Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $85M | $952M | $11.19B | $2.04B | $14.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $242K | $0.00 | $708M | $0.00 | $4.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-288M | $-188M | $-238M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 59.5% | — | 92.6% | — | 66.9% |
| Operating Margin | -63.0% | — | -24.8% | — | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $631K | $21M | $241M | $0.00 | $5.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $150M | $323M | $258M | $1.39B |
NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 28.4 | -71.6% |
| Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM) | 100 | 305.1 | +205.1% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 211.0 | +111.0% |
| Jazz Pharmaceutical… (JAZZ) | 100 | 158.3 | +58.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRXP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth.
- 101.1% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9%
CMPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 1.3% margin vs NRXP's -157.3%
AXSM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.67
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 38.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 133.7%
- 18.6% 10Y total return vs MNMD's 5.1%
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 1.55x
MNMD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +220.3% vs NRXP's +50.2%
JAZZ is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, current ratio 1.86x
- 0.3% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.1% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs NRXP's -157.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs NRXP's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.3% vs NRXP's +50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.3% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JAZZ leads in 3 of 6 categories
MNMD leads 1 • NRXP leads 0 • CMPS leads 0 • AXSM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAZZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAZZ and MNMD operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. JAZZ is the more profitable business, keeping 0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -157.3%. On growth, AXSM holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $242,000 | $0 | $708M | $0 | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | -$179M | -$167M | -$191M | $994M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$288M | -$188M | -$238M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$157M | -$71M | -$174M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | — | +92.6% | — | +66.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -63.0% | — | -24.8% | — | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -157.3% | — | -26.6% | — | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.0% | — | -10.0% | — | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +57.4% | — | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.0% | -58.7% | -3.3% | -163.0% | +3.9% |
Valuation Metrics
JAZZ leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $952M | $11.2B | $2.0B | $14.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78M | $824M | $11.1B | $1.8B | $18.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.30x | -3.22x | -59.07x | -10.04x | -38.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 9.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 23.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 69.60x | — | 17.52x | — | 3.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 122.48x | 5.56x | 3.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 10.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JAZZ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JAZZ delivers a 0.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS. JAZZ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXSM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs CMPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.4% | -2.6% | -102.5% | +0.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | -106.8% | -27.8% | -70.7% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -19.1% | -3.9% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -2.5% | -52.1% | -52.2% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 2.73x | — | 1.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$129M | -$82M | -$258M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $150M | $323M | $258M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $631,000 | $21M | $241M | $0 | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.18x | -52.40x | -34.13x | -21.81x | -3.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXSM five years ago would be worth $39,967 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $96 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +220.3% total return vs NRXP's +50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs NRXP's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +51.3% | +21.7% | +51.7% | +30.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +163.6% | +99.7% | +220.3% | +129.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +17.1% | +179.7% | +510.3% | +62.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -72.3% | +299.7% | -55.1% | +28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | -65.8% | +1861.9% | +512.1% | +52.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.8% | +5.4% | +40.9% | +82.7% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AXSM and MNMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs NRXP's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.28x | 0.67x | 1.63x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.84 | $10.21 | $233.75 | $21.09 | $230.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $2.25 | $96.09 | $6.03 | $97.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +97.1% | +93.0% | +98.1% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 63.4 | 75.4 | 64.9 | 74.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 924K | 3.6M | 658K | 779K | 843K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMPS as "Buy", AXSM as "Buy", MNMD as "Buy", JAZZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.6% upside for CMPS (target: $18) vs -3.3% for MNMD (target: $20).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $255.81 | $20.00 | $225.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 25 | 1 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
JAZZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNMD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NRXP vs CMPS vs AXSM vs MNMD vs JAZZ: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger pick with 65. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ). Analysts rate COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ?
Over the past 5 years, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) delivered a total return of +299. 7%, compared to -99. 0% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +1862% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NRXP is approximately 184% more volatile than AXSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 126% versus 3% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is pulling ahead at 65. 5% versus 4. 9% for Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXSM leads at 133. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ?
COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JAZZ leads at 5. 3% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMPS: 81.
6% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NRXP or CMPS or AXSM or MNMD or JAZZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), +1862% 10Y return). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +1862%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NRXP and CMPS and AXSM and MNMD and JAZZ?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JAZZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.