPK's 21.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $570M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $373M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $629M | $7.4B | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.77x | -0.63x | -6.68x | 21.11x | 9.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.21x | 8.07x | 15.48x | 4.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.63x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.85x | — | 9.73x | 10.89x | 6.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 0.32x | 0.27x | 0.68x | 0.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 0.71x | 0.79x | 1.10x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.33x | 113.48x | 11.44x | 7.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NPK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACCO delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-95 for HELE. NPK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWL's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACCO scores 7/9 vs NPK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | -94.5% | -11.1% | +6.6% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | -37.8% | -2.5% | +3.7% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +4.6% | +4.3% | +3.9% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +5.0% | +5.3% | +4.2% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.10x | 2.36x | 0.34x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $59M | $5.4B | $531M | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $19M | $203M | $124M | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $78M | $5.7B | $654M | $921M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.02x | 0.01x | 4.63x | 2.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPK five years ago would be worth $15,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,093 for HELE. Over the past 12 months, NPK leads with a +72.5% total return vs NWL's -8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPK at 29.1% vs HELE's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.1% | +19.9% | +23.9% | +36.5% | +11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.5% | -7.6% | -8.4% | +30.0% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.0% | -74.3% | -46.9% | +18.1% | -4.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.3% | -89.1% | -75.3% | -5.0% | -39.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.2% | -75.5% | -75.6% | +15.3% | -35.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.1% | -36.4% | -19.0% | +5.7% | -1.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NPK and SPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPB is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPK currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs NWL's 68.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.63x | 1.89x | 0.87x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $149.85 | $33.76 | $6.64 | $86.95 | $4.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.70 | $13.85 | $3.07 | $49.99 | $2.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +73.2% | +68.4% | +93.7% | +94.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 79.0 | 58.3 | 45.8 | 74.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 628K | 5.9M | 317K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWL and SPB and ACCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HELE as "Hold", NWL as "Hold", SPB as "Buy", ACCO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs -11.0% for HELE (target: $22). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.11% vs NPK's 0.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $5.35 | $87.75 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 26 | 21 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — | +6.3% | +2.3% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | — | $0.29 | $1.86 | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +17.2% | +4.1% |
NPK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NPK vs HELE vs NWL vs SPB vs ACCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus National Presto Industries, Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO?
Over the past 5 years, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) delivered a total return of +52. 3%, compared to -89. 1% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NPK returned +112. 2% versus NWL's -75. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NWL is approximately 119% more volatile than SPB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Presto Industries, Inc. (NPK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 2% for Newell Brands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to -827. 7% for Helen of Troy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPK leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO?
National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus -50. 3% for Helen of Troy Limited — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPK leads at 8. 5% versus 4. 4% for SPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HELE leads at 45. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4.
6x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 98. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO?
In this comparison, ACCO (7.
1% yield), NWL (6. 3% yield), SPB (2. 3% yield), NPK (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. HELE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NPK or HELE or NWL or SPB or ACCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
(SPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 3% yield). Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPB: +15. 3%, HELE: -75. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NPK and HELE and NWL and SPB and ACCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NPK (Industrials) and HELE (Consumer Defensive) and NWL (Consumer Defensive) and SPB (Consumer Defensive) and ACCO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. NPK, NWL, SPB, ACCO pay a dividend while HELE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.