NPO
EnPro Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$6.36B
5Y Perf.+585.9%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.5%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-27.2%
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$15.83B
5Y Perf.+50.5%
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$4.41B
5Y Perf.+95.9%
NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NPO | GTLS | FBIN | NDSN | FELE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Construction | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $6.36B | $9.93B | $4.68B | $15.83B | $4.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $4.26B | $3.36B | $2.85B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $40M | $195M | $523M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 32.6% | 45.6% | 55.2% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 8.5% | 10.6% | 25.9% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 33.6x | 16.4x | 11.6x | 24.8x | 21.6x |
| Total Debt | $655M | $3.74B | $2.54B | $2.09B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $115M | $366M | $264M | $108M | $100M |
NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NPO
GTLS
FBIN
NDSN
FELE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnPro Industries, I… (NPO) | 100 | 685.9 | +585.9% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
| Nordson Corporation (NDSN) | 100 | 150.5 | +50.5% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 195.9 | +95.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NPO and FBIN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. NDSN and GTLS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NPO
EnPro Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
NPO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
- 9.0% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2%
- +74.7% vs FBIN's -16.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Choice
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.56 vs NPO's 1.61
Best for: stability
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play
FBIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 21.6x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NDSN's 1.1%
Best for: value and dividends
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
The Income Pick
NDSN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 4.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
- PEG 1.68 vs FELE's 2.48
- 18.4% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
The Defensive Pick
FELE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NPO | 9.0% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 21.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | NDSN | 18.4% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs NPO's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NDSN's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NPO | +74.7% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NDSN | 10.2% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 10.5% vs 7.4% |
NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNPOLAGGINGFELE
Who Leads Where
NDSN leads in 1 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • NPO leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓FELEFranklin Electric Co.…
1leads
NDSNNordson Corporation
1leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
1leads
NPOEnPro Industries, Inc.
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GTLSvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NDSN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FELE6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NPO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NDSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 3.7x NPO's $1.1B. NDSN is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, NPO holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | NDSNNordson Corporati… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $4.3B | $3.4B | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $264M | $644M | $482M | $851M | $322M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $40M | $195M | $523M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | $203M | $420M | $646M | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.6% | +32.6% | +45.6% | +55.2% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +8.5% | +10.6% | +25.9% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +0.9% | +5.8% | +18.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +4.8% | +12.5% | +22.7% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -2.5% | -106.4% | +8.8% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -36.1% | -2.0% | +44.2% | +13.4% |
NDSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NDSN offers better value at 2.26x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | NDSNNordson Corporati… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $9.9B | $4.7B | $15.8B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $13.3B | $7.0B | $17.8B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 157.56x | 628.45x | 15.82x | 33.39x | 30.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.57x | 16.40x | 11.56x | 24.80x | 21.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.26x | 3.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.09x | 14.33x | 10.08x | 20.66x | 13.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.56x | 2.33x | 1.05x | 5.67x | 2.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.09x | 2.79x | 1.98x | 5.31x | 3.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.94x | 48.95x | 12.77x | 23.94x | 22.81x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NDSN delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPO scores 7/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | NDSNNordson Corporati… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +1.2% | +8.3% | +16.8% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +10.2% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +7.4% | +8.1% | +10.5% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.6% | +9.9% | +13.4% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 1.11x | 1.07x | 0.69x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $541M | $3.4B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $181M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $115M | $366M | $264M | $108M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $655M | $3.7B | $2.5B | $2.1B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | 1.08x | 4.72x | 7.44x | 24.75x |
FELE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPO five years ago would be worth $32,941 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, NPO leads with a +74.7% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPO at 47.2% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | NDSNNordson Corporati… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +0.6% | -22.8% | +18.2% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.7% | +37.6% | -16.8% | +51.8% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.7% | +62.7% | -36.3% | +34.5% | +10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.4% | +29.5% | -54.0% | +42.4% | +20.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +575.2% | +772.5% | -2.4% | +298.2% | +231.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.2% | +17.6% | -13.9% | +10.4% | +3.2% |
NPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NPO's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | NDSNNordson Corporati… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 0.49x | 1.61x | 1.04x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $310.13 | $208.51 | $64.84 | $305.28 | $111.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $167.56 | $140.50 | $36.07 | $188.22 | $83.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +99.5% | +60.3% | +93.1% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 51.2 | 46.8 | 59.3 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 1.6M | 2.6M | 306K | 281K |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and NDSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NPO as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", FBIN as "Hold", NDSN as "Buy", FELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.4% upside for FBIN (target: $56) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | NDSNNordson Corporati… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $315.00 | $193.81 | $56.43 | $311.50 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 37 | 27 | 20 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.3% | +2.5% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $0.60 | $1.00 | $3.15 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% | +1.9% | +3.8% |
Evenly matched — FBIN and NDSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NDSN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallEnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NPO vs GTLS vs FBIN vs NDSN vs FELE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is the stronger pick with 9. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nordson Corporation wins at 1. 68x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE?
Over the past 5 years, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) delivered a total return of +229. 4%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 7% versus FBIN's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus EnPro Industries, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning NPO is approximately 234% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is pulling ahead at 9. 0% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nordson Corporation grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE?
Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NDSN leads at 25. 5% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NDSN leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. 's 2. 48x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 6x for EnPro Industries, Inc. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 44. 4% to $56. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is NPO or GTLS or FBIN or NDSN or FELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, NPO: +593. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NPO and GTLS and FBIN and NDSN and FELE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NDSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FBIN, NDSN, FELE pay a dividend while NPO, GTLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NPO: 14.3% · GTLS: -2.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NPO: 157.6x · GTLS: 628.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.